Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.2.107

Difference in Voice Parameters of MDVP and Praat Programs according to Severity of Voice Disorders in Vocal Nodule  

Shim, SangYong (연세대학교 대학원 언어병리학협동과정)
Kim, HyangHee (연세대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실 및 재활의학연구소, 연세대학교 대학원 언어병리학협동과정)
Kim, JaeOck (강남대학교 교육대학원 언어치료교육전공)
Shin, JiCheol (연세대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실 및 재활의학연구소)
Publication Information
Phonetics and Speech Sciences / v.6, no.2, 2014 , pp. 107-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
MDVP and Praat are measured by nine variables in common; F0, jitter local, jitter absolute, jitter relative average perturbation, jitter period perturbation quotient, shimmer local, shimmer dB, shimmer amplitude perturbation quotient, and NHR. In the present study, 30 female subjects were divided by their disorders(control group, vocal nodule group), ages(from 18 to 50 years old), gender(women), and severities of voice disorder(GRBAS-G0, G1, G2). Then, the subjects' vowel /a/ was evaluated by MDVP and Praat. First, jitter and shimmer variables of the MDVP were significantly different by severities. Praat showed different jitter, shimmer, and NHR parameters by severities. Second, jitter and NHR levels of MDVP were meaningfully higher than Praat regardless their severities. The result of the research confirms the relationships among GRBAS, MDVP and Praat as well as the differences in acoustic variables between MDVP and Praat.
Keywords
MDVP; Praat; GRBAS; Vocal Nodule; F0; Jitter; Shimmer; NHR;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bhuta, T., Patrick, L. & Garnett, J. D. (2004). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. Journal of Voice 18(3), 299-304.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ko, D. H., Jeong, O. R. & et al. (2001). Manual of speech and language acoustic analysis programs. Seoul: Hankukmunhwasa. (고도흥, 정옥란 외 (2001). 음성 및 언어 분석기기 활용법. 서울: 한국문화사.)
3 Silva, D. G., Oliveira, L. C. & Andrea, M. (2009). Jitter estimation algorithms for detection of pathological voices. Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 9.
4 Yoo, J. Y., Jeong, O. R., Jang, T. Y. & Ko, D. H. (2003). A correlation study among acoustic parameters of MDVP, Praat, and Dr. Speech. Speech Sciences 10(3), 29-36. (유재연, 정옥란, 장태염, 고도흥 (2003). MDVP와 Praat, Dr. Speech간의 음향학적 측정치에 관한 상관연구. 음성과학 10(3), 29-36.)   과학기술학회마을
5 Manfredi, C., Bocchi, L. & Cantarella, G. (2009). A multipurpose user-friendly tool for voice analysis: application to pathological adult voices. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 4(3), 211-219.
6 Maryn, Y., Corthals, P., De Bodt, M., Van Cauwenberge, P. & Deliyski, D. (2009). Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between multi-dimensional voice program and praat. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 61, 217-226.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Lieshout, P. (2004). Praat short tutorial. Toronto: University of Toronto.
8 Oguz, H., Kilic, M. A. & Safak, M. A. (2011). Comparison of results in two acoustic analysis programs: praat and mdvp. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 41(5), 835-841.
9 Amir, O., Wolf, M. & Amir, N. (2009). A clinical comparison between two acoustic analysis softwares: MDVP and Praat. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 4(3), 202-205.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Deliyski, D. D., Heather, S., Shaw, K. E. & Maegan, K. E. (2005). Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 30(2), 55-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Bielamowicz, S., Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R. & Dauer, M. S. & Berke, G. S. (1996). Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39, 126-134.   DOI
12 Lee, M. K. (2011). Comparison on Frequency of Vocal Misuse and Abuse Behavior in Normal and Vocal Nodules Children. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 11(9), 429-436. (이무경 (2011). 정상 아동과 성대 결절 아동의 음성 오용 및 남용 행동의 발생 빈도 비교. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 11(9), 429-436.)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ueng, S. K., Luo, C. M., Tsai, T. Y. & Chang, H. (2012). Voice quality assessment and visualization. Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 618-623.
14 Ko, D. H. (2003). A study of extracting acoustic parameters for individual speakers. Speech Sciences 10(2), 129-143. (고도흥 (2003). 개별화자 음성파라미터 추출에 관한 연구: 음성파라미터 상관관계 중심으로. 음성과학 10(2), 129-143.)   과학기술학회마을
15 Finger, L. S., Cielo, C. A. & Schwarz, K. (2009). Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 75(3), 432-440.   DOI
16 Uloza, V., Saferis, V. & Uloziene, I. (2005). Perceptual and acoustic assessment of voice pathology and the efficacy of endolaryngeal phonomicrosurgery. Journal of Voice 19(1), 138-145.   DOI
17 Dejonckere, P. H., Obbens, C., Demoor, G. M. & Wienecke, G. H. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 45, 76-83.   DOI
18 Yu, P., Ouaknine, M., Revis, J. & Giovanni, A. (2001). Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocolincluding acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. Journal of Voice 15(4), 529-542.   DOI
19 Na, H. (2010). Supraglottic activity, vocal cord vibration and acoustic parameters characteristics of vocal folds nodules patients. M.A. Thesis, Ewha womans university. (나희 (2010). 성대 결절 환자의 성문 상부 움직임 및 성대 진동양상, 음향학적 특성 비교 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.)
20 Pyo, H. Y., Sim, H. S. & Lim, S. E (2000). The change of correlation between GRBAS scales and MDVP parameters according to the different length of voice samples for MDVP analysis. Speech Sciences 7(2), 71-81. (표화영, 심현섭, 임성은 (2000). 음성 Sample의 길이 변화에 따른 MDVP 측정치와 GRBAS 척도 간의 상관관계 변화 비교. 음성과학 7(2), 71-81.)   과학기술학회마을
21 Jeong, G. E., Kim, S. T., Kim, S. Y., Roh, J. L., Nam, S. Y. & Choi, S. H. (2010). Factors Predictive of Voice Therapy Outcome in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. The Journal of the Korean Society of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 21(2), 121-127. (정고은, 김성태, 김상윤, 노종렬, 남순열, 최승호 (2010). 일측성 성대마비 환자에서 음성치료 효과를 예측할 수 있는 인자. 대한음성언어의학회지 21(2), 121-127.)   과학기술학회마을
22 Manfredi, C., Giordano, A., Schoentgen, J., Fraj, S., Bocchi, L. & Dejonckere, P. H. (2012). Perturbation measurements in highly irregular voice signals: performances/validity of analysis software tools. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 7, 409-416.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Boersma, P. (2009). Should jitter be measured by peak picking or by waveform matching?. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 61(5), 305-308.   DOI
24 McFarlane, S. C., Watterson, T. L. & Von Berg, S. (1999). Behavioral intervention in the presence of unilateral vocal fold paralysis: indications, diagnosis, techniques, and interpretation. Phonoscope 2(4), 203-215.
25 Kim, J. O. (2009). Acoustic Characteristics of the Voices of Korean Normal Adults by Gender on MDVP. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences 1(4), 147-157. (김재옥 (2009). 성별에 따른 한국 정상 성인 음성의 음향학적 평가 기준치. 말소리와 음성과학 1(4), 147-157.)   과학기술학회마을
26 Boone, D. R., Mcfarlane, S. C., Von Berg, S. L. & Zraick, R. I. (2009). The voice and voice therapy(8th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
27 Linville, S. E. (1996). The sound of senescence. Journal of Voice 10(2), 190-200.   DOI
28 Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag.
29 Dejonckere, P. H., Schoentgen, J., Giordano, A., Fraj, S., Bocchi, L. & Manfredi, C. (2011). Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 36, 70-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Oguz, H., Tarhan, E., Korkmaz, M., Yilmaz, U., Safak, M. A. & Demirci, M. (2007). Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Journal of Voice 21, 203-210.   DOI