Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2022.33.4.164

50-300 keV X-ray Transmission Ratios for Lead, Steel and Concrete  

Tae Hwan Kim (Radiation Safety Section, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Kum Bae Kim (Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Geun Beom Kim (Research Team of Medical Physics, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Dong Wook Kim (Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Sang Rok Kim (Radiation Safety Section, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Sang Hyoun Choi (Research Team of Medical Physics, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
Publication Information
Progress in Medical Physics / v.33, no.4, 2022 , pp. 164-171 More about this Journal
Abstract
The number of facilities using radiation generators increases and related regulations are strengthened, the establishment of a shielding management and evaluation technology has become important. The characteristics of the radiation generator used in previous report differ from those of currently available high-frequency radiation generators. This study aimed to manufacture lead, iron, and concrete shielding materials for the re-verification of half-value layers, tenth-value layers, and attenuation curve. For a comparison of attenuation ratio, iron, lead, and concrete shields were manufactured in this study. The initial dose was measured without shielding materials, and doses measured under different types and thicknesses of shielding material were compared with the initial dose to calculate the transmission rate on 50-300 kVp X-ray. All the three shielding materials showed a tendency to require greater shielding thickness for higher energy. The attenuation graph showed an exponential shape as the thickness decreased and a straight line as the thickness increased. The difference between the measurement results and the previous study, except in extrapolated parts, may be due to the differences in the radiation generation characteristics between the generators used in the two studies. The attenuated graph measured in this study better reflects the characteristics of current radiation generators, which would be more effective for shield designing.
Keywords
Half-value layers; Tenth-value layers; Attenuation rate; Radiation protection; X-ray attenuation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ministry of Science and ICT. Survey on the status of radiation/RI utilization. General table of usage of radioactive isotopes and radiation generators. Sejong: Ministry of Science and ICT, 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 29]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=127&tblId=TX_10504_A000
2 Korean Law Information Center. Enforcement decree of the serious accidents punishment act. Sejong: Korean Law Information Center, 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 29]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/eng/engLsSc.do?menuId=2&query=ENFORCEMENT%20DECREE%20OF%20THE%20SERIOUS%20ACCIDENTS%20PUNISHMENT%20ACT#liBgcolor0
3 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Structural shielding design and evaluation for medical use of X rays and gamma rays of energies up to 10 MeV. Bethesda: NCRP. 1976; 49.
4 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Radiation protection design guidelines for 0.1 to 100 MeV particle accelerator facilities. Washington, D.C.: NCRP. 1977; 51.
5 Trout ED, Kelley JP. Scattered radiation from a tissue-equivalent phantom for x rays from 50 to 300 kVp. Radiology. 1972;104:161-169.   DOI
6 Kim TG, Cheon MW, Park YP. Comparison of output and radiation quality of X-rays according to the full-wave rectification method and dual-voltage rectification method of an X-ray generator. KIEEME. 2010;23:534-538.
7 Trout ED, Kelley JP, Lucas AC. Broad beam attenuation in concrete for 50 to 300-Kvp x-rays and in lead for 300 Kvp xrays. Radiology. 1959;72:62-67.   DOI
8 Miller W, Kennedy RJ. X-ray attenuation in lead, aluminum, and concrete in the range 275 to 525 kilovolts. Radiology. 1955;65:920-925.   DOI
9 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP. 2007; 103.
10 Gabriel T: The rise and fall of the thin concrete shell. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Flexible Formwork. Bath: University of Bath; 2012:324-333.
11 Jang HG, Min JH, Han GT, Lee BH, Oh SJ. Establishment of the infrastructure for the quality assurance and the dissemination of radiation measurement standard in medicine. Sejong: Ministry of Science and ICT. 2019;2014M2B8A3032609.
12 Cember H, Johnson TE. Introduction to health physics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
13 Kim JH, An SH, Oh YJ, Ji YS, Huh JY, Kang CM, et al. HVL Measurement of the miniature X-ray tube using diode detector. Korean J Med Phys. 2012;23:279-284.
14 Torres Del Rio J, Forastero C, Tornero-Lopez AM, Lopez JJ, Guirado D, Perez-Calatayud J, et al. Air density dependence of the soft X-ray PTW 34013 ionization chamber. Phys Med. 2018;46:109-113.   DOI
15 Lee CL, Kim HJ, Jeon SS, Cho HM, Nam S, Jung JY, et al. Comparison of radiation dose in the measurement of MDCT radiation dose according to correction of temperatures and pressure, and calibration of ionization chamber. Korean J Med Phys. 2008;19:49-55.
16 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Alexandria: AAPM. 2001; 76.
17 Amin MN, Ahmad I, Iqbal M, Abbas A, Khan K, Faraz MI, et al. Computational AI models for investigating the radiation shielding potential of high-density concrete. Materials (Basel). 2022;15:4573.