Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2022.33.4.150

Monte Carlo Algorithm-Based Dosimetric Comparison between Commissioning Beam Data across Two Elekta Linear Accelerators with AgilityTM MLC System  

Geum Bong Yu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Chang Heon Choi (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Jung-in Kim (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Jin Dong Cho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Euntaek Yoon (Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University)
Hyung Jin Choun (Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital)
Jihye Choi (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University)
Soyeon Kim (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University)
Yongsik Kim (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Seoul National University)
Do Hoon Oh (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital)
Hwajung Lee (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital)
Lee Yoo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital)
Minsoo Chun (Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Publication Information
Progress in Medical Physics / v.33, no.4, 2022 , pp. 150-157 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Elekta synergy® was commissioned in the Seoul National University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. Recently, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital commissioned Elekta Versa HDTM. The beam characteristics of both machines are similar because of the same AgilityTM MLC Model. We compared measured beam data calculated using the Elekta treatment planning system, Monaco®, for each institute. Methods: Beam of the commissioning Elekta linear accelerator were measured in two independent institutes. After installing the beam model based on the measured beam data into the Monaco®, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data were generated, mimicking the beam data in a virtual water phantom. Measured beam data were compared with the calculated data, and their similarity was quantitatively evaluated by the gamma analysis. Results: We compared the percent depth dose (PDD) and off-axis profiles of 6 MV photon and 6 MeV electron beams with MC calculation. With a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion, the photon PDD and profiles showed 100% gamma passing rates except for one inplane profile at 10 cm depth from VMTH. Gamma analysis of the measured photon beam off-axis profiles between the two institutes showed 100% agreement. The electron beams also indicated 100% agreement in PDD distributions. However, the gamma passing rates of the off-axis profiles were 91%-100% with a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion. Conclusions: The beam and their comparison with MC calculation for each institute showed good performance. Although the measuring tools were orthogonal, no significant difference was found.
Keywords
Agility multi-leaf collimator; Commissioning beam data; Profile measurement; Percent depth dose measurement; Monaco Monte Carlo algorithm;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gholampourkashi S, Cygler JE, Belec J, Vujicic M, Heath E. Monte Carlo and analytic modeling of an Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC: investigating the significance of accurate model parameters for small radiation fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:55-67.
2 Can S, Karacetin D, Meric N. Beam modeling and commissioning for Monte Carlo photon beam on an Elekta Versa HD LINAC. Appl Radiat Isot. 2022;180:110054.
3 Paudel MR, Kim A, Sarfehnia A, Ahmad SB, Beachey DJ, Sahgal A, et al. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:230-241.   DOI
4 Narayanasamy G, Saenz D, Cruz W, Ha CS, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. Commissioning an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:179-191.
5 Kinoshita N, Oguchi H, Adachi T, Shioura H, Kimura H. Uncertainty in positioning ion chamber at reference depth for various water phantoms. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23:199-206.   DOI
6 Tessier F, Kawrakow I. Effective point of measurement of thimble ion chambers in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys. 2010;37:96-107.
7 Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26:1847-70.
8 Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25:656-61.   DOI
9 Snyder JE, Hyer DE, Flynn RT, Boczkowski A, Wang D. The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:184-193.
10 Meyers SM, Balderson MJ, Letourneau D. Evaluation of Elekta Agility multi-leaf collimator performance using statistical process control tools. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:100-108.   DOI
11 Kabat CN, Defoor DL, Myers P, Kirby N, Rasmussen K, Saenz DL, et al. Evaluation of the Elekta Agility MLC performance using high-resolution log files. Med Phys. 2019;46:1397-1407.   DOI