Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2020.31.4.153

Dosimetric Evaluation of an Automatically Converted Radiation Therapy Plan between Radixact Machines  

Lee, Mi Young (Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kang, Dae Gyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kim, Jin Sung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Progress in Medical Physics / v.31, no.4, 2020 , pp. 153-162 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of an automatically converted radiation therapy plan between Radixact machines by comparing the original plan with the transferred plan. Methods: The study involved a total of 20 patients for each randomly selected treatment site who received radiation treatment with Radixact. We set up the cheese phantom (Gammex RMI, Middleton, WI, USA) with an Exradin A1SL ion chamber (Standard Imaging, Madison, WI, USA) and GAFCHROMIC EBT3 film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ, USA) inserted. We used three methods to evaluate an automatically converted radiation therapy plan using the features of the Plan transfer. First, we evaluated and compared Planning target volume (PTV) coverage (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI) and organs at risk (OAR) dose statistics. Second, we compared the absolute dose using an ion chamber. Lastly, we analyzed gamma passing rates using film. Results: Our results showed that the difference in PTV coverage was 1.72% in HI and 0.17% in CI, and majority of the difference in OAR was within 1% across all sites. The difference (%) in absolute dose values was averaging 0.74%. In addition, the gamma passing rate was 99.64% for 3%/3 mm and 97.08% for 2%/2 mm. Conclusions: The Plan transfer function can be reliably used in appropriate situations.
Keywords
Plan transfer; Radixact; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Integrated Data Management System; Gamma passing rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Med Phys. 2003;30:2455-2464.   DOI
2 Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, Gall KP, Galvin JM, McLaughlin WL, et al. Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 55. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys. 1998;25:2093-2115.   DOI
3 Ramachandran P, Tajaldeen A, Taylor D, Wanigaratne D, Roozen K, Geso M. Evaluation and performance of Arc-Check and film using gamma criteria in pre-treatment quality assurance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. J Med Phys. 2017;42:251-257.   DOI
4 Zhang X, Penagaricano J, Narayanasamy G, Corry P, Liu T, Sanjay M, et al. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:178-185.   DOI
5 Depuydt T, Van Esch A, Huyskens DP. A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation. Radiother Oncol. 2002;62:309-319.   DOI
6 Cusumano D, Fumagalli ML, Marchetti M, Fariselli L, De Martin E. Dosimetric verification of stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy dose distributions using Gafchromic EBT3. Med Dosim. 2015;40:226-231.   DOI
7 An YC, Kim JS, Kwon DY, Kim JM, Choi BK. Usability as-sessment of plan transfer between TOMO HAD and Radixact: planning study. J Korean Soc Radiat Ther. 2018;30:117-128.
8 Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, Reckwerdt P, Deasy JO, Yang J, et al. Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys. 1993;20:1709-1719.   DOI
9 Yuan Z, Nair CK, Benedict SH, Valicenti RK, Rao S, Fragoso RC, et al. Converting treatment plans from helical tomotherapy to L-shape Linac: clinical workflow and dosimetric evaluation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018;17:1533033818785279.
10 Lewis D, Micke A, Yu X, Chan MF. An efficient protocol for radiochromic film dosimetry combining calibration and measurement in a single scan. Med Phys. 2012;39:6339-6350.   DOI
11 Casanova Borca V, Pasquino M, Russo G, Grosso P, Cante D, Sciacero P, et al. Dosimetric characterization and use of GAFCHROMIC EBT3 film for IMRT dose verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14:4111.
12 Martisikova M, Ackermann B, Jakel O. Analysis of uncertainties in Gafchromic EBT film dosimetry of photon beams. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:7013-7027.   DOI
13 Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, Souhami L, Hirschfeld A, Dinapoli R, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27:1231-1239.   DOI
14 Stanley J, Breitman K, Dunscombe P, Spencer DP, Lau H. Evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery conformity indices for 170 target volumes in patients with brain metastases. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:3449.
15 Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull. 1945;1:80-83.   DOI
16 Arjomandy B, Tailor R, Anand A, Sahoo N, Gillin M, Prado K, et al. Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies. Med Phys. 2010;37:1942-1947.   DOI
17 Mackie TR, Balog J, Ruchala K, Shepard D, Aldridge S, Fitchard E, et al. Tomotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999;9:108-117.   DOI