Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2014.25.3.185

Analysis of Output Constancy Checks Using Process Control Techniques in Linear Accelerators  

Oh, Se An (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center)
Yea, Ji Woon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center)
Kim, Sang Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center)
Lee, Rena (Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Sung Kyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center)
Publication Information
Progress in Medical Physics / v.25, no.3, 2014 , pp. 185-192 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results for the quality assurance through a statistical analysis on the output characteristics of linear accelerators belonging to Yeungnam University Medical Center by using the Shewhart-type chart, Exponentially weighted moving average chart (EWMA) chart, and process capability indices $C_p$ and $C_{pk}$. To achieve this, we used the output values measured using respective treatment devices (21EX, 21EX-S, and Novalis Tx) by medical physicists every month from September, 2012 to April, 2014. The output characteristics of treatment devices followed the IAEA TRS-398 guidelines, and the measurements included photon beams of 6 MV, 10 MV, and 15 MV and electron beams of 4 MeV, 6 MeV, 9 MeV, 12 MeV, 16MeV, and 20 MeV. The statistical analysis was done for the output characteristics measured, and was corrected every month. The width of control limit of weighting factors and measurement values were calculated as ${\lambda}=0.10$ and L=2.703, respectively; and the process capability indices $C_p$ and $C_{pk}$ were greater than or equal to 1 for all energies of the linear accelerators (21EX, 21EX-S, and Novalis Tx). Measured values of output doses with drastic and minor changes were found through the Shewhart-type chart and EWMA chart, respectively. The process capability indices $C_p$ and $C_{pk}$ of the treatment devices in our institution were, respectively, 2.384 and 2.136 for 21EX, 1.917 and 1.682 for 21EX-S, and 2.895 and 2.473 for Novalis Tx, proving that Novalis Tx has the most stable and accurate output characteristics.
Keywords
Output characteristics; Linear accelerator; Quality assurance; Process capability; Processability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nordstrom F, Wetterstedt S, Johnsson S, Ceberg C, Back SAJ: Control chart analysis of data from a multicenter monitor unit verification study. Radiother Oncol 102(3):364.70 (2012)
2 Carey RG and Lloyd RC: Measuring quality improvement in healthcare: a guide to statistical process control application. Wisconsin, WI: Quality Press (2001)
3 Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al: Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 36(9):4197-212 (2009)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Grattan MW and Hounsell AR: Analysis of output trends from Varian 2100C/D and 600C/D accelerators. Phys Med Biol 56(1):N11-N19 (2011)
5 Reynolds MR and Stoumbos ZG: Should exponentially weighted moving average and cumulative sum charts be used with Shewhart limits Technometrics 47(4):409-24 (2005)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Oh SA, Kang MK, Kim SK, Yea JW: Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Techniques in Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery with International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium Consensus Guidelines. Prog. Med. Phys. 24(3):145-153 (2013)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Andreo P, Burns D T, Hohlfeld K, et al: Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international Code of Practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water IAEA Technical Report Series No 398 IAEA, Vienna (2000)
8 Boyer A, Biggs P, Galvin J, et al: Basic applications of multileaf collimators. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 50. Med Phys (2001)
9 ICRU Report 83: Prescribing, recording and reporting photon- beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 10:1-106 (2010)
10 Sanghangthum T, Suriyapee S, Srisatit S, Pawlicki T: Retrospective analysis of linear accelerator output constancy checks using process control techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(1):147-60 92013)   DOI
11 Ekaette E, Lee RC, Cooke DL, Iftody S, Craighead P: Probabilistic fault tree analysis of a radiation treatment system. Risk Analysis 27(6):1395-410 (2007)   DOI
12 Huq MS, Fraass BA, Dunscombe PB, et al: A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(1 Suppl):S170-S173 (2008)   DOI
13 Pawlicki T, Whitaker M, Boyer A: Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance. Med Phys 32(9):2777-86 (2005)   DOI
14 Tennant R, Mohammed MA, Coleman JJ, Martin U: Monitoring patients using control charts: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 19(4):187-94 (2007)   DOI