Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2022.12.38.4.65

A Study on the Priority of Sustainability Areas and Indicators of Domestic Smart Ports  

Lee, Jae-Hoon (한국해양대학교 대학원 해운경영학과)
Chang, Myung-Hee (한국해양대학교 해양경영경제학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Port Economic Association / v.38, no.4, 2022 , pp. 65-85 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, in order to derive the priority of indicators and sustainability areas of smart ports, which means ports in the digital era, previous studies and ESG, which have recently been indispensably introduced in all industries worldwide, were studied together. A hierarchical structure was established with upper evaluation items and 20 lower evaluation items in four areas (operational, environmental, social, and governance), and a relative evaluation method of weighting items among the AHP techniques was applied. The pairwise comparison questionnaire consisted of a 9-point scale proposed by Satty (1980). A survey was conducted targeting working-level workers who perform sustainability or ESG(Environmental, Social, Governance)-related work at four representative port authorities in Korea (Busan, Incheon, Ulsan, Yeosu Gwangyang). In order to increase the accuracy of the analysis results, AHP analysis was conducted on 17 questionnaires with a consistency ratio of 0.1 or less. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that among the four areas representing the sustainability of domestic smart ports, the operation area had the highest priority, followed by the environment area. In addition, looking at the overall priorities for the 20 detailed indicators, indicators such as operational efficiency, operational planning, energy management, and pollution measurement and management system were found to have high priority. On the other hand, it was confirmed that the social and the governance areas had relatively low importance compared to other areas.
Keywords
Smart Port; Sustainability; ESG; Indicators of Sustainability; Priority;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 14  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 UNCTAD(1992), Port Marketing and The Challenge of The Third Generation Port.
2 UNCTAD(1999), The Fourth Generation Port, UNCTAD Ports Newsletter.
3 Wan, C., Zhang, D., Yan, X., and Yang, Z.(2018), A Novel Model For The Quantitative Evaluation Of Green Port Development; A Case Study Of Major Ports In China, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 431-443.   DOI
4 Xu, G., and Dadi, Z.(2020), Study On Evaluation System Of Green Port Development, E3S Web of Conferences, 194, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019405012.   DOI
5 Yau, K. L. A., Peng, S., Qadir, J., Low, Y. C., and Ling, M. H.(2020), Towards Smart Port Infrastructures: Enhancing Port Activities Using Information And Communications Technology, IEEE Access, 8, 83387-83404.   DOI
6 Yen, B. T. H., Huang, M. J., Ju, H., Lai, H., Cho, H., and Huang, Y. L.(2022), How Smart Port Design Influences Port Efficiency ; A DEA-Tobit Approach, Research in Transportation Business & Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100862.   DOI
7 강신욱 외(2012), 사회통합지수 개발연구, 세종 : 사회통합위원회 한국보건사회연구원.
8 강영문(2017), 제4차 산업혁명과 물류교육에 관한 연구, 물류학회지, 제27권 제2호, 1-8.
9 기획재정부(2021), 무디스, 환경.사회.지배구조 (ESG) 국가별 평가 결과 발표 - 한국, 최고등급(1등급) 평가(전세계 상위 11개국에 포함) -.
10 김시현(2015), 국제항만 운영에서 지속가능한 항만경쟁력 확보방안, 한국항만경제학회지, 제31집 제3호, 61-74.
11 김우호.심기섭.장정인(2008), 항만의 경쟁력 평가모형 구축과 활용방안에 관한 연구, 서울 : 한국해양수산개발원.
12 김주혜.김율성(2021), 부산항 스마트 기술의 도입 우선순위 분석-항만터미널과 항만 배후단지를 중심으로, 한국해운물류학회, 제37권 제3호, 601~621.
13 김지안(2021), 국내 스마트 항만 정책 개선방안에 관한 비교 연구, 성균관대학교 석사학위논문.
14 김형근(2018), 중국 로보틱 항만 현황과 우리나라 자동화 항만 구축 필요성 연구, 중국학, 제64호, 283-296.
15 노세연.이주호.장현미.윤원영(2016), 항만의 지속가능한 개발.운영: TBL을 중심으로, 한국해운물류학회, 제32권 제3호, 473~495.
16 류형근.이홍걸.이철영(2007), 항만의 정보화 수준 제고를 위한 통합평가지수 개발에 관한 탐색적 연구, 한국항해항만학회지, 제31권 제6호, 491-496.   DOI
17 박임수.안이슬(2019), 사회적 가치 분류체계 연구: 공기업(K-water)을 중심으로, 기업경영리류, 제10권 제2호, 333-350.
18 박주동.이종필.이기열.김성기.김성아.이주원.박상원.김형태(2020), 지속가능한 해상운송을 위한 항만시설 경쟁력 수준 평가체계 구축, 전자무역연구, 제18권 제2호, 23-41.   DOI
19 박호.이주호.장현미(2016), TBL을 활용한 항만의 지속가능성 평가에 관한 연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제32집 제4호, 211-220.
20 백해헌(2022), 지방자치단체의 ESG 행정 비교분석 ; 서울 특별시 자치구를 중심으로, 경희대학교 석사학위논문.
21 손용정(2016), 친환경항만 구축을 위한광양항 환경관리 평가 지표 우선순위에 대한연구, 무역통상학회지, 제16권 제3호, 247-262.
22 부산항만공사(2022), 2021부산항만공사 지속가능경영보고서, 부산 : 부산항만공사.
23 산업통상자원부(2019), "K-ESG 가이드라인", 세종: 산업통상자원부, 2019.
24 손득수.김용덕.이성기(2021), 공공기관의 ESG 지배구조(G) 추진 전략: 대한무역투자진흥공사 사례를 중심으로, 서비스경영학회지, 제22권 제5호. 159-183.
25 여수광양항만공사(2022), 여수광양항만공사 2021 ESG 경영보고서, 광양 : 여수광양항만공사.
26 울산항만공사(2020), 울산항만공사 2020- 2021 지속가능경영보고서, 울산 : 울산항만공사.
27 이언경.강무홍.이수영.강한석.전하림(2017), 4차 산업혁명시대 항만물류산업 고도화 방안 연구, 부산 : 한국해양수산개발원, 2017.
28 이언경(2018), KMI 국제물류위클리(제440호), 부산 : 한국해양수산개발원, 2018.
29 이언경.이수영(2019), 4차 산업혁명시대 국내 스마트항만 수준 측정과 비교분석, 해운물류연구, 제35권 제2호, 323-348.   DOI
30 이재환(2022), 국내 컨테이너 터미널 효율성 및 스마트항만 지표 도입 수준 비교 분석, 인천대학교 석사학위논문.
31 이주호.김상열.장현미(2016), 항만의 지속가능성 측정 요인에 관한 사례 연구 : SuPorts와 PPRISM 사례를 중심으로, 한국항해항만학회지, 제40권 제6호, 413~420.   DOI
32 이태휘(2020), 스마트항만의 해외사례 분석과 정책 시사점: 유럽과 싱가포르를 중심으로, 한국항만경제학회지, 제36집 제1호, 77-90.
33 이홍걸(2007), 컨테이너 터미널의 정보보호 수준 제고를 위한 통합 평가지수 개발에 관한 연구, 해운물류연구, 제54호, 99-118.   DOI
34 이홍걸(2006), 항만경쟁력지수 개발에 관한 연구, 경상남도 : 경남발전연구원, 2006.
35 인천항만공사(2021), 인천항만공사 ESG보고서2020, 인천 : 인천항만공사.
36 정태원(2018), 스마트 항만의 선진사례 분석과 시사점, 해운물류연구, 제100권 제3호, 489-510.
37 임종혁.전달영(2018), 공유가치창출에 대한 국내 문헌 분석 및 제언, 사회적 경제와 정책연구, 제8권 제1호, 53-87.
38 장명희(2018), 블록체인이 가져올 해운물류의 변화방향, 한국인터넷전자상거래학회 추계학술대회발표논문집, 363-366.
39 장명희(2021), 해상운송분야의 디지털 전환 성공요인에 대한 우선순위 평가에 관한 연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제37집, 제4호, 103-126.
40 조용철(2019), 스마트 항만의 국내외 서비스 사례 연구, 대한안전경영과학회 춘계학술대회, 83-106.
41 조현성(2022), 광양항 스마트기술 도입 우선순위 분석 연구, 한국해양대학교 석사학위논문.
42 차재웅(2020), 항만 스마트 지수 개발에 관한 연구, 한국해양대학교 석사학위논문.
43 최상희(2012), 미래를 선도하는 스마트 항만물류기술, 전자공학회지, 제39권 제5호, 39-46.
44 최상희(2018), 항만.물류트렌드와 스마트포트, 미래 항만, 경남발전, 145호, 32-42.
45 최형림.김두환.조민제.이강배(2018), 4차 산업혁명과 해운항만물류산업의 대응 방안, 한국통신학회논문지, 제43권 제9호, 1540-1549.
46 한국거래소 ESG포털, ESG 개념, https://esg.krx.co.kr/
47 한국과학기술기획평가원(2019), 세계경제포럼(WEF)의 세계경쟁력보고서 2018 분석 - 과학기술관련 부문 중심으로, 충청북도 : 한국과학기술기획평가원, 2019.
48 한국해양수산개발원(2018a), KMI동향분석(vol.74) : 스마트항만(Smart Port), 전체 물류망을 고려한 로드맵 수립 필요, 부산 : 한국해양수산개발원.
49 한국해양수산개발원(2018b), 국외출장결과보고서, 부산 : 한국해양수산개발원.
50 한국해양수산개발원(2019), 항만인프라 경쟁력수준 평가 및 개발기준 마련 연구, 부산 : 한국해양수산개발원.
51 Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., and Olcer, A. I.(2021), Revisiting Port Sustainability As A Foundation For The Implementation Of The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals(UN SDGs), Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6(19), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00101-6.   DOI
52 해양수산부(2019), 제2차 신항만건설기본계획, 세종: 해양수산부.
53 해양수산부(2020), 제4차('21~'31) 전국항만기본계획, 세종: 해양수산부.
54 울산항만공사 공식 블로그, 항만에 스마트를 더하면? - 로테르담, 함부르크, 싱가포르, https://blog.naver.com/ulsan-port
55 Arof, A. Md., Zakaria, A., and Rahman, N. S. F. A.(2021), Green Port Indicators: A Review, Advanced Engineering for Processes and Technologies II, 237-256.
56 Asgari, N., Hassani, A. Jones, D., and Nguye, H. H.(2015), Sustainability Ranking Of The UK Major Ports: Methodology And Case Study, Transportation Research Part E, 78, 19-39.   DOI
57 Botti, A., Monda, A., Pellicano, M., and Torre, C.(2017), The Re-Conceptualization of The Port Supply Chain as a Smart Port Service System: The Case of The Port of Salerno, System, 5(35), https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5020035.   DOI
58 Boullauazan, Y., Sys, C., and Vanelslander, T.(2022), Developing and Demonstrating a Maturity Model for Smart Ports, Maritime Policy & Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2074161.   DOI
59 Caldeira dos Santos, M. and Pereira, F. H.(2022), ESG Performance Scoring Method to Support Responsible Investments in Port Operations, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 664-673.   DOI
60 Chen, J., Huang, T., Xie, X., Lee, P. T. W. and Hua, C.(2019). Constructing Governance Framework of a Green and Smart Port, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7040083.   DOI
61 Egoloff, C., Sanders, U., Georgaki, K. and Riedl, J.(2018), The Digital Imperative in Container Shipping. The Boston Consulting Group.
62 Connelly, S.(2007), Mapping Sustainable Development As A Contested Concept, The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 12(3), 259-278.
63 Deloitte(2017), Smart Ports Point Of View.
64 Douaioui, K., Fri, M., and Semma, C. M. E. A.(2018), Smart Port: Design And Perspectives, 2018 4th International Conference on Logistics Operations Management(GOL), 1-6.
65 Elkington, J., and Rowlands, I. H.(1999), Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42-43.
66 Elzarka, S., and Elgazzar, S.(2014), Green Port Performance Index For Sustainable Ports In Egypt: A Fuzzy AHP Approach, The 7th International Forum on Shipping, Ports, and Airports(IFSPA 2014).
67 ESCAP(2020), Sustainable Port Development and Improving Port Productivity in Escap Member Countries.
68 Galliers, R. D., and Sutherland, A.(1991), Information Systems Management And Strategy Formulation: 'The Stages of Growth' Model Revisited, Information Systems Journal, 1(2), 89-114.   DOI
69 Gonzalez, A. R., Cancelas, N. G., Serrano, B. M., and Orive, A. C.(2020), Preparation Of A Smart Port Indicator And Calculation Of A Ranking For The Spanish Port System, Logistics, 4(2), https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4020009.   DOI
70 Gonzalez-Laxe, F., Bermudez, F.M., Palmero, F.M., and Novo-Corti, I.(2016), Sustainability And The Spanish Port System. Analysis Of The Relationship Between Economic And Environmental Indicators, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 232-239.
71 Karas, A.(2020), Smart Port as a Key to The Future Development of Modern Ports, TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 14(1), 27-31.   DOI
72 Hua, C., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Xu, L., Bai, Y., Zheng, T., and Fei, Y.(2020), Evaluation And Governance Of Green Development Practice Of Port: A Sea Port Case Of China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019. 119434.   DOI
73 Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., and Torrisi1, V.(2020), A Sustainable Framework For The Analysis Of Port Systems, European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, 78, https://doi.org/10.48295 /ET.2020.78.7.   DOI
74 ITU-T Y.2060(2012), Overview of the Internet of Things.
75 Li, S., Ma, Z., Han, P., Zhao, S., Guo, P., and Dai, H.(2018), Bring Intelligence To Ports Based On Internet Of Things, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security, Haikou, China, 11067, 128-137.
76 Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., and Beresford, A.(2019), Port Sustainability and Performance : A Systematic Literature Review, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 47-64.   DOI
77 Lirn, T. C., Wu, Y. C. J., and Chen, Y. J.(2013), Green Performance Criteria For Sustainable Ports In Asia, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(5/6), 427-451.   DOI
78 Lu, C. S., Shang, K. C. and Lin, C. C.(2016), Examining Sustainability Performance At Ports: Port Managers' Perspectives On Developing Sustainable Supply Chains, The Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research, 43(8), 909-927.
79 Min, H.(2022), Developing a Smart Port Architecture and Essential Elements In The Era of Industry 4.0, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 24, 189-207.   DOI
80 Molavi, A., Lim, G. J., and Race, B.(2020), A Framework For Building A Smart Port And Smart Port Index, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(9), 686-700.   DOI
81 Molina-Serrano, B., Gonzalez-Cancelas, N., and Soler-Flores, F.(2020), Analysis of The Port Sustainability Parameters Through Bayesian Networks, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100030.   DOI
82 Muangpan, T., and Suthiwartnarueput, K.(2019), Key Performance Indicators of Sustainable Port: Case Study of The Eastern Economic Corridor In Thailand, Cogent Business & Management, 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1603275.   DOI
83 Othman, A., El-Gazzar, S., and Knez, M.(2022), A Framework For Adopting A Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index, Sustainability, 14(8), https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084551.   DOI
84 Paulauskas, V., Dawidowicz, F. L. and Paulauskas, D.(2021), Ports Digitalization Level Evaluation, Sensors, 21(18), https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186134.   DOI
85 Philipp, R.(2020), Digital Readiness Index Assessment Towards Smart Port Development, Sustainability Management Forum / Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 28, 49-60.   DOI
86 Rasche, A., Morsing, M. and Moon, J.(2017), Corporate Social Responsibility, Cambridge University Press.
87 Ravn, V.(2021), The Port Environmental Performance Index: Development of a Framework for Strategic Assessment of Port Environmental Performance, Thesis for: Master of Faculty of Technology in University of South-Eastern Norway, 2021.
88 Sankla, W., and Muangpan, T.(2022), Smart and Sustainable Port Performance in Thailand: A Conceptual Model, Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(4), https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v15n4p1.   DOI
89 Stankovic, J. J., Marjanovic, I., Papathanasiou, J., and Drezgic, S.(2021), Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Port Regions: MCDM Approach In Composite Index Creation, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(1), https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jmse9010074.   DOI
90 Secretariat, U.(2015), Sustainable Freight Transport Systems: Opportunities for Developing Countries, In Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, Switzerland, 14-16 October.
91 Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sorensen, C.(2010), Desperately Seeking The Infrastructure In is Research: Conceptualization of 'Digital Convergence' As Co-Evolution Of Social And Technical Infrastructures, IEEE, 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS. 2010.141.   DOI