Browse > Article

A study on Perception and Response Strategy of Korean Ship Owners on Global Sulphur Cap 2020  

Lee, Choong-Ho (중앙대학교 해운물류학과)
Kim, Hyun-Jung (중앙대학교 무역물류학과)
Park, keun-Sik (중앙대학교 국제물류학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Port Economic Association / v.34, no.4, 2018 , pp. 141-160 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, to analyze the perception and response strategy of Korean ship owners on Global Sulphur Cap 2020, examined the IMO environmental regulation status focusing on MARPOL Annex VI regulation about air pollution prevention, technological measures to reduce SOx emission, shipping industry and management status of Korean ship owners. First of all, the questionnaire was conducted for Korean ship owners after selecting the evaluation factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of the perception and response strategy of Korean ship owners by corporation size and main vessel type using frequency and cross analysis. It is confirmed that various researches on SOx emission reduction have been carried out from various points of view at home and abroad. In this study, existing studies related to technical factors for regulatory response and economics analysis were examined and evaluation factors were selected. As a result of analysis, it is found that large-sized shipping companies are more prepared for regulatory response than small and medium-sized bulk carrier owners. There were similar perception and the direction of response strategy about the impacts by corporation size and main vessel type. In about two years to be implemented in 2020, It is necessary to find an appropriate response strategy based on the support policy of the government and related organizations and the systematic analysis of the ship owners. Through this study, although the difference between the perception and response strategy of the ship owners by corporation size and main vessel type was understood, it was found that there were limitations on specific response strategy and corporate data collection. In future research, we should overcome the limitations of this study and conduct an in-depth study.
Keywords
SOx emission reduction; Korean ship owners; Rerception; Response strategy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Nikopoulou, Zoi, Kevin Cullinane & Arne Jensen(2013), "The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NOx and SOx emissions: Prospects and benefits for ships within the Northern European ECA, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 227(2).
2 Pimentel, David, Lori Lach, Rodolfo Zuniga & Doug Morrison(2000), Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States, BioScience, 50(1).
3 Shell Trading and Supply(2017), LNG as a Marine Fuel, Shell Technical Conference, 23-24th March.
4 Wilcove, David S., David Rothstein, Jason Dubow, Ali Phillips & Elizabeth Losos(1998), Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States, BioScience, 48(8).
5 강영민(2018), 세계 해운시장 동향과 대응방안, 해양한국, 제2018호 제1호.
6 김승섭(2016), 2015 국적선사(90 개사) 경영실적, 해양한국, 제2016권 제5호.
7 김연태(2018), 선박황산화물배출규제 협약(Sulphur Cap 2020) 연기될 것인가?, 해양한국, 제2018호, 제3호.
8 김우호, 김수엽, 이건우(2012), IMO 온실가스 시장기반조치(MBM) 대응 방안 연구, 한국해양수산개발원.
9 박재영(2017), 해운기업의 황산화물(SOx) 배출저감 최적대안에 대한 연구, 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발대학원 석사학위논문.
10 김윤주(2017), IMO 탄소배출권거래제도 도입이 국내 해상 운송기업에 미치는 경제적 영향, 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발대학원 석사학위논문.
11 서윤희(2011), 선사의 녹색해운에 대한 인식수준과 전략에 관한 연구, 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발대학원 석사학위논문.
12 신원용(2014), 해운 및 조선업의 환경 규제대응에 관한 인식연구, 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발대학원 석사학위논문.
13 최재선, 김민수(2010), 환경 규제에서 살아남기, 해양국토21, 제6권.
14 이건호, 송무석(2008), 해양에서 황산화물 오염 규제에 대한 소고, 한국해양환경.에너지학회지, 제11권 제4호.
15 임종관, 이언경, 김찬호, 김정현, 최중희, & 김은수(2010), 녹색해운 전망과 대응전략, 한국해양수산개발원.
16 전용준(2014), 해운 시황 변화에 따른 한국 해운 기업의 경영 전략 연구, 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발 대학원 석사학위논문.
17 최재선, 육근형(2004), 국제해사기구(IMO)의 해양환경 오염규제 대응방안 연구, 한국해양수산개발원.
18 한국선급 기술개발팀(2017), 강화된 Global SOx 규제 대응을 위한 선주지침서, 한국선급.
19 한철(2013), 해상운송사업자에 대한 온실가스 규제, 과학기술법연구, 제19권 제3호.
20 황진희(2014), 국적선사 없이 수출 경제대국 가능한가?, 해양항국, 제2014권 제1호.
21 Luo, Meifeng(2013), Emission reduction in international shipping-the hidden side effects, Maritime Policy & Management, 40(7).