Browse > Article

Volatility of Export Volume and Export Value of Gwangyang Port  

Mo, Soo-Won (목포대학교 무역학과)
Lee, Kwang-Bae (순천대학교 물류학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Port Economic Association / v.31, no.1, 2015 , pp. 1-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
The standard GARCH model imposing symmetry on the conditional variance, tends to fail in capturing some important features of the data. This paper, hence, introduces the models capturing asymmetric effect. They are the EGARCH model and the GJR model. We provide the systematic comparison of volatility models focusing on the asymmetric effect of news on volatility. Specifically, three diagnostic tests are provided: the sign bias test, the negative size bias test, and the positive size bias test. This paper shows that there is significant evidence of GARCH-type process in the data, as shown by the test for the Ljung-Box Q statistic on the squared residual data. The estimated unconditional density function for squared residual is clearly skewed to the left and markedly leptokurtic when compared with the standard normal distribution. The observation of volatility clustering is also clearly reinforced by the plot of the squared value of residuals of export volume and values. The unconditional variance of both export volumes and export value indicates that large shocks of either sign tend to be followed by large shocks, and small shocks of either sign tend to follow small shocks. The estimated export volume news impact curve for the GARCH also suggests that $h_t$ is overestimated for large negative and positive shocks. The conditional variance equation of the GARCH model for export volumes contains two parameters ${\alpha}$ and ${\beta}$ that are insignificant, indicating that the GARCH model is a poor characterization of the conditional variance of export volumes. The conditional variance equation of the EGARCH model for export value, however, shows a positive sign of parameter ${\delta}$, which is contrary to our expectation, while the GJR model exhibits that parameters ${\alpha}$ and ${\beta}$ are insignificant, and ${\delta}$ is marginally significant. That indicates that the asymmetric volatility models are poor characterization of the conditional variance of export value. It is concluded that the asymmetric EGARCH and GJR model are appropriate in explaining the volatility of export volume, while the symmetric standard GARCH model is good for capturing the volatility.
Keywords
GARCH; EGARCH; GJR;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nelson, D.(1990), Stationarity and Persistence in the GARCH (1,1) Model, Econometric Theory, 6, 318-334.   DOI
2 Nelson, D.(1991), Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach, Econometrica, 59, 347-370.   DOI
3 Pagan, A. and G. Schwert(1990), Alternative Models for Common Stock Volatility, Journal of Econometrics, 45, 267-290.
4 Poon, S.H. and C. Granger(2003), Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review, Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 478-539.   DOI
5 Rapach, D.E. and J.K. Struass(2008), Structural Breaks and GARCH Models of Exchange Rate Volatility, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 65-90.   DOI
6 Schwert, G.W.(1990), Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87, Review of Financial Studies, 3, 77-102.   DOI
7 김창범(2010), 환위험과 경기불확실성이 우리나라의 수입물동량에 미치는 영향, 한국항만경제학회지, 제26집 제4호, 88-103.
8 모수원.이광배(2014), BDI의 변동성 추정: 레버리지 GARCH 모형을 중심으로, 한국항만경제학회지, 제30집 제3호, 1-14.
9 최병옥.김원태(2007), 참외 주산지와 도매시장 가격의 동태적 인과성 분석, 농촌경제, 제30권 제3호, 69-85.
10 최봉호(2007), 환율변동성과 컨테이너 물동량과의 관계, 한국항만경제학회지, 제23집 제1호, 1-18.
11 Bollerslev, T.(1986), Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.   DOI
12 Andrew, M. and Meen, G.(2003), House Price Appre ciation, Transaction and Structural Change in the British Housing Market: A Macroeconomic Perspective, Real Estate Economics, 31(1), 99-116.   DOI
13 Berg, L. and J. Lyhagen(1998), Short and Long-Run Dependency in Swedish Stock Returns, Applied Financial Economics, 18, 435-443.
14 Black, F.(1976), Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes, Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 177-181.
15 Bollerslev, T., R. Chou, and K. Kroner(1986), ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59.
16 Campbell, J. and L. Hentschel(1992), No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 381-318.   DOI
17 Chou, R.(1988), Volatility Persistence and Stock Valuations: Some Empirical Evidence Using GARCH, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3, 279-294.   DOI
18 Christie, A.(1982), The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variance: Value, Leverage and Interest Rate Effects, Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 407-432.   DOI
19 Ederington, L.H. and W. Guan(2005), Forecasting Volatility, Journal of Futures Markets, 25(5), 465-490.   DOI
20 Engle, R.F.(1993), Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
21 Engle, R.F. and V.K. Ng(1993), Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility, Journal of Finance, 48, 1749-1778.   DOI
22 Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.M., and Robinson, R.P.(1987), Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: the ARCH-M Model, Econometrica, 55, 391-407.   DOI
23 Engle, R.(1984), Wald Likelihood Ratio, and Lagrange Multiplier Tests in Econometrics, in: Z. Grrliches and M.D. Intrigator, eds.: Handbook of Econometrics, 2, North Holland, Amsterdam.
24 Engle, R., and D. Kraft(1983), Multiperiod Forecast Error Variances of Inflation Estimated from ARCH Models, in A. Zellner, ed.: Applied Time Series Analysis of Economic Data, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., 293-302.
25 French, K., G.W. Schwert, and R. Stambaugh (1987), Expected Stock Returns and Volatility, Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 3-29.   DOI
26 Glosten, L., R. Jaganathan, and D. Runkle(1993), On the Relation Between the Expected Value and Volatility of The Nominal Excess Return on Stocks, Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801.   DOI
27 Rivera, G., T-H. Lee, and S. Mishra(2004), Forecasting Volatility: A Reality Check Based on Option Pricing, Utility Function, Value-at-Risk, and Predictive Likelihood, International Journal of Forecasting, 20, 629-645.   DOI
28 Henry, O.(1998), Modelling the Asymmetry of Stock Market Volatility, Applied Financial Economics, 8, 145-153.   DOI
29 Hillebrand, E.(2005), Neglecting Parameter Changes in GARCH Models, Journal of Econometrics, 129, 121-138.   DOI
30 Lin, A.Y.(2006), Has the Asian Crisis Changed the Role of Foreign Investor in Emerging Equity Markets: Taiwan's Experience, International Review of Economics and Finance, 15, 364-382.   DOI
31 Lopez, J.(2001), Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Volatility Models, Journal of Forecasting, 20, 87-109.   DOI
32 Merton, R.C.(1980), On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 323-361.   DOI
33 Mikosch, T. and C. Starica(2004), Non-stati onarities in Financial Time Series, the Long-Range Dependence, and the IGARCH Effects, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 378-390.   DOI
34 Miller, N. and Peng, L.(2004), Exploring Metropolitan Housing Price Volatility, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(1), 5-18.   DOI
35 Milunovich, G. and S. Thorp(2006), Valuing Volatility Spillovers, Global Finance Journal, 17, 1-22.   DOI
36 Miyakoshi, T.(2003), Spillovers of Stock Return Volatility to Asian Equity Markets from Japan the US, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 13, 383-399.   DOI
37 Mougoue, M. and Aggarwal, R.(2011), Trading Volume and Exchange Rate Volatility: Evidence for the Sequential Arrival of Information Hypothesis, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(10), 2690-2703.   DOI
38 Naoui, K., Liouane, N. and Brahim, S.(2010), A Dynamic Conditional Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: The Case of the Subprime Credit Crisis, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3), 85-96.