Browse > Article

Operational Efficiency Analysis of ODCYs as Logistic Facilities in the Hinterland of Busan North Port : Based on DEA Modeling  

Seo, Dong-Gyun (동아대학교 경영대학 국제무역학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Port Economic Association / v.27, no.4, 2011 , pp. 51-71 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to use DEA modeling to make an analysis on 12 ODCYs in the hinterland of Busan North Port, so that it may propose possible ways to efficiently operate them. For analysis, this study adopted 3 input factors such as CY area, number of employees and number of cargo work equipments and also adopted 1 output factor, i.e. container throughput. According to the analysis DEA-CCR model, it was found that Chunil(YongDang CY) was the most efficient one among companies engaged in the operation of ODCY. And it was found that KCTC(YongDang CY), Kukbo(U-Am CY), KORAIL(BusanJin CY) and Hanjin (JaeSong CY) would need to boost the container throughput 5 or more times higher than current throughput with a view to improving cargo handling efficiency, while Sebang(U-Am CY), KCTC(U-Am CY), KCTC(YongDang CY), Hyopsung(YongDang CY) and Kukbo(U-Am CY) need to work on personnel restructuring targeted to current employees. Based on the analysis DEA-BCC model, it was found that Chunil(YongDang CY), Dongbu(ShinYoung GamMan CY), Intergis(GamMan CY) and Sebang(U-Am CY) were efficient companies, but KCTC(YongDang CY), Kukbo(U-Am CY), KORAIL(BusanJin CY) and Hanjin(JaeSong CY) were inefficient companies. Particularly, it was found that both KCTC(U-Am CY) and Kukbo(U-Am CY) would need to try harder to carry out personnel reshuffle than other comparable companies.
Keywords
ODCY(Off-Dock CY); DEA; Scale Efficiency; Projection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 관세청, 행정규칙입안예고 : 보세화물 입출항 하선 하기 및 적재에 관한 고시 개정, 2011.
2 류동근, "국내 컨테이너 전용터미널의 효율성 비교 : DEA 접근",해운물류연구, 제47호, 2005, 21-38.
3 모수원, "국내항만의 효율성 결정요소", 한국항만경제학회지, 제24집 제4호, 2008, 351-353.
4 모수원․이광배, "부산항과 광양항의 컨테이너터미널의 효율성",한국항만경제학회지, 제26집 제2호, 2010, 141-147.
5 박노경․박길영, "항만효율성 측정자료의 정규성과 변환불변성 검증 소고 : DEA접근",한국항만경제학회지, 제23집 제2호, 2007, 111-118.
6 전국화물자동차운송사업연합회, "컨테이너 육상운송 요율표", 2011.
7 Banker, R. D., Charnesand, A. and Cooper, W. W., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, Vol. 30, 1984, 1078-1092.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Barros, C. P., "Incentive Regulation and Efficiency of Portuguese Port Authorities," Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2003, 429-444.
9 Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. L., "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units," European J ournal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, 1978, 429-444.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Park, R. K. and De, P., "An Alternative Approach to Efficiency Measurement of Seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2004, 53-69.
11 Tongzon, J., "Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and other International Ports using Data Envelopment Analysis," Transportation Research, Part A 35, 2001, 107-122.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Valantine, V. C. and Gray, R., "Competition of Hub Ports: A Comparison between Europe and the Far East," Proceedings of the 2nd International Gwangyang Port Forum and International Conference for the 20th Anniversary of Korean Association of Shipping Studies, Korean Association of Shipping Studies, April, 2002, 161-176.