[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.20910/JASE.2021.15.4.64

Operational Risk Assessment for Airworthiness Certification of Military Unmanned Aircraft Systems using the SORA Method

Namgung, Pyeong (Department of Military Studies, Graduate School, Daejeon University)
Eom, Jeongho (Department of Military Studies, Graduate School, Daejeon University)
Kwon, Taehwa (Korea Institute of Aviation Safety Technology)
Jeon, Seungmok (Korea Institute of Aviation Safety Technology)

Publication Information

Journal of Aerospace System Engineering / v.15, no.4, 2021 , pp. 64-74 More about this Journal

Abstract

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) are rapidly emerging not only as a key military power, such as surveillance and reconnaissance for military purposes but also as a new air transportation means in the form of Urban Air Mobility (UAM). Currently, airworthiness certification is carried out focused on the verification of technical standards for flight safety suitability of aircraft design in accordance with the Military Aircraft Flight Safety Certification Act and does not employ the model for operational risk assessment for mission areas and airspace. In this study, in order to evaluate the risk of the mission area from the perspective of the UAS operator, a risk assessment simulation has been conducted by applying the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) model to the operating environment of the Korean military UAS. Also, the validity of the SORA model has been verified through the analysis of simulation results, and a new application plan for airworthiness certification of the military unmanned aerial system has been presented.

Keywords

UAS(Unmanned Aircraft System); UAM(Urban Air Mobility); JARUS(Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on Unmanned Systems); SORA(Specific Operations Risk Assessment); Airworthiness Certification;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	ROK Government, The 3rd aviation industry development Basic plan ('21~'30), Feb 2021.
2	ROK Government, Military Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Act, 1 Aug 2009.
3	EASA, "Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Commission Implementing Regulation", Article 11, pp. 4-6, 2020.
4	US, "Assessing the Risks of Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System", A Consensus Study Report of the National Academies of SCENCES, Committee on Assessing the Risks of UAS Integration Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, pp. 15-16, 2018.
5	EASA, "Policy Statement Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft System", Doc E.Y013-01, Aug 2009. p.13.
6	DAPA, "Military Aircraft Flight Safety Certification Regulation", DAPA Instruction, Number 619, Aug 2020.
7	F. Nikodem, J. S. Dittrich and A. Bierig, "The New SORA Approach for UAS Regulation Compared to Common Civil Aviation Risk", Institute of Flight Systems, pp. 4-6, Sep 2018.
8	JARUS, "JARUS Guidelines on SORA", JAR-DEL-WG6-D.04, Jan 2019.
9	DOD, "System Safety", MIL-STD-882E, May 2012.
10	EU, "On the Rules and Procedures for the Operation of Unmanned Aircraft", Commission Implementing Regulation 2019/947, pp.49-50, May 2019.
11	Christoph Besmer, "The Skies are Open in Switzerland", 「COMMERCIAL UAV NEWS」, https://www.commercialuavnews.com/reports/europe/the-skies-are-open-in-switzerland
12	T. Kwon, S. Jeon, "A Study on SORA Methodology for Risk Assessment of UAS Operations", KSAS 2020 Fall Conference, Jeju, Nov 2020.
13	JARUS, "JARUS Guidelines on SORA Executive Summary", JAR-DEL-WG6-D.04, pp. 2-3, Jan 2019.