Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.01.013

A study on pressurizer cutting scenario for radiation dose reduction for workers using VISIPLAN  

Lee, Hak Yun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Chosun University)
Kim, Sun Il (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Chosun University)
Song, Jong Soon (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.54, no.7, 2022 , pp. 2736-2747 More about this Journal
Abstract
The operations in the design lifecycle of a nuclear power plant targeted to be decommissioned lead to neutron activation. Operations in the decommissioning process include cutting, decontamination, disposal, and processing. Among these, cutting is done close to the target material, and thus workers are exposed to radiation. As there are only a few studies on pressurizers, there arises the need for further research to assess the radiation exposure dose. This study obtained the specifications of the AP1000 pressurizer of Westinghouse and the distribution of radionuclide inventory of a pressurizer in a pressurised water reactor for evaluation based on literature studies. A cutting scenario was created to develop an optimal method so that the cut pieces fill a radioactive solid waste drum with dimensions 0.571 m × 0.834 m. The estimated exposure dose, estimated using the tool VISIPLAN SW, in terms of the decontamination factor (DF) ranged from DF-0 to DF-100, indicating that DF-90 and DF-100 meet the ICRP recommendation on exposure dose 0.0057 mSv/h. At the end of the study, although flame cutting was considered the most efficient method in terms of cutting speed, laser cutting was the most reasonable one in terms of the financial aspects and secondary waste.
Keywords
VISIPLAN; Pressurizer; Cutting; Decontamination factor; External exposure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jianquan Liu, Jigao Zhang, Jingda Shi, Li Dong, Research of PWR Pressurizer Insurge Characteristics on Three-Dimensional Transient Modeling, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8150879.   DOI
2 Westinghouse Technology Systems Manual, Rev 10/08, Section 2.1, USNRC HRTD, 2008.
3 Y.H. Jung, B.S. Choi, Development of Evaluation Technology for the Decommissioning Method of Nuclear Power Plant Core Facilities - Final Report, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2013.
4 I.S. Kang, et al., Regulation on Radioactive Waste Management and Guidelines on the Collection, Packing, and Management of Radioactive Waste, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2005. KAERI/TR-2902/2005.
5 G.N. Choi, J.S. Jeon, Y.W. Kim, Radiation exposure dose on persons engaged in radiation-related industries, J. Korean Soc. Radiol. 6 (1) (2012) 27-37.   DOI
6 C.D. Park, et al., Development of Metal Cutting Technologies for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, 2019.
7 S.I. Kim, H.Y. Lee, W.C. Jung, J.S. Song, Evaluation of Internal Exposure to Radioactive Aerosol generated from plasma melting system using BiDAS code, Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 194 (1) (2021) 9-17, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab061.   DOI
8 S.I. Kim, H.Y. Lee, J.S. Song, A Study on Characteristics and internal exposure evaluation of radioactive aerosols during pipe cutting in decommissioning of nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1088-1098, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.06.010/, 2018.   DOI
9 K.S. Jung, Y.A. Kang, D.K. Lee, K.W. Lee, J.H. Jung, A State of the Art Report on Technologies of a Safety Assessment and a Radioactivity Exposure Assessment for the Decommissioning Process of Nuclear Facilities, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2007. KAERI/AR-782/2007.
10 B. Remenec, S. Dulanska, L. Matal, Determination of difficult to measure radionuclides in primary circuit facilities of NPP V1 Jaslovske Bohunice, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2679-4.   DOI
11 H. Provens, Primary Circuit Contamination in Nuclear Power Plants: Contribution to Occupational Exposure, Institut de radioprotection et de surete nucleaire, 2004.
12 T.B. Yoon, A Study on Corrosion Product Behavior and Mechanism in Domestic Nuclear Power Plants by Using CRUDTRAN, Chosun University, 2015.
13 K.U. Sung, J.W. Na, Y.I. Kim, Derivation of Chemical Treatment Conditions during Reactor Shutdown to Remove CRUD on the Primary Side of Domestic PWR (1), Korean Nuclear Society, Republic of Korea, 1996.
14 Martin Hornacek, Vladimir Necas, Calculation of External Exposure during Dismantling and Segmentation of Steam Generator, IAPGOS, https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.1130165.   DOI
15 Bearbeitet von, Ropert Prince, Radiation protection at Light Water Reactors, 2012, 978 3 642 28387 1.
16 J.M. Pietralik, The role of flow in flow-accelerated corrosion under nuclear power plant conditions, E-Journal of Advanced Maintenance 4 (2) (2012) 63-78.
17 J.W. Winters, AP1000 Design Control Document Revision 18 (Chapter 5), Westinghouse electric company LLC, 2004, pp. 1-23.
18 THERMOCOAX Designs, Tests and Improve Nuclear Heating Solution, THERMOCOAX NUCLEAR, https://www.thermocoax-nuclear.com/heating-solutions/.
19 S.I. Kim, S.S. Shin, J.S. Song, A study on the assessment of treatment technologies for efficient remediation of radioactively-contaminated soil, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol. 14 (3) (2016) 245-251.   DOI
20 T.J. Boal, M. Pinak, Dose Limits to the Lens of the Eye: International Basic Safety Standards and Related Guidance, ICRP 2013 Proceedings, 2013, pp. 112-117.
21 K.J. Kang, et al., Study on the State of the Arts Technologies and Policy Trends for the Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations and Facilities, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2005. KAERI/RR-2608/2005.