1 |
A. Purgstaller, P.O. Gallo, S. Pampanin, K. Bergmeister, Seismic demands on nonstructural components anchored to concrete accounting for structure-fastener-nonstructural interaction (SFNI), Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 6 (2020) 589-606.
|
2 |
T.T. Tran, A.T. Cao Nguyen, T.H.X. Nguyen, D. Kim, Fragility assessment for electric cabinet in nuclear power plant using response surface methodology, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.12.025.
DOI
|
3 |
K. Salman, S.G. Cho, Effect of frequency content of earthquake on the seismic response of interconnected electrical equipment, CivilEng 1 (2020) 198-215.
DOI
|
4 |
ASCE/SEI-7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2013.
|
5 |
R. Sankaranarayanan, R.A. Medina, Acceleration response modification factors for nonstructural components attached to inelastic moment-resisting frame structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 36 (2007) 2189-2210, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.724.
DOI
|
6 |
A. Lucchini, P. Franchin, F. Mollaioli, Uniform hazard floor acceleration spectra for linear structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 46 (2017) 1121-1140, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2847.
DOI
|
7 |
P.Q. Gallo, M. Moghaddasi, S. Pampanin, K. Bergmeister, Shake table tests of post-installed anchors with supplemental damping, ACI Struct. J. (2018) 595-606.
|
8 |
T.J. Sullivan, P.M. Calvi, R. Nascimbene, Towards improved floor spectra estimates for seismic design, Earthq. Struct. 4 (2013) 109-132, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.109.
DOI
|
9 |
A.T. Cao, T.T. Tran, T.H.X. Nguyen, D. Kim, Simplified approach for seismic risk assessment of cabinet facility in nuclear power plants based on cumulative absolute velocity, Nucl. Technol. 206 (2019) 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1696643.
DOI
|
10 |
K. Salman, T.T. Tran, D. Kim, Grouping effect on the seismic response of cabinet facility considering primary-secondary structure interaction, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (2019) 1318-1326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.024.
DOI
|
11 |
K. Salman, T.T. Tran, D. Kim, Seismic capacity evaluation of NPP electrical cabinet facility considering grouping effects, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 57 (2020) 1-13.
DOI
|
12 |
E. Miranda, A. Kazantzi, D. Vamvatsikos, New approach to the design of acceleration-sensitive non-structural elements in buildings, in: Proc., 16th European Conf. On Earthquake Engineering, The European Association for Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2018.
|
13 |
P.Q. Gallo, M. Moghaddasi, S. Pampanin, A.J. Carr, Hysteresis model for concrete anchors subjected to shear loading, ACI Struct. J. (2019) 5-16.
|
14 |
A. Rieder, Seismic Response of Post-installed Anchors in Concrete, Dissertation, Department fur Bautechnik und Naturgefahren Institut fur Konstruktiven Ingenieurb, Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien, 2009.
|
15 |
T.T. Tran, A.T. Cao, D. Kim, S. Chang, Seismic vulnerability of cabinet facility with tuned mass dampers subjected to high- and low-frequency earthquakes, Appl. Sci. 10 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144850.
DOI
|
16 |
J. Hur, Seismic Performance Evaluation of Switchboard Cabinets Using Nonlinear Numerical Models, Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012.
|
17 |
J. Yang, S.K. Rustogi, A. Gupta, Rocking stiffness of mounting arrangement in electrical cabinets and control panels, Nucl. Eng. Des. 219 (Nos. 2-3) (2002) 127-141.
DOI
|
18 |
S. Singh and A. Gupta, "Seismic response of electrical equipment subjected to high-frequency ground motions," Nucl. Eng. Des., Vol. 374, 2021.
|
19 |
S.G. Cho, D. Kim, S.A. Chaudhary, Simplified model for nonlinear seismic response analysis of equipment cabinets in nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Des. 8 (2011) 2750-2757.
|
20 |
A. Gupta, J. Yang, Modified Ritz vector approach for dynamic properties of electrical cabinets and control panels, Nucl. Eng. Des. 217 (2002) 49-62.
DOI
|
21 |
S.G. Cho, A. Gupta, H. K Jeung, G. H So, Generation of ICRS by frequency domain approach considering rocking stiffness at the base of an electrical cabinet, in: Transactions, SMiRT-25, Charlotte NC, USA, August 2019, pp. 4-9.
|
22 |
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage, Report No. FEMA- E74, Washington D.C., NY, 2011.
|
23 |
B.J. Goodno, N.C. Gould, P. Caldwell, P.L. Gould, Effects of the January 2010 haitian earthquake on selected electrical equipment, Earthq. Spectra 27 (2011) 251-276.
DOI
|
24 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.60, Revision 2, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, , MD, USA, 2014.
|
25 |
K. K Bandyopadhyay, C.H. Hofmayer, M.K. Kassir, Seismic Fragility of Nuclear Power Plant Components: Phase 2, Motor Control Center, Switchboard, Panelboard and Power Supply. Long Island (NY): Department of Nuclear Energy, Brookhaven National Laboratory, vol. 2, NUREG/CR-4659, 1987.
|
26 |
S.J. Chang, Y.S. Jeong, S.H. Eem, I.K. Choiand, D.U. Park, Evaluation of MCC seismic response according to the frequency contents through the shake table test, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (4) (2021) 1345-1356.
DOI
|
27 |
M.S. Han, S.G. Cho, K.J. Hong, A. Gupta, Rocking stiffness of electric cabinet considering the local deformation at the base, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, 2018.
|
28 |
G. Rinaldin, C. Amadio, M. Fragiacomo, A component approach for the hysteretic behaviour of connections in cross-laminated wooden structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 13 (2013) 2023-2042.
|
29 |
EC8. Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2010.
|
30 |
C.S.I. SAP2000, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013.
|
31 |
S. Taghavi, E. Miranda, Technical Rep, Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Floor Acceleration Demands in Multi-Story Buildings, No. 162, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, 2006.
|
32 |
E. Miranda, S. Taghavi. A comprehensive study of floor acceleration demands in multi-story buildings. In Proc., ATC & SEI 2009 Conf. On Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. San Francisco: Applied Technology Council and Structural Engineering Institute of ASCE.
|
33 |
S. Ray-Chaudhuri, T.C. Hutchinson, Effect of nonlinearity of frame buildings on peak horizontal floor acceleration, J. Earthq. Eng. 15 (2011) 124-142, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632461003668046.
DOI
|
34 |
A. Purgstaller, Seismic Performance of Post-installed Fasteners in Concrete with Supplemental Damping Device at structure-fastener-nonstructural-(SFN)-level, Dissertation, Department of Structural Engineering and Natural Hazards, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria, 2017.
|
35 |
E.L. Wilson, Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures, fourth ed., Computers and Structures, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
|
36 |
J.J. O'sullivan, W. Djordjevic, Guidelines for Development of In-Cabinet Amplified Response Spectra for Electrical Benchboards and Panels, EPRI NP-7146-M, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo alto, CA, 1990.
|
37 |
R. Villaverde, Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings, Eng. Struct. 28 (2006) 1209-1221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.016.
DOI
|
38 |
S.G. Cho, A. Gupta, Generation of floor response spectra considering coupling effect of primary and secondary system, J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea 24 (2020) 179-187.
DOI
|
39 |
Y.H. Ryu, W.Y. Jung, B. Ju, Vibration effects of nonclassically damped building-piping systems subjected to extreme loads, Shock Vib. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6189326.
DOI
|
40 |
A.K. Kazantzi, D. Vamvatsikos, E. Miranda, Evaluation of seismic acceleration demands on building nonstructural elements, J. Struct. Eng. (7) (2020) 146, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002676.
DOI
|