1 |
J.W. Reed, R.P. Kennedy, Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities, 1994. Final Report TR-103959, EPRI.
|
2 |
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants: LWR edition (NUREG-0800), Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.
|
3 |
ACI Committee 349, Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-13) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, 2013.
|
4 |
J.J. Bommer, P.J. Stafford, J.E. Alarcon, Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99 (6) (2009) 3217-3233.
DOI
|
5 |
O.W. Nuttli, State-of-the-art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States. Report 16, the Relation of Sustained Maximum Ground Acceleration and Velocity to Earthquake Intensity and Magnitude, 1979.
|
6 |
J.C. Foschaar, J.W. Baker, G.G. Deierlein, Preliminary assessment of ground motion duration effects on structural collapse. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2012.
|
7 |
L.E. Cover, M.P. Bohn, R.D. Campbell, D.A. Wesley, Handbook of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Fragilities, NUREG/CR-3558, Washington, DC, 1985. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
|
8 |
Y. Ogaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Takeda, T. Yamaguchi, S. Yoshizaki, S. Sugano, Shear strength tests of prestressed concrete containment vessels. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, 1981. J (a).
|
9 |
R.P. Kennedy, S.A. Short, K.L. Merz, F.J. Tokarz, I.M. Idriss, M.S. Power, K. Sadigh, Engineering characterization of ground motion, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Walnut Creek, CA (USA), 1984. Task I. Effects of characteristics of free-field motion on structural response, NUREG/CR-3805, Structural Mechanics Associates, Inc., Newport Beach, CA (USA).
|
10 |
Y.J. Park, A.H.S. Ang, Y.K. Wen, Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4) (1985) 740-757.
DOI
|
11 |
S.H. Eem, I.K. Choi, B.J. Yang, S.Y. Kwang, Methodology of seismic-response-correlation-coefficient calculation for seismic probabilistic safety assessment of multi-unit nuclear power plants, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 53 (3) (2021) 967-973.
DOI
|
12 |
Working Group on Quantification of Uncertainties, Uncertainty and Conservatism in the Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Facilities, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, USA, 1986.
|
13 |
EPRI, Seismic Fragility Application Guide. EPRI 1002988, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2002.
|
14 |
EPRI, Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2, vol. 1, 2012. Seismic (No. 1025287).
|
15 |
EPRI, High Frequency Program: Application Guidance for Functional Confirmation and Fragility Evaluation, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2015. EPRI 3002004396.
|
16 |
T. Zhou, M. Modarres, E.L. Droguett, An improved multi-unit nuclear plant seismic probabilistic risk assessment approach, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 171 (2018) 34-47.
DOI
|
17 |
W. Du, S. Long, C.L. Ning, An algorithm for selecting spatially correlated ground motions at multiple sites under scenario earthquakes, J. Earthq. Eng. (2019) 1-26.
|
18 |
E. Zengin, N.A. Abrahamson, S. Kunnath, Isolating the effect of ground-motion duration on structural damage and collapse of steel frame buildings, Earthq. Spectra 36 (2) (2020) 718-740.
DOI
|
19 |
T.K. Mandal, S. Ghosh, N.N. Pujari, Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: comparison of fragility models, Struct. Saf. 58 (2016) 11-19.
DOI
|
20 |
U.S. AEC, Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants Revision 1, Regulatory Guide 1.60, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, 1973.
|
21 |
R.P. Kennedy, C.A. Cornell, R.D. Campbell, S. Kaplan, H.F. Perla, Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des. 59 (2) (1980) 315-338.
DOI
|
22 |
U.S. NRC, A guide to the performance of probabilistic risk assessments for nuclear power plants, 1983. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC NUREG/CR-2300.
|
23 |
S.K. Sarma, K.S. Yang, An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 15 (1) (1987) 119-132.
DOI
|
24 |
K. Kostinakis, I.K. Fontara, A.M. Athanatopoulou, Scalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for assessing the seismic performance of structures: a review, J. Earthq. Eng. 22 (4) (2018) 630-665.
DOI
|
25 |
ASCE, Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2005.
|
26 |
J. Fayaz, M. Medalla, F. Zareian, Sensitivity of the response of Box-Girder Seat-type bridges to the duration of ground motions arising from crustal and subduction earthquakes, Eng. Struct. 219 (2020) 110845.
DOI
|
27 |
S.L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education India, 1996.
|
28 |
G.W. Housner, Measures of severity of earthquake ground shaking, Proc. U. S. Natl. Conf. Earthq. Eng. 6 (1975).
|
29 |
J.W. Reed, R.P. Kassawara, A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake, Nucl. Eng. Des. 123 (2-3) (1990) 387-396.
DOI
|
30 |
G.W. Housner, Spectrum Intensities of Strong-Motion Earthquakes, 1952.
|
31 |
O.W. Nuttli, The Relation of Sustained Maximum Ground Acceleration and Velocity to Earthquake Intensity and Magnitude, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1979.
|
32 |
J.B. Park, N.C. Park, S.J. Lee, Y.P. Park, Y.G. Choi, Seismic analysis of the APR1400 nuclear reactor system using a verified beam element model, Nucl. Eng. Des. 313 (2017) 108-117.
DOI
|
33 |
P.Y. Yawson, D. Lombardi, Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of nuclear reactor in a hypothetical UK site, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 113 (2018) 278-285.
DOI
|
34 |
M.D. Trifunac, A.G. Brady, A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65 (3) (1975) 581-626.
|
35 |
L. Al Atik, N. Abrahamson, An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching, Earthq. Spectra 26 (3) (2010) 601-617.
DOI
|
36 |
T. Uchida, N. Ohmori, T. Takahashi, S. Watanabe, H. Abe, Y. Aoyagi, Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Containment Models under the Combined Action of Internal Pressure and Lateral Force, 1979.
|
37 |
G. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Lu, P. Yan, W. Zhou, M. Chen, A general definition of integrated strong motion duration and its effect on seismic demands of concrete gravity dams, Eng. Struct. 125 (2016) 481-493.
DOI
|
38 |
M.K. Kim, J. Park, Y.S. Choun, I.K. Choi, Seismic fragility analysis for steel fiber applicability assessment for containment structure of nuclear power plant, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea 25 (5) (2012) 381-388.
DOI
|
39 |
Y.S. Choun, J. Park, Evaluation of seismic shear capacity of prestressed concrete containment vessels with fiber reinforcement, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 47 (6) (2015) 756-765.
DOI
|
40 |
A. Ali, N.A. Hayah, D. Kim, S.G. Cho, Probabilistic seismic assessment of base-isolated NPPs subjected to strong ground motions of Tohoku earthquake, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 46 (5) (2014) 699-706.
DOI
|
41 |
M. Raghunandan, A.B. Liel, Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse, Struct. Saf. 410 (2013) 119-133.
DOI
|
42 |
A. Ali, N. Abu-Hayah, D.K. Kim, S.G. Cho, Design response spectra-compliant real and synthetic GMS for seismic analysis of seismically isolated nuclear reactor containment building, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 49 (4) (2017) 825-837.
DOI
|
43 |
NECIS, (National Earthquake Comprehensive Information System), 2019. http://necis.kma.go.kr.
|
44 |
L. Lombardi, F. De Luca, J. Macdonald, Design of buildings through linear time-history analysis optimising ground motion selection: a case study for RCMRFs, Eng. Struct. 192 (2019) 279-295.
DOI
|
45 |
D.D. Nguyen, B. Thusa, T.S. Han, T.H. Lee, Identifying significant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 52 (1) (2020) 192-205.
DOI
|
46 |
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center), Strong Motion Database, 2020. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site.
|
47 |
N.H. Lee, K.B. Song, Seismic capability evaluation of the prestressed/reinforced concrete containment, 1999, pp. 189-203. Yonggwang nuclear power plant Units 5 and 6, Nuclear engineering and design, 192, 2-3.
|
48 |
I.K. Choi, S.M. Ahn, Y.S. Choun, Seismic fragility analysis of PSC containment building by nonlinear analysis, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea 10 (1) (2006) 63-74.
|
49 |
M. Kato, S. Tamura, Y. Watanabe, T. Takeda, T. Nakayama, Y. Omote, Dynamic and Static Loading Tests on 1/30 Scale Model of Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessel, 1981. Structural mechanics in reactor technology, Vol. K (b).
|
50 |
Y. Aoyagi, K. Yamada, An Experimental Approach to the Design of Network Reinforcement against In-Plane Shear in Reinforced Concrete Containments, 1979.
|
51 |
Y. Aoyagi, S. Ohmori, K. Yamada, Strength and deformational characteristics of orthogonally reinforced concrete containment models subjected to lateral forces. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, 1981. J (a).
|
52 |
N.M. Newmark, W.J. Hall, Development of Criteria for Seismic Review of Selected Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-0098, 1978.
|
53 |
A. Arias, Measure of Earthquake Intensity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1970.
|
54 |
U.S. NEI, Methodology for Performing Aircraft Impact Assessments for New Plant Designs, 2011. NEI 07-13 Revision 8P.
|
55 |
B. Xu, X. Wang, R. Pang, Y. Zhou, Influence of strong motion duration on the seismic performance of high CFRDs based on elastoplastic analysis, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 114 (2018) 438-447.
DOI
|
56 |
J.H. Song, J.H. Baik, S.K. Zee, S.Y. Park, S. Choi, B.D. Chung, W.P. Baek, Development of a high power three-loop nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (10) (2010) 3621-3631.
DOI
|
57 |
I.K. Choi, Y.S. Choun, S.M. Ahn, J.M. Seo, Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure for near-fault earthquakes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (6) (2008) 1382-1391.
DOI
|
58 |
R.P. Kennedy, M. Shinozuka, Recommended minimum power spectral density functions compatible with NRC regulatory guide 1.60 response spectrum 34 (1989). Recommendations for Resolution of Public Comments on USI A-40, Seismic Design Criteria.
|
59 |
D.A. Wesley, P.S. Hashimoto, Seismic Structural Fragility Investigation for the Zion Nuclear Power Plant. Seismic Safety Margins Research Program (Phase 1), 1981. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
|
60 |
ASCE, Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014.
|
61 |
EPRI, Seismic Fragility Application Update Guide, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2009. EPRI 1019200.
|
62 |
C.S. Kumar, V. Hassija, K. Velusamy, V. Balasubramaniyan, Integrated risk assessment for multi-unit NPP sitesda comparison, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 53-62.
DOI
|
63 |
Z. Cai, W.C. Xie, M.D. Pandey, S.H. Ni, Determining seismic fragility of structures and components in nuclear power plants using multiple ground motion Parameters-Part I: Methodology, Nucl. Eng. Des. 335 (2018) 195-201.
DOI
|
64 |
Y.S. Choun, J. Park, I.K. Choi, Choun, Effects of mechanical property variability in lead rubber bearings on the response of seismic isolation system for different ground motions, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 46 (5) (2014) 605-618.
DOI
|