Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.06.026

Analysis of climate change mitigations by nuclear energy using nonlinear fuzzy set theory  

Tae Ho Woo (Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, The Cyber University of Korea)
Kyung Bae Jang (Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, The Cyber University of Korea)
Chang Hyun Baek (Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, The Cyber University of Korea)
Jong Du Choi (Department of Business Administration, The Cyber University of Korea)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.54, no.11, 2022 , pp. 4095-4101 More about this Journal
Abstract
Following the climate-related disasters considered by several efforts, the nuclear capacity needs to double by 2050 compared to 2015. So, it is reasonable to investigate global warming incorporated with the fuzzy set theory for nuclear energy consumption in the aspect of fuzziness and nonlinearity of temperature variations. The complex modeling is proposed for the enhanced assessment of climate change where simulations indicate the degree of influence with the Boolean values between 0.0 and 1.0 in the designed variables. In the case of OIL, there are many 1.0 values between 20th and 60th months in the simulations where there are 10 times more for a 1.0 value in influence. Hence, the temperature variable can give the effective time using this study for 100 months. In the analysis, the 1.0 value in NUCLEAR means the highest influence of the modeling as the temperature increases resulting in global warming. In detail, the first influence happens near the 8th month and then there are four times more influences than effects in the early part of the temperature mitigation. Eventually, in the GLOBAL WARMING, the highest peak is around the 20th month, and then it is stabilized.
Keywords
Global warming; Energy; Nuclear; Temperature; Climate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 S. Nawaz, Energy poverty, climate shocks, and health deprivations, Ener. Econo. 100 (2021), 105338. 
2 D. Newbery, National Energy and Climate Plans for the island of Ireland: wind curtailment, interconnectors and storage, Ener. Pol. 158 (2021), 112513. 
3 L. Pajek, M. Koꠑsir, Strategy for achieving long-term energy efficiency of European single-family buildings through passive climate adaptation, Appl. Ener. 297 (2021), 117116. 
4 T.M. Skjolsvold, L. Coenen, Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration, Renew, Sust. Ener. Rev. 79 (2021), 102164. 
5 A. Suman, Role of renewable energy technologies in climate change adaptation and mitigation: a brief review from Nepal, Renew, Sust. Ener. Rev. 151 (2021), 111524. 
6 M.P. Tootkaboni, I. Ballarini, V. Corrado, Analysing the future energy performance of residential buildings in the most populated Italian climatic zone: a study of climate change impacts, Ener. Rep. 7 (2021) 8548-8560. 
7 Y. Yang, K. Javanroodi, V.M. Nik, Climate change and energy performance of European residential building stocks - a comprehensive impact assessment using climate big data from the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment, Appl. Ener. 298 (2021), 117246. 
8 P. Moriarty, D. Honnery, The risk of catastrophic climate change: future energy implications, Futures 128 (2021), 102728. 
9 L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, info, . Cont. 8 (3) (1965) 338-353.    DOI
10 O. Alpar, Monitoring and fuzzy warning system for risk prevention of Guyon's canal syndrome, Bio. Sig. Proc. Cont. 64 (2021), 102228. 
11 D. Behera, S. Chakraverty, Fuzzy finite element analysis of imprecisely defined structures with fuzzy nodal force, Engin. Appl. Arti. Intel. 26 (10) (2013) 2458-2466.    DOI
12 S. Ngerntong, S. Butdee, Surface roughness prediction with chip morphology using fuzzy logic on milling machine, Mat. Today Proc. 26 (2) (2020) 2357-2362.    DOI
13 H.A. Phama, V.H. Truong, M.T. Tran, Fuzzy static finite element analysis for functionally graded structures with semi-rigid connections, Struct 26 (2020) 639-650.    DOI
14 H.B. Yadav, D.K. Yadav, Construction of membership function for software metrics, Proc. Comp. Sci. 46 (2015) 933-940.    DOI
15 M. Mizumoto, K. Tanaka, Fuzzy sets and their operations, Info. Cont. 48 (1981) 30-48.    DOI
16 S.U. Ugbaje, I.O.A. Odeh, T.F.A. Bishop, Fuzzy measure-based multicriteria land assessment for rainfed maize in West Africa for the current and a range of plausible future climates, Comp. Elect. Agri. 158 (2019) 51-67.    DOI
17 J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted by Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA, 1961. 
18 SDS, Introduction to system dynamics, albany, USA. https://www.systemdynamics.org/what-is-sd, 2017. 
19 The Editorial Board, A Big Boost for the Climate Summit, The New York Times Company, NY, New York, 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/opinion/sunday/a-big-boost-for-the-climate-summit.html. 
20 M. Baer, E. Campiglio, J. Deyris, It takes two to dance: institutional dynamics and climate-related financial policies, Eco. Econ. 190 (2021), 107210. 
21 W. Jager, Using agent-based modelling to explore behavioural dynamics affecting our climate, Curr. Opin. Psycho. 42 (2021) 133-139.    DOI
22 T.H. Woo, Modeling for Climate Change in the Aspect of Nuclear Energy Priority: Nuclear Power Energy-Based Convergence Social-Humanity Analysis, Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, 7-8 May, 2015. 
23 T.H. Woo, Complex analysis for the climate change impact on the nuclear industry incorporated with the green energy, Int. J. Glob. Warm. 15 (1) (2018) 98-108.    DOI
24 T.H. Woo, Climate change modelling for nuclear industry in the aspect of energy consumption using system dynamics method, Int. J. Glob. Warm. 16 (2) (2018) 136-147.    DOI
25 T.H. Woo, H.S. Cho, Nonlinear modelling for greenhouse effect related to global warming incorporated with the nuclear industry using neural networking theory, Int. J. Glo.b Warm. 16 (3) (2018) 337-346.    DOI
26 UN, Take climate action to 'next Level', tackle challenges together, secretary-general tells world leaders at high-level event on implementing new development agendas, United Nations (UN), New York, USA, 2016. http://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sgsm17698.doc.htm. 
27 UN, Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Document FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris, 2015. 
28 IEA, OECDNEA Technology Roadmap, Nuclear Energy, International Energy Agency (IEA), OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (OECDNEA), OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015. 
29 T. Kurz, A.M.B. Prosser, Understanding the social dynamics of climate change through analyses of discourse, Curr. Opin. Psycho. 42 (2021) 71-75.    DOI
30 A. Jurgilevich, A. Ras€ anen, S. Juhola, Assessing the dynamics of urban € vulnerability to climate change: case of Helsinki, Finland, Env. Sci. Pol. 125 (2021) 32-43.    DOI
31 H. Wachtmeister, M. Ho€ok, Investment and production dynamics of conventional oil and unconventional tight oil: implications for oil markets and climate strategies, Ener. Clim. Cha. 1 (2020), 100010. 
32 P. Zhou, G. Wang, R. Duan, Impacts of long-term climate change on the groundwater flow dynamics in a regional groundwater system: case modeling study in Alashan, China J. Hydro. 590 (2020), 125557. 
33 M. Briere, K. Gajewski, Human population dynamics in relation to Holocene climate variability in the North American Arctic and Subarctic, Quat. Sci. Rev. 240 (2020), 106370. 
34 Ventana, Vensim Code System. PLE for Windows Version 7.2 Single Precision (X32), Ventana Systems, Inc., Harvard, USA, 2015.
35 S.H. Mousavi-Avval, S. Rafiee, M. Sharifi, S. Hosseinpour, A. Shah, Combined application of life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for modeling energy and environmental emissions of oilseed production, Renew. Sust. Ener. Rev. 78 (2017) 807-820.    DOI
36 IAEA, Energy, Electricity and nuclear power estimates for the period up to 2050, in: Reference Data Series No. 1, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, 2016, 2016. 
37 K.B. Aviso, D. Amalin, M.A.B. Promentilla, J.R. Santos, K.D.S. Yu, R.R. Tan, Risk assessment of the economic impacts of climate change on the implementation of mandatory biodiesel blending programs: a fuzzy inoperability input-output modeling (IIM) approach, Biom. Bioener. 83 (2015) 436-447.    DOI
38 T. Chen, Analyzing and forecasting the global CO2 concentration - a collaborative fuzzy-neural agent network approach, J. Appl. Res. Tech. 13 (2017) 364-373.    DOI
39 S. Ahn, V.S. Neary, Non-stationary historical trends in wave energy climate for coastal waters of the United States, Ocean Engin 216 (2020), 108044. 
40 X. Chen, Q. Fu, C.P. Chang, What are the shocks of climate change on clean energy investment: a diversified exploration, Ener. Econ. 95 (2021), 105136. 
41 M. Kinnunen, Weak congruence between public opinion and policy outcome in energy and climate policy - is there something wrong with Finnish democracy? Ener. Res. Soc. Sci. 79 (2021), 102014. 
42 A. Lucas, Investigating networks of corporate influence on government decision-making: the case of Australia's climate change and energy policies, Renew. Sust. Ener. Rev. 81 (2021), 102271. 
43 J. Marquardt, L.L. Delina, Making time, making politics: problematizing temporality in energy and climate studies, Renew. Sust. Ener. Rev. 76 (2021), 102073.