Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.03.033

A feasibility study of using a 3D-printed tumor model scintillator to verify the energy absorbed to a tumor  

Kim, Tae Hoon (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering)
Lee, Sangmin (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering)
Kim, Dong Geon (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering)
Jeong, Jae Young (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering)
Yang, Hye Jeong (Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University College of Medicine)
Schaarschmidt, Thomas (Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University College of Medicine)
Choi, Sang Hyoun (Research Team of Radiological Physics and Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science)
Cho, Gyu-Seok (Research Team of Radiological Physics and Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science)
Kim, Yong Kyun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering)
Chung, Hyun-Tai (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.9, 2021 , pp. 3018-3025 More about this Journal
Abstract
The authors developed a volumetric dosimetry detector system using in-house 3D-printable plastic scintillator resins. Three tumor model scintillators (TMSs) were developed using magnetic resonance images of a tumor. The detector system consisted of a TMS, an optical fiber, a photomultiplier tube, and an electrometer. The background signal, including the Cherenkov lights generated in the optical fiber, was subtracted from the output signal. The system showed 2.1% instability when the TMS was reassembled. The system efficiencies in collecting lights for a given absorbed energy were determined by calibration at a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory (kSSDL) or by calibration using Monte Carlo simulations (ksim). The TMSs were irradiated in a Gamma Knife® IconTM (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) following a treatment plan. The energies absorbed to the TMSs were measured and compared with a calculated value. While the measured energy determined with kSSDL was (5.84 ± 3.56) % lower than the calculated value, the energy with ksim was (2.00 ± 0.76) % higher. Although the TMS detector system worked reasonably well in measuring the absorbed energy to a tumor, further improvements in the calibration procedure and system stability are needed for the system to be accepted as a quality assurance tool.
Keywords
3D-printed tumor model; Plastic scintillator; Absorbed energy; Volumetric dosimetry; Treatment planning system; Monte Carlo simulation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 L. Archambault, A.S. Beddar, L. Gingras, R. Roy, L. Beaulieu, Measurement accuracy and Cerenkov removal for high performance, high spatial resolution scintillation dosimetry, Med. Phys. 33 (1) (2006) 128-135.   DOI
2 G.F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, John Wiley & Sons2010.
3 J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P.A. Dubois, M. Asai, G. Barrand, R. Capra, S. Chauvie, R. Chytracek, Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (1) (2006) 270-278.   DOI
4 A. Beddar, T. Mackie, F. Attix, Cerenkov light generated in optical fibres and other light pipes irradiated by electron beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 37 (4) (1992) 925.   DOI
5 L. Wootton, R. Kudchadker, A. Lee, S. Beddar, Real-time in vivo rectal wall dosimetry using plastic scintillation detectors for patients with prostate cancer, Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (3) (2014) 647.   DOI
6 J. Jelley, Cerenkov radiation and its applications, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 6 (7) (1955) 227.   DOI
7 P. Andreo, D.T. Burns, K. Hohlfeld, M.S. Huq, T. Kanai, F. Laitano, V. Smyth, S. Vynckier, Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: an International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Iaea Trs, 2000, p. 398.
8 T. Schaarschmidt, T.H. Kim, Y.K. Kim, H.J. Yang, H.-T. Chung, GEANT4-based Monte Carlo simulation of beam quality correction factors for the Leksell gamma Knife® PerfexionTM, J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 73 (12) (2018) 1814-1820.   DOI
9 S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K.a. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, M. Asai, D. Axen, S. Banerjee, G. Barrand, GEANT4-a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 506 (3) (2003) 250-303.   DOI
10 E.J. Hall, A.J. Giaccia, Radiobiology for the Radiologist, Philadelphia, 2006.
11 C.M. Poole, I. Cornelius, J.V. Trapp, C.M. Langton, A cad interface for geant4, Australas, Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 35 (3) (2012) 329-334.   DOI
12 S. Beddar, L. Archambault, N. Sahoo, F. Poenisch, G.T. Chen, M.T. Gillin, R. Mohan, Exploration of the potential of liquid scintillators for real-time 3D dosimetry of intensity modulated proton beams, Med. Phys. 36 (5) (2009) 1736-1743.   DOI
13 S. Vatnisky, A. Meghzifene, K. Christaki, H. Palmans, P. Andrew, M. Saiful Huq, Dosimetry of Small Fields Used in External Beam Radiotherapy: an International Code of Practice for Reference and Relative Dose Determination, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2017. IAEA TRS-483.
14 S.-G. Crystals, BC-400, BC-404, BC-408, BC-412, BC-416 Premium Plastic Scintillators, Saint-Gobain Crystals, Nemours, 2005.
15 H.-T. Chung, D.G. Kim, Modern radiosurgery equipment for treating brain metastases, Current and Future Management of Brain Metastasis 25 (2012) 236-247.   DOI
16 N. Agazaryan, T.D. Solberg, J.J. DeMarco, Patient specific quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 4 (1) (2003) 40-50.   DOI
17 J. Novotny Jr., P. Dvorak, V. Spevacek, J. Tintera, J. Novotny, T. Cechak, R. Liscak, Quality control of the stereotactic radiosurgery procedure with the polymergel dosimetry, Radiother. Oncol. 63 (2) (2002) 223-230.   DOI
18 J. Son, D.G. Kim, S. Lee, J. Park, Y. Kim, T. Schaarschmidt, Y.K. Kim, Improved 3D printing plastic scintillator fabrication, J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 73 (7) (2018) 887-892.   DOI
19 J. Malicki, The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification, Rep. Practical Oncol. Radiother. 17 (2) (2012) 63.   DOI
20 T.H. Kim, T. Schaarschmidt, H.J. Yang, Y.K. Kim, K.J. Chun, Y. Choi, H.-T. Chung, Development of an IAEA phase-space dataset for the Leksell gamma Knife® PerfexionTM using multi-threaded Geant4 simulations, Phys. Med. 64 (2019) 222-229.   DOI