Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.022

Effects of 3D contraction on pebble flow uniformity and stagnation in pebble beds  

Wu, Mengqi (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University)
Gui, Nan (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University)
Yang, Xingtuan (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University)
Tu, Jiyuan (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University)
Jiang, Shengyao (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.5, 2021 , pp. 1416-1428 More about this Journal
Abstract
Pebble flow characteristics can be significantly affected by the configuration of pebble bed, especially for HTGR pebble beds. How to achieve a desired uniform flow pattern without stagnation is the top priority for reactor design. Pebbles flows inside some specially designed pebble bed with arc-shaped contraction configurations at the bottom, including both concave-inward and convex-outward shapes are explored based on discrete element method. Flow characteristics including pebble retention, residence-time frequency density, flow uniformity as well as axial velocity are investigated. The results show that the traditionally designed pebble bed with cone-shape bottom is not the most preferred structure with respect to flow pattern for reactor design. By improving the contraction configuration, the flow performance can be significantly enhanced. The flow in the convex-shape configuration featured by uniformity, consistency and less stagnation, is much more desirable for pebble bed design. In contrast, when the shape is from convex-forward to concave-inward, the flow shows more nonuniformity and stagnation in the corner although the average cross-section axial velocity is the largest due to the dominant middle pebbles.
Keywords
Pebble flow; Pebble bed configuration; Particle flow uniformity; Reactor design; Discrete element method; HTGR;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 S.D. Liu, Z.Y. Zhou, R.P. Zou, D. Pinson, A.B. Yu, Flow characteristics and discharge rate of ellipsoidal particles in a flat bottom hopper, Powder Technol 253 (2014) 70-79.   DOI
2 Toit Du, G. Charl, Analysing the porous structure of packed beds of spheres using a semi-analytical approach, Powder Technol 342 (2019) 475-485.   DOI
3 J. M Ryskamp, E.A. Harvego, S.T. Khericha, E.J. Gorski, D.J. Harrell, New generation nuclear plant: high level functions and requirements, in: International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 2004.
4 N. Gui, X. Yang, J. Tu, S. Jiang, Effect of bed configuration on pebble flow uniformity and stagnation in the pebble bed reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des 270 (2014) 295-301.   DOI
5 R. Swart, R.T. Dobson, Thermal-hydraulic simulation and evaluation of a natural circulation thermosyphon loop for a reactor cavity cooling system of a high- temperature reactor, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (2020) 271-278.   DOI
6 S.A. Alameri, J.C. Kingm, A.K. Alkaabi, Y. Addad, Prismatic-core advanced high temperature reactor and thermal energy storage coupled system - a preliminary design, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (2020) 248-257.   DOI
7 S.Y. Jiang, J.Y. Tu, X.T. Yang, N. Gui, A review of pebble flow study for pebble bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor, Exp Computat. Multiphase Flow 1 (3) (2019) 159-176.
8 M.A. Alzamly, M. Aziz, A.A. Badawi, H.A. Gabal, A.R.A. Gadallah, Burnup analysis for HTR-10 reactor core loaded with uranium and thorium oxide, Nucl. Eng. Technol 52 (2020) 674-680.   DOI
9 X.M. Sun, Y.J. Dong, P.F. Hao, L. Shi, F. Li, Y.T. Feng, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of quasi-static pebble flow, Adv. Powder Technol. 28 (2017) 499-505.   DOI
10 G.J. Auwerda, J.L. Kloosterman, D. Lathouwers, T.H.J.J. van der Hagen, Effects of random pebble distribution on the multiplication factor in HTR pebble bed reactors, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 1056-1066.   DOI
11 X.L. Zhang, Z.F. Li, A new method for calculating curve equation of silo, China Powder Sci. Technol. 19 (2013) 84-86.
12 S. Albaraki, S.J. Antony, How does internal angle of hoppers affect granular flow? Experimental studies using digital particle image velocimetry, Powder Technol 268 (2014) 253-260.   DOI
13 K.O. Lee, R.P. Gardner, Prediction of pebble motion in pebble-bed reactors using Monte Carlo molecular dynamics simulation, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 174 (3) (2013) 264-285.   DOI
14 X. Jia, N. Gui, X. Yang, J. Tu, H. Jia, S. Jiang, Experimental study of flow field characteristics on bed configurations in the pebble bed reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 102 (2017) 1-10.   DOI
15 X.T. Yang, W.P. Hu, S.Y. Jiang, K.K.L. Wong, J.Y. Tu, Mechanism analysis of quasi-static dense pebble flow in pebble bed reactor using phenomenological approach, Nucl. Eng. Des. 250 (2012) 247-259.   DOI
16 M. Wu, N. Gui, H. Wu, X. Yang, J. Tu, S. Jiang, Effects of density difference and loading ratio on pebble flow in a three-dimensional two-region-designed pebble bed, Ann. Nucl. Energy 133 (2019) 924-936.   DOI
17 R. Berger, C. Kloss, A. Kohlmeyer, Hybrid parallelization of the LIGGGHTS open-source DEM code, Powder Technol 278 (2015) 234-247.   DOI
18 Y. Li, N. Gui, X. Yang, J. Tu, S. Jiang, Effect of wall structure on pebble stagnation behavior in pebble bed reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 80 (2015) 195-202.   DOI
19 R. Balevicius, R. Kacianauskas, Z. Mroz, I. Sielamowicz, Analysis and DEM simulation of granular material flow patterns in hopper models of different shapes, Adv. Powder Technol. 22 (2011) 226-235.   DOI
20 H. Suikkanen, V. Rintala, J. Hyvarinen, DEM in analyses of nuclear pebble bed reactors. International Conference on Discrete Element Methods, Springer Singapore, 2017.
21 P.A. Cundall, The Measurement and Analysis of Acceleration in Rock Slopes, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of London, imperial college of science and technology, 1971.
22 F. Vivanco, S. Rica, F. Melo, Dynamical arching in a two-dimensional granular flow, Granul. Matter 14 (5) (2012) 563-576.   DOI
23 International Atomic Energy Agency, Current Status and Future Development of Modular High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Technology, IAEA-TEDOC-1198, Vienna, February 2001.
24 F. Al Falahi, G. Mueller, M. Al Dahhan, Pebble bed nuclear reactor structure study: a comparison of the experimental and calculated void fraction distribution, Prog. Nucl. Energy 106 (2018) 153-161.   DOI
25 T.S. Majmudar, M. Sperl, S. Luding, R.P. Behringer, Jamming transition in granular systems, Phys. Rev. Lett 98 (5) (2007), 058001.   DOI
26 S.H. Kim, H.C. Kim, J.K. Kim, J.M. Noh, A study on evaluation of pebble flow velocity with modification of the kinematic model for pebble bed reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 55 (2013) 322-330.   DOI
27 W. Zhang, K. Thompson, A. Reed, L. Beenken, Relationship between packing structure and porosity in fixed beds of equilateral cylindrical particles, Chem. Eng. Sci 61 (2006) 8060-8074.   DOI
28 T.V. Nguyen, C.E. Brennen, R.H. Sabersky, Funnel flow in hoppers, J. Appl. Mech. 47 (4) (1980) 729.   DOI
29 J. Horabik, M. Molenda, Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: a review, Biosyst. Eng. 147 (2016) 206-225.   DOI
30 R.B. Emery, Aeration apparatus converts bin from funnel-flow to mass-flow characteristics, J. Eng. Ind. 95 (1) (1973) 37.   DOI
31 G.E. Mueller, A simple method for determining sphere packed bed porosity, Powder Technol 229 (2012) 90-96.   DOI
32 Yi-qian Wang, Chaoqun Liu, Liutex (vorex) cores in transitional boundary layer with spanwise-wall oscillation, Journal of Hydrodynamics 31 (6) (2019) 1178-1189.   DOI
33 C.H. Rycroft, G.S. Grest, M.Z. Bazant, J. Landry, Analysis of granular flow in a pebble-bed nuclear reactor, Phys. Rev. E 74 (2006), 021306.   DOI
34 J. Choi, A. Kudrolli, R.R. Rosales, M.Z. Bazant, Diffusion and mixing in gravity-driven dense granular flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 174301.   DOI
35 H. Ahn, Z. Basaranoglu, M. Yilmaz, A. Bugutekin, M. Zafer Gul, Experimental investigation of granular flow through an orifice, Powder Technol 186 (1) (2008) 65-71.   DOI
36 J. Wan, F. Wang, G. Yang, S. Zhang, M. Wang, P. Lin, The influence of orifice shape on the flow rate: a DEM and experimental research in 3D hopper granular flows, Powder Technol 335 (2018) 147-155.   DOI
37 D. Choi, S. Park, J. Han, M.Y. Ahn, Y. Lee, Y.H. Park, S. Cho, D. Sohn, A DEM-CFD study of the effects of size distributions and packing fractions of pebbles on purge gas flow through pebble beds, Fusion Eng. Des. 143 (2019) 24-34.   DOI
38 S.Y. Jiang, X.T. Yang, Z.W. Tang, W.J. Wang, J.Y. Tu, Z.Y. Liu, J. Li, Experimental and numerical validation of a two-region-designed pebble bed reactor with dynamic core, Nucl. Eng. Des. 246 (2012) 277-285.   DOI
39 Wen-qian Xu, Yi-qian Wang, Chaoqun Liu, Liutex similarity in turbulent boundary layer, Journal of Hydrodynamics 31 (6) (2019) 1259-1262.   DOI