Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.09.011

Development of risk assessment framework and the case study for a spent fuel pool of a nuclear power plant  

Choi, Jintae (KEPCO E&C)
Seok, Ho (KEPCO E&C)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.4, 2021 , pp. 1127-1133 More about this Journal
Abstract
A Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) is designed to store spent fuel assemblies in the pool. And, a SFP cooling and cleanup system cools the SFP coolant through a heat exchanger which exchanges heat with component cooling water. If the cooling system fails or interfacing pipe (e.g., suction or discharge pipe) breaks, the cooling function may be lost, probably leading to fuel damage. In order to prevent such an incident, it is required to properly cool the spent fuel assemblies in the SFP by either recovering the cooling system or injecting water into the SFP. Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) is a good tool to assess the SFP risk when an initiating event for the SFP occurs. Since PSA has been focused on reactor-side so far, it is required to study on the framework of PSA approach for SFP and identify the key factors in terms of fuel damage frequency (FDF) through a case study. In this study, therefore, a case study of SFP-PSA on the basis of design information of APR-1400 has been conducted quantitatively, and several sensitivity analyses have been conducted to understand the impact of the key factors on FDF.
Keywords
Probabilistic safety assessment; Probabilistic risk assessment; Spent fuel pool;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 T.E. Collins, G. Hubbard, Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-1738, U.S. NRC, 2001, February.
2 J. Sursock, PWR Spent Fuel Pool Risk Assessment Integration Framework and Pilot Plant Application, Report 3002002691, Final Report, Electric Power Research Institute, USA, 2014, June.
3 J.G. Ibarra, Operating Experience Feedback Report-Assessment of Spent Fuel Cooling. NUREG-1275, 12, U.S. NRC, 1997, February.
4 U.S. NRC, Industry-average Performance for Components and Initiating Events at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-6928, Idaho National Laboratory, 2015.
5 S.A. Eide, C.D. Gentillon, T.E. Wierman, Reevaluation of Station Blackout Risk at Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-6890, U.S. NRC, 2005, December.
6 A.D. Swain, H.E. Guttman, Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/CR-1278, U.S. NRC, 1983, August.
7 U.S. NRC, CCF Parameter Estimations 2015 Update, 2015.
8 reportEPRI Report 3002004030 (2014, May). Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Calculator Version 5.1, Electric Power Research Institute.
9 G.W. Parry, June), an Approach to the Analysis of Operator Actions in Probabilistic Risk Assessment, TR-100259. EPRI, 1992.
10 ASME, Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, 2013.
11 E-P-NU-907-1.3, SAREX 1.3 Software Registration, KEPCO-E&C, 2016, February.