Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.08.024

Scaling analysis of the pressure suppression containment test facility for the small pressurized water reactor  

Liu, Xinxing (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University)
Qi, Xiangjie (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University)
Zhang, Nan (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University)
Meng, Zhaoming (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University)
Sun, Zhongning (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.3, 2021 , pp. 793-803 More about this Journal
Abstract
The small PWR has been paid more and more attention due to its diversity of application and flexibility in the site selection. However, the large core power density, the small containment space and the rapid accident progress characteristics make it difficult to control the containment pressure like the traditional PWR during the LOCA. The pressure suppression system has been used by the BWR since the early design, which is a suitable technique that can be applied to the small PWR. Since the configuration and operating conditions are different from the BWR, the pressure suppression system should be redesigned for the small PWR. Conducting the experiments on the scale down test facility is a good choice to reproduce the prototypical phenomena in the test facility, which is both economical and reasonable. A systematic scaling method referring to the H2TS method was proposed to determine the geometrical and thermohydraulic parameters of the pressure suppression containment response test facility for the small PWR conceptual design. The containment and the pressure suppression system related thermohydraulic phenomena were analyzed with top-down and bottom-up scaling methods. A set of the scaling criteria were obtained, through which the main parameters of the test facility can be determined.
Keywords
Scaling analysis; Small PWR; Top-down; Bottom-up; H2TS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 L.I. Sheng-Qiang, L.I. Wei-Hua, J. Sheng-Yao, Study on source term evaluation method in simulation and scaling for containment during LOCA, Nucl. Power Eng. 33 (3) (2012) 132-137.   DOI
2 Jose N. Reyes Jr., Hochreiter Lawrence, Scaling analysis for the OSU AP600 test facility (APEX), Nucl. Eng. Des. 186 (1-2) (1998) 53-109.   DOI
3 Studsvik, A.B. Energiteknik, Marviken Full-Scale Critical-Flow Tests. Volume 22. Results from Test 14. Final Report. No. EPRI-NP-2370-VOL. 22, Studsvik Energiteknik AB, 1982.
4 Jani Laine, Markku Puustinen, Antti Rasanen, PPOOLEX Experiments on the Dynamics of Free Water Surface in the Blowdown Pipe. No. NKS-281, Nordisk Kernesikkerhedsforskning, 2013.
5 Amir N. Nahavandi, Frank S. Castellana, Edick N. Moradkhanian, Scaling laws for modeling nuclear reactor systems, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 72 (1) (1979) 75-83.   DOI
6 W.L. Brown, Scaling of the AP600 containment large scale test facility, in: 7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 1999.
7 Shinya Mizokami, et al., Unsolved issues related to thermal-hydraulics in the suppression chamber during Fukushima Daiichi accident progressions, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (5) (2016) 630-638.   DOI
8 Tangtao Feng, et al., Numerical research on thermal mixing characteristics in a 45-degree T-junction for two-phase stratified flow during the emergency core cooling safety injection, Prog. Nucl. Energy 114 (2019) 91-104.   DOI
9 Robert E. Henry, Hans K. Fauske, The two-phase critical flow of onecomponent mixtures in nozzles, orifices, and short tubes, 1971, pp. 179-187.
10 Frank Kreith, Raj M. Manglik, Mark S. Bohn, Principles of Heat Transfer, Cengage learning, 2012.
11 G. Patel, V. Tanskanen, R. Kyrki-Rajamaki, Numerical modelling of low-Reynolds number direct contact condensation in a suppression pool test facility, Ann. Nucl. Energy 71 (2014) 376-387.   DOI
12 Biao Quan, et al., Research on suppressant characteristics of suppression containment, Nucl. Power Eng. 35 (2) (2014) 114-117.
13 H.G. Thoren, et al., Full-scale Containment Experiments Performed in the Marviken Power Plant. No. CONF-730304-, 1973.
14 Yutaka Kukita, et al., The noncondensable gas effects on loss-of-coolant accident steam condensation loads in boiling water reactor pressure suppression pool, Nucl. Technol. 63 (2) (1983) 337-346.   DOI
15 G. Patel, et al., Direct contact condensation modeling in pressure suppression pool system, Nucl. Eng. Des. 321 (2017) 328-342.   DOI
16 Robert E. Gamble, et al., Pressure suppression pool mixing in passive advanced BWR plants, Nucl. Eng. Des. 204 (1-3) (2001) 321-336.   DOI
17 G. Kocamustafaogullari, M. Ishii, Scaling of two-phase flow transients using reduced pressure system and simulant fluid, Nucl. Eng. Des. 104 (2) (1987) 121-132.   DOI
18 Novak Zuber, et al., An integrated structure and scaling methodology for severe accident technical issue resolution: development of methodology, Nucl. Eng. Des. 186 (1-2) (1998) 1-21.   DOI
19 Mingjun Wang, et al., Study on the coolant mixing phenomenon in a 45° T junction based on the thermal-mechanical coupling method, Appl. Therm. Eng. 144 (2018) 600-613.   DOI
20 Frederick J. Moody, Introduction to Unsteady Thermofluid Mechanics, WileyInterscience, New York, 1990, p. 667, 1990.
21 Pravin Sawant, Mohsen Khatib-Rahbar, Modeling pressure suppression pool hydrodynamics in the ABWR containment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (9) (2011) 3824-3838.   DOI
22 Richard T. Lahey, F.J. Moody, The Thermal-Hydraulics of a Boiling Water Nuclear Reactor, second ed., 1996.
23 P.F. Peterson, V.E. Schrock, R. Greif, Scaling for integral simulation of mixing in large, stratified volumes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 186 (1-2) (1998) 213-224.   DOI
24 W.M. Rohsenow, H. Choi, Heat, Mass, and Momentum Transfer, 1961.