Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.08.014

Copula-based common cause failure models with Bayesian inferences  

Jin, Kyungho (Kyung Hee University)
Son, Kibeom (Kyung Hee University)
Heo, Gyunyoung (Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.2, 2021 , pp. 357-367 More about this Journal
Abstract
In general, common cause failures (CCFs) have been modeled with the assumption that components within the same group are symmetric. This assumption reduces the number of parameters required for the CCF probability estimation and allows us to use a parametric model, such as the alpha factor model. Although there are various asymmetric conditions in nuclear power plants (NPPs) to be addressed, the traditional CCF models are limited to symmetric conditions. Therefore, this paper proposes the copulabased CCF model to deal with asymmetric as well as symmetric CCFs. Once a joint distribution between the components is constructed using copulas, the proposed model is able to provide the probability of common cause basic events (CCBEs) by formulating a system of equations without symmetry assumptions. In addition, Bayesian inferences for the parameters of the marginal and copula distributions are introduced and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are employed to sample from the posterior distribution. Three example cases using simulated data, including asymmetry conditions in total failure probabilities and/or dependencies, are illustrated. Consequently, the copula-based CCF model provides appropriate estimates of CCFs for asymmetric conditions. This paper also discusses the limitations and notes on the proposed method.
Keywords
Common cause failures; Asymmetric conditions; Copula; Bayesian inferences;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 A. Mosleh, D. Rasmuson, F. Marshall, Guidelines on modeling common-cause failures in probabilistic risk assessment, Idaho Natl. Eng. Environ. Lab. (1999).
2 D. Il Kang, M.J. Hwang, S.H. Han, J.E. Yang, Approximate formulas for treating asymmetrical common cause failure events, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (2009) 346-352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.10.004.   DOI
3 D.L. Kelly, D.M. Rasmuson, Common-cause failure analysis in event assessment, in: Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab., 2008, pp. 521-532, https://doi.org/10.1243/1748006XJRR121.   DOI
4 A. Shemyakin, A. Kniazev, Introduction to Bayesian Estimation and Copula Models of Dependence, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118959046.
5 C. Czado, Analyzing Dependent Data with Vine Copulas, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13785-4.
6 R.D.S. Silva, H.F. Lopes, Copula, marginal distributions and model selection: a Bayesian note, Stat. Comput. 18 (2008) 313-320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-008-9058-y.   DOI
7 E.F. Saraiva, A.K. Suzuki, L.A. Milan, Bayesian computational methods for sampling from the posterior distribution of a bivariate survival model, based on AMH copula in the presence of right-censored data, Entropy 20 (2018) 1-21, https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090642.   DOI
8 H.H. Kwon, A copula-based nonstationary frequency analysis for the 2012e2015 drought in California, Water Resour. Res. 52 (2016) 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015716.   DOI
9 U.S.NRC, Industry-average performance for components and initiating events at U.S. Commercial, Nuclear Power Plants (2007).
10 G.O. Roberts, A. Gelman, W.R. Gilks, Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms, Ann. Appl. Probab. 7 (1997) 110-120.   DOI
11 K. Jin, G. Heo, Copula study for common cause failures under asymmetric conditions, in: Trans. Korean Nucl. Soc. Spring Meet. Jeju, Korea, 2019. May 23-24.
12 J.-Y. Kim, J.-G. Kim, Y.-H. Cho, H.-H. Kwon, A development of Bayesian Copula model for a bivariate drought frequency analysis, J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 50 (2017) 745-758, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2017.50.11.745.   DOI
13 M.F. Pellissetti, U. Klapp, Integration of Correlation Models for Seismic Failures into Fault Tree Based Seismic Psa, 2011, pp. 6-11.
14 W.S. Jung, K. Hwang, S.K. Park, A new method to allocate combination probabilities of correlated seismic failures into CCF probabilities, in: PSA 2019 - Int. Top. Meet. Probabilistic Saf. Assess. Anal., 2019, pp. 369-373.
15 S. Geman, D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI- 6 (1984) 721-741, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596.   DOI
16 D. Huard, G. Evin, A.C. Favre, Bayesian copula selection, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51 (2006) 809-822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.08.010.   DOI
17 X. Jia, L. Wang, C. Wei, Reliability research of dependent failure systems using copula, Commun. Stat. Simulat. Comput. 43 (2014) 1838-1851, https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2013.800879.   DOI
18 IAEA, Procedures for Conducting Common Cause Failure Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment: IAEA TECDOC Series No, vol. 648, 1992.
19 R.B. Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28678-0.
20 A. O'Connor, A. Mosleh, A general cause based methodology for analysis of common cause and dependent failures in system risk and reliability assessments, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145 (2016) 341-350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.007.   DOI
21 W.K. Hastings, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57 (1970) 97-109, https://doi.org/10.2307/2334940.   DOI
22 D.L. Kelly, Using copulas to model dependence in simulation risk assessment, ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. Proc. 14 (2008) 81-89, https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2007-41284.   DOI