Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.07.002

Analysis of the flow distribution and mixing characteristics in the reactor pressure vessel  

Tong, L.L. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
Hou, L.Q. (Nuclear Power Institute of China)
Cao, X.W. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.53, no.1, 2021 , pp. 93-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
The analysis of the fluid flow characteristics in reactor pressure vessel is an important part of the hydraulic design of nuclear power plant, which is related to the structure design of reactor internals, the flow distribution at core inlet and the safety of nuclear power plant. The flow distribution and mixing characteristics in the pressurized reactor vessel for the 1000MWe advanced pressurized water reactor is analyzed by using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method in this study. The geometry model of the full-scaled reactor vessel is built, which includes the cold and hot legs, downcomer, lower plenum, core, upper plenum, top plenum, and is verified with some parameters in DCD. Under normal condition, it is found that the flow skirt, core plate holes and outlet pipe cause pressure loss. The maximum and minimum flow coefficient is 1.028 and 0.961 respectively, and the standard deviation is 0.019. Compared with other reactor type, it shows relatively uniform of the flow distribution at the core inlet. The coolant mixing coefficient is investigated with adding additional variables, showing that mass transfer of coolant occurs near the interface. The coolant mainly distributes in the 90° area of the corresponding core inlet, and mixes at the interface with the coolant from the adjacent cold leg. 0.1% of corresponding coolant is still distributed at the inlet of the outer-ring components, indicating wide range of mixing coefficient distribution.
Keywords
Flow distribution; Coolant mixing coefficient; Core inlet;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Westinghouse Electric Co LLC, Wastinghouse AP1000 Design Control Document, vol. 19, Revision, Butler County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A, 2011.
2 Hao L. L., Chen H., Qiu S. C., Sensitivity analysis of turbulence models for the core inlet flow distribution of PWR. Proceedings of the 2018 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, July 22-26, 2018, London, England.
3 R. Ulrich, H. Bengt, K. Soeren, et al., The European Project FLOMIX-R: Fluid Mixing and Flow Distribution in the Reactor Circuit, Final Summary Report. Report FZR, vol. 432, Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany, 2005.
4 S.K. Kang, Y.A. Hassan, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) round robin benchmark for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 301 (2016) 204-231.   DOI
5 R.J. Hertlein, K. Umminger, S. Kliem, et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of boron dilution transients in pressurized water reactors, Nucl. Technol. 141 (1) (2003) 88-107.   DOI
6 Kim Kihwan, Dong-Jin, In-Cheol Euh, Chu, et al., Experimental study of the APR+ reactor core flow and pressure distributions under 4-pump running conditions, Nucl. Eng. Des. 265 (2013) 957-966.   DOI
7 G. Pochet, M. Haedens, C.R. Schneidesch, et al., CFD simulations of the flow mixing in the lower plenum of PWR's, Nucl. Phys. 2 (2) (2012) 160-168.   DOI
8 M. Wang, L. Bai, L. Wang, et al., Thermal hydraulic and stress coupling analysis for AP1000 pressurized thermal shock (PTS) study under SBLOCA scenario, Appl. Therm. Eng. 122 (2017) 158-170.   DOI
9 M.T. Kao, C.Y. Wu, C.C. Chieng, et al., CFD analysis of PWR core top and reactor vessel upper plenum internal subdomain models, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (10) (2011) 4181-4193.   DOI
10 Y.M. Chao, Y.J. Zhai, L.X. Yang, et al., Thermal Hydraulics Characteristics Simulation of CPR1000 Using CFD Method, Proceeding of ICONE-21, Chengdu, China, 2013. ICONE21-16591.
11 T. Hohne, G. Grunwald, U. Rohde, Coolant mixing in pressurized water reactors, in: Proceeding of the 8th AER Symposium on VVER Reactor Physics and Safety, Bystrice and Pernctejnem, Czech Republic, 1998. FZR-237.
12 Y.B. Xu, C. Michael, K. Yuan, et al., Study of impact of the AP1000 reactor vessel upper internals design on fuel performance, Nucl. Eng. Des. 252 (2012) 128-134.   DOI
13 T. Hohne, S. Kliem, U. Bieder, Modeling of a buoyancy-driven flow experiment at the ROCOM test facility using the CFD codes CFX-5 and TRIO U, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (12) (2006) 1309-1325.   DOI
14 T.V. Dury, B. Hemstrom, S.V. Shepel, CFD simulation of the Vattenfall 1/5th-scale PWR model for boron dilution studies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (3) (2008) 577-589.   DOI
15 S. Bhattacharjee, G. Ricciardi, S. Viazzo, Comparative study of the contribution of various PWR spacer grid components to hydrodynamic and wall pressure characteristics, Nucl. Eng. Des. 317 (2017) 22-43.   DOI
16 ANSYS CFX Help, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Release 18.2, ANSYS Inc. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier BV All rights reserved.
17 G. Prasser, T. Grunwald, S. Hohne, et al., Coolant mixing in a pressurized water reactor: deboration transients, steam-line breaks, and emergency core cooling injection, Nucl. Technol. 143 (1) (2003) 37-56.   DOI