Application of sigmoidal optimization to reconstruct nuclear medicine image: Comparison with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction method |
Shin, Han-Back
(Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University, College of Medicine)
Kim, Moo-Sub (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Research Institute of Biomedical, Engineering, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea) Law, Martin (Proton Therapy Pte Ltd) Djeng, Shih-Kien (Proton Therapy Pte Ltd) Choi, Min-Geon (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Research Institute of Biomedical, Engineering, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea) Choi, Byung Wook (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) Kang, Sungmin (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) Kim, Dong-Wook (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University, College of Medicine) Suh, Tae Suk (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Research Institute of Biomedical, Engineering, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea) Yoon, Do-Kun (Department of Biomedical Engineering and Research Institute of Biomedical, Engineering, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea) |
1 | E. Garcia, SPECT attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology's manifest destiny, J. Nucl. Cardiol. 14 (2007) 16-24. DOI |
2 | A. Fogliata, R. Garcia, T. Knoos, et al., Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy, Med. Phys. 39 (2012) 6455-6464. DOI |
3 | D. Silver, J. Schrittwieser, K. Simonyan, et al., Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge, Nature 550 (2017) 354. DOI |
4 | H. Liu, M. Guo, Z. Hu, P. Shi, H. Hu, Nonlinear dual reconstruction of SPECT activity and attenuation images, PloS One 9 (2014), e106951. DOI |
5 | J. Cui, X. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Liu, Deep reconstruction model for dynamic PET images, PloS One 12 (2017), e0184667. DOI |
6 | H. Shin, H. Sheen, H. Lee, et al., Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) information conversion procedure for SUV calculation of PET scanners with different DICOM header information, Phys. Med. 44 (2017) 243-248. DOI |
7 | S. Lebron, B. Lu, G. Yan, et al., Parameterization of photon beam dosimetry for a linear accelerator, Med. Phys. 43 (2016) 748-760. |
8 | Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521 (2015) 436-444. DOI |
9 | I. Haggstrom, C. Schmidtlein, G.Campanella T. Fuchs, DeepPET: a deep encoder-decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem, Med. Image Anal. 54 (2019) 253-262. DOI |
10 | T. Moon, The expectation-maximization algorithm, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13 (1996) 47-60. DOI |
11 | Y. Vardi, L. Shepp, L. Kaufman, A statistical model for positron emission tomography, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80 (1985) 8-20. DOI |
12 | K. Hong, Y. Choi, J. Jung, et al., A prototype MR insertable brain PET using tileable GAPD arrays, Med. Phys. 40 (2013), 042503. DOI |
13 | H. Shin, M. Kim, S. Kim, et al., Quantitative analysis of prompt gamma ray imaging during proton boron fusion therapy according to boron concentration, Oncotarget 9 (2018) 3089. DOI |
14 | H. Shin, D. Yoon, J. Jung, M. Kim, T. Suh, Prompt gamma ray imaging for verification of proton boron fusion therapy: a Monte Carlo study, Phys. Med. 32 (2016) 1271-1275. DOI |
15 | S. Tong, A. Alessio, P. Kinahan, Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation, Phys. Med. Biol. 55 (2010) 1453. DOI |
16 | L. Qin, H. Li, S. Lu, D. Ding, G. Ren, Growth and characteristics of LYSO (Lu2(1_x_y)Y2xSiO5: cey) scintillation crystals, J. Cryst. Growth 281 (2) (2005) 518-524. DOI |
17 | P. Slomka, T. Pan, D. Berman, G. Germano, Advances in SPECT and PET hardware, Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 57 (2015) 566-578. DOI |
18 | K. Lange, M. Bahn, R. Little, A theoretical study of some maximum likelihood algorithms for emission and transmission tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 6 (1987) 106-114. DOI |
19 | J. Nuyts, S. Stroobants, P. Dupont, et al., Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images, J. Nucl. Med. 43 (2002) 1054-1062. |
20 | M. Law, C. Tang, Capability of 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm in performing half-time myocardial perfusion imaging studies, in: Radiological Society of North America, USA, Nov 30 - Dec 5, 2014. |
21 | D. Yang, D. Xing, H. Gu, Y. Tan, L. Zeng, Fast multielement phase-controlled photoacoustic imaging based on limited-field-filtered back-projection algorithm, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 194101. DOI |
22 | X. Yu, S. Chen, Z. Hu, et al., Sparse/low rank constrained reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging, PloS One 10 (2015), e0142019. DOI |
23 | S. Cherry, J. Sorenson, M. Phelps, Physics in Nuclear Medicine, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012. |
24 | L. Hongbo, W. Kun, T. Jie, Postreconstruction filtering of 3D PET images by using weighted higher order singular value decomposition, Biomed. Eng. Online 15 (2016) 102. DOI |
25 | P. Bruyant, Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT, J. Nucl. Med. 43 (2002) 1343-1358. |
26 | O. Grosser, D. Kupitz, J. Ruf, et al., Optimization of SPECT-CT hybrid imaging using iterative image reconstruction for low-dose CT: a phantom study, PloS One 10 (2015), e0138658. DOI |
27 | H. Hudson, R. Larkin, Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 13 (1994) 601-609. DOI |
28 | N. Freedman, D. Schechter, M. Klein, et al., SPECT attenuation artifacts in normal and overweight persons: insights from a retrospective comparison of Rb-82 positron emission tomography and Tl-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, Clin. Nucl. Med. 25 (2000) 1019-1023. DOI |
29 | C. Floyd, R. Jaszczak, R. Coleman, Inverse Monte Carlo: a unified reconstruction algorithm for SPECT, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 32 (1985) 779-785. DOI |
30 | T. Yokei, H. Shinohara, H. Onishi, Performance evaluation of OSEM reconstruction algorithm incorporating three-dimensional distance-dependent resolution compensation for brain SPECT: a simulation study, Ann. Nucl. Med. 16 (2002) 11-18. DOI |
31 | J. Ollinger, Maximum-likelihood reconstruction of transmission images in emission computed tomography via the EM algorithm, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 13 (1994) 89-101. DOI |
32 | F. Beekman, H. De-Jong, S. Van-Geloven, Efficient fully 3-D iterative SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 21 (2002) 867-877. DOI |
33 | A. Gaitanis, G. Kontaxakis, G. Spyrou, et al., Studying the properties of the updating coefficients in the OSEM algorithm for iterative image reconstruction in PET, Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 99 (2010) 219-229. DOI |
34 | D. Yoon, J. Jung, K. Hong, K. Lee, T. Suh, GPU-based prompt gamma ray imaging from boron neutron capture therapy, Med. Phys. 42 (2015) 165-169. |
35 | C. Chou, Y. Dong, Y. Hung, et al., Accelerating image reconstruction in dual-head PET system by GPU and symmetry properties, PloS One 7 (2012), e50540. |
36 | P. Zanzonico, An Overview of Nuclear Imaging, Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, 2019. |