1 |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, What is a derived concentration guideline level (DCGL)? [Internet] Accessed, https://epa.gov/radiation/what-derived-concentration-guideline-level-dcgl, 2020. Available from:.
|
2 |
H.W. Seo, W. Sohn, Scenario options to calculation of Derived Concentration Guideline Levels for a multi-unit decommissioning site, Ann. Nucl. Energy 133 (2019) 347-358.
DOI
|
3 |
U.S. Nuclear Ragulatory Commission, Residual Radionuclide Contamination within and Around Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-4289, 1986.
|
4 |
Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Regulations for the Management of Low and Intermediate Level RadioactiveWaste, Notice No. 2017-65, 2017 (In Korean).
|
5 |
Argonne National Laboratory, User's Manual for RESRAD Version 6, ANL/EAD-4, 2001.
|
6 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Consolidated decommissioning guidance, characterization, survey, and Determination of radiological criteria, NUREG-1757, Rev 1 (2006).
|
7 |
Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Yankee nuclear plant station license termination plan, Rev 1 (2004).
|
8 |
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Development of Technology in Radiation Safety Regulations, KINS/GR-297, 2005.
|
9 |
Electric Power Research Institute, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 Decommissioning Experience Report Detailed Experiences 1999-2008, 2008.
|
10 |
Electric Power Research Institute, Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Expereience Report, Detailed Experiences 1996-2006, 2006.
|
11 |
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Radionucldies for Consideration during Rancho Seco Site Characterization or Final Status Surveys, 2005.
|
12 |
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Table of nuclides [Internet] Accessed 2019, Available from: http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/nuchart.
|
13 |
H.W. Seo, W. Sohn, Calculation of preliminary site-specific DCGLs for nuclear power plant decommissioning using hybrid scenarios, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (4) (2019) 1098-1108.
DOI
|
14 |
J. Byon, S. Park, S. Ahn, Derivation of preliminary derived concentration guideline levels for surface soil at Kori Unit 1 by RESRAD probabilistic analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (8) (2018) 1289-1297.
DOI
|
15 |
U.S. Nuclear Ragulatory Commission, Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM), NUREG-1575, Rev 1 (2000).
|
16 |
ZionSolutions, Technocal support document for potential radionuclides of concern during the decommissioning of the zion station, Rev 1 (2012).
|
17 |
U.S. Nuclear Ragulatory Commission, Technology, Safety and Cost of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station, vol. 1, NUREG/CR-0130, 1978.
|
18 |
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Development of Regulatory Requirements for Clearance of Radioactive Waste, KINS/RR-144, 2002.
|
19 |
Pacific Gas, Electric Company, Radionuclide Selection for, DCGL Development, 2012.
|
20 |
Argonne National Laboratory, Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil and Building Structures, 2015.
|
21 |
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Supplementation an V&V of Integrated Dose Assessment Code Package, KINS/HR-1357, 2014.
|
22 |
Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station, Comparison of dose impacts from alternative exposure scenarios, Rev 0 (2005).
|
23 |
N.C. Dyer, T.E. Bechtold, Radionuclides in United States Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, WINCO-1191, IDAHO National Engineering Laboratory, 1994.
|
24 |
U.S. Nuclear Ragulatory Commission, Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials, NUREG/CR-3474, 1984.
|
25 |
Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Criteria for Reuse of Site and Builings after Completion of Decommissioning of Nucelar Facilities, Notice No. 2016-33, 2016 (In Korean).
|