Artificial neural network for predicting nuclear power plant dynamic behaviors |
El-Sefy, M.
(Department of Civil Engineering, NSERC-CREATE Program on Canadian Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Resilience Under Systemic Risk, McMaster University)
Yosri, A. (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute for Multi-hazard Systemic Risk Studies (INTERFACE), McMaster University) El-Dakhakhni, W. (Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, NSERC-CaNRisk-CREATE Program and teh INTERFACE Institute, McMaster University) Nagasaki, S. (Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University) Wiebe, L. (Department of Civil Engineering, NSERC-CREATE Program on Canadian Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Resilience Under Systemic Risk, McMaster University) |
1 | S.R. Patra, R. Jehadeesan, S. Rajeswari, S.A. Satyamurthy, Artificial neural network model for intermediate heat exchanger of nuclear reactor, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 1 (2010). |
2 | T.M. Mitchell, Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997. |
3 | F.J. Montans, F. Chinesta, R. Gomez-Bombarelli, J.N. Kutz, Data-driven modeling and learning in science and engineering, Compt. Rendus Mec. 347 (2019) 845-855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.009. DOI |
4 | K.R. Holdaway, Harness Oil and Gas Big Data with Analytics: Optimize Exploration and Production with Data-Driven Models, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey., 2014. |
5 | A. Burchard-levine, S. Liu, F. Vince, M. Li, A. Ostfeld, A hybrid evolutionary data driven model for river water quality early warning, J. Environ. Manag. 143 (2014) 8-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.017. DOI |
6 | D. Solomatine, A. Ostfeld, Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches approaches, J. Hydroinf. 10 (2008), https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2008.015. DOI |
7 | R.E. Uhrig, Use of neural networks in nuclear power plants, ISA Trans. 32(1993) 139-145. DOI |
8 | J.G. Thakkar, Correlation of Theory and Experiment for the Dynamics of a Pressurized Water Reactor, University of Tennessee, 1975. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2696%0A%0A. |
9 | H. Mustafidah, S. Hartati, R. Wardoyo, A. Harjoko, Selection of most appropriate backpropagation training algorithm in data pattern recognition, Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol. 14 (2014) 92-95. DOI |
10 | B. Sharma, P.K. Venugopalan, Comparison of neural network training functions for hematoma classification in brain CT images, IOSR J. Comput. Eng. 16 (2014) 31-35. |
11 | M. Moller, Efficient Training of Feed-Forward Neural Networks, Aarhus University, Computer Science Department, Ph.D. Thesis, 1997. |
12 | G. Cybenkot, Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, Math. Control. Signals, Syst. 2 (1989) 303-314. DOI |
13 | S. Arda, K.E. Holbert, J. Undrill, Development of a linearized model of a pressurized water reactor generating station for power system dynamic simulations, in: 45th North Am. Power Symp, NAPS, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666832, 2013. DOI |
14 | A.I. Sanchez, J.F. Villanueva, S. Carlos, S. Martorell, Uncertainty analysis of a large break loss of coolant accident in a pressurized water reactor using nonparametric methods, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 174 (2018) 19-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.005. DOI |
15 | M.I. Radaideh, W.A. Wieselquist, O. Ridge, T. Kozlowski, A new framework for sampling-based uncertainty quantification of the six-group reactor kinetic parameters, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.043. DOI |
16 | C.S. Brown, H. Zhang, Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis with CASL Core Simulator VERA-CS, Ann. Nucl. Energy J. 95 (2016) 188-201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.016. DOI |
17 | H.H. Kang, M. Kaya, S. Hajimirza, A data driven artificial neural network model for predicting radiative properties of metallic packed beds, Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. (2019) 66-72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.01.013. DOI |
18 | J. Li, J. Cheng, J. Shi, F. Huang, Brief introduction of back propagation (BP) neural network algorithm and its improvement, Adv. Comput. Sci. Inf. Eng. 169 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30223-7_87. DOI |
19 | T. Mikolov, M. Karafiat, L. Burget, J. Cernock, S. Khudanpur, Recurrent neural network based language model, in: Interspeech, 2010. |
20 | M.F. Moller, A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning, Neural Network. 6 (1993) 525-533. DOI |
21 | M.T. Hagan, M.B. Menhaj, Training feedforward networks with the marquardt algorithm, IEEE Trans. Neural Network. 5 (1994) 2-6. |
22 | H. Sug, The effect of training set size for the performance of neural networks of classification, WSEAS Trans. Comput. 9 (2010) 1297-1306. |
23 | D. Maljovec, S. Liu, B. Wang, D. Mandelli, P. Bremer, V. Pascucci, C. Smith, Analyzing simulation-based PRA data through traditional and topological clustering : a BWR station blackout case study, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145 (2016) 262-276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.001. DOI |
24 | Y. Singh, A.S. Chauhan, Neural networks in data mining, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 5 (2009) 36-42. |
25 | H. Bao, N.T. Dinh, J.W. Lane, R.W. Youngblood, A data-driven framework for error estimation and mesh-model optimization in system-level thermal-hydraulic simulation, Nucl. Eng. Des. 349 (2019) 27-45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.04.023. DOI |
26 | M. Ali, Lumped Parameter, State Variable Dynamic Models for U-Tube Recirculation Type Nuclear Steam Generators, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1976, https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2548%0A%0A. |
27 | MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2018a, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States, 2018. |
28 | S. Arda, Implementing a Nuclear Power Plant Model for Evaluating Load-Following Capability on a Small Grid, MASc Thesis, Arizona State University, 2013. |
29 | B. Puchalski, T.A. Rutkowski, K. Duzinkiewicz, Nodal models of Pressurized Water Reactor core for control purposes - a comparison study, Nucl. Eng. Des. 322 (2017) 444-463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.07.005. DOI |
30 | Y. Perin, J. Jimenez, Application of the best-estimate plus uncertainty approach on a BWR ATWS transient using the NURESIM European code platform, Nucl. Eng. Des. 321 (2017) 48-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.018. DOI |
31 | R. Rallo, A. Arenas, F. Giralt, Neural virtual sensor for the inferential prediction of product quality from process variables, Comput. Chem. Eng. 26 (2002) 1735-1754, 26. DOI |
32 | S.G. Zimmerman, J.C. Brittingham, M.L. Reed, R.P. Bandera, P.F. Crawley, PWR Reactor Physics Methodology Using CASMO-4/SIMULATE-3, Arizona Public Service Company, 1999. |
33 | M. El-Sefy, M. Ezzeldin, W. El-Dakhakhni, S. Nagasaki, L. Wiebe, Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of core damage under different transients using system dynamics simulation approach, Chapter 4, Ph.D. Thesis, 2021, http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26246. |
34 | E. Arce-Medina, J.I. Paz-Paredes, Artificial neural network modeling techniques applied to the hydrodesulfurization process, Math. Comput. Model. 49 (2009) 207-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.010. DOI |
35 | Z. Guo, R.E. Uhrig, Use of artificial neural networks to analyze nuclear power plant performance, Nucl. Technol. 5450 (2017), https://doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34701. DOI |
36 | C. Demaziere, I. P azsit, Evaluation of the boron dilution method for moderator temperature coefficient measurements, Nucl. Technol. 140 (2002) 147-163. DOI |
37 | A. Varuttamaseni, Bayesian Network Representing System Dynamics in Risk Analysis of Nuclear Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, 2011. |
38 | United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear power reactors, 2017. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0046.html. |
39 | T.W. Kerlin, E.M. Katz, J.G. Thakkar, J.E. Strange, Theoretical and experimental dynamic analysis of the HB Robinson nuclear plant, Nucl. Technol. 30 (1976) 299-316, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31645. DOI |
40 | S. Lawrence, C.L. Giles, A.C. Tsoi, Lessons in neural network training: overfitting may be harder than expected, in: Proc. Fourteenth Natl. Conf. Artif. Intell. AAAI-97, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1997, pp. 540-545. |
41 | E.M. Johansson, F.U. Dowla, D.M. Goodman, Backpropagation learning for multilayer feed-forward neural networks using the conjugate gradient method, Int. J. Neural Syst. 2 (1992) 291-301. DOI |
42 | P. Romojaro, F. Alvarez-Velarde, N. Garcia-Herranz, Sensitivity methods for effective delayed neutron fraction and neutron generation time with summon, Ann. Nucl. Energy 126 (2019) 410-418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.042. DOI |
43 | M. El-Sefy, M. Ezzeldin, W. El-Dakhakhni, L. Wiebe, S. Nagasaki, System dynamics simulation of the thermal dynamic processes in nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1540-1553, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.04.017. DOI |
44 | M. Knochenhauer, J.E. Holmberg, Guidance for the Definition and Application of Probabilistic Safety Criteria, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, 2011. |
45 | S. Haykin, Neural Networks, second ed., A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, United States, 1999. |
46 | A.H. Gandomi, D.A. Roke, Advances in Engineering Software Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools, Adv. Eng. Software 88 (2015) 63-72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007. DOI |
47 | S. Xu, L. Chen, A novel approach for determining the optimal number of hidden layer neurons for FNN's and its application in data mining, in: 5th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Appl, 2008, pp. 683-686. |
48 | R. Hecht-Nielsen, Kolmogorov's mapping neural network existence theorem, in: IEEE First Int. Conf, Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, 1987. |
49 | R. Setiono, L.C.K. Hui, Use of a quasi-Newton method in a feedforward neural network construction algorithm, IEEE Trans. Neural Network. 6 (1995), 0-4. DOI |
50 | C. Perez, Neural Networks Using Matlab. Cluster Analysis and Classification, Lulu Press, Inc, 2019. |
51 | A.Y. Krylatov, A.P. Hirokolobova, Projection approach versus gradient descent for network' s flows assignment problem, Learn. Intell. Optim. (2017) 7-69404, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69404-7_29. DOI |
52 | F.G. Filip, Decision support and control for large-scale complex systems, Annu. Rev. Contr. 32 (2008) 61-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2008.03.002. DOI |
53 | G. Phillips-Wren, Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522516.ch2. DOI |
54 | J. Zhang, F. Wang, K. Wang, W. Lin, X. Xu, C. Chen, Data-driven intelligent transportation Systems : a survey, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 12 (2011) 1624-1639, https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2158001. DOI |
55 | N.M. Nawi, R.S. Ransing, M.R. Ransing, An improved conjugate gradient based learning algorithm for back propagation neural networks, Int. J. Comput. Intell. (2008) 46-55. |
56 | I.S. Korovin, I.A. Kalyaev, Modern decision support systems in oil industry: types, approaches and applications, in: Int. Conf. Test, Meas. Comput. Method, 2015, pp. 141-144. |
57 | N. Tamimi, S. Samani, M. Minaei, F. Harirchi, An Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System for Unconventional Field Development Design, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-249. DOI |
58 | M. Ratz, A.P. Javadi, M. Baranski, K. Finkbeiner, D. Muller, Automated data-driven modeling of building energy systems via machine learning algorithms, Energy Build. 202 (2019), 109384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109384. DOI |
59 | IAEA, Accident Monitoring Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, vol. 16, IAEA Nuclear Energy series NP-T-3, 2015. |
60 | J.H. Min, D. Kim, C. Park, Demonstration of the validity of the early warning in online monitoring system for nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Des. 349 (2019) 56-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.04.028. DOI |
61 | S. Ahmad, S.P. Simonovic, An intelligent decision support system for management of floods, Water Resour. Manag. (2006) 391-410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-0326-3. DOI |
62 | L. Fahrmeir, T. Kneib, S. Lang, B. Marx, Regression Models, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34333-9_2. DOI |
63 | N.P. Oxtoby, A.L. Young, D.M. Cash, T.L.S. Benzinger, A.M. Fagan, J.C. Morris, R.J. Bateman, N.C. Fox, J.M. Schott, D.C. Alexander, Data-driven models of dominantly-inherited Alzheimer's disease progression, Brain (2018) 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy050. DOI |
64 | M. Gomez, A. Tokuhiro, K. Welter, Q. Wu, Nuclear energy system's behavior and decision making using machine learning, Nucl. Eng. Des. 324 (2017) 27-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.08.020. DOI |
65 | T. Foshch, F. Portela, J. Machado, M. Maksimov, Regression models of the nuclear power unit VVER-1000 using data mining techniques, Procedia Comput. Sci. 100 (2016) 253-262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.151. DOI |
66 | O.I. Abiodun, A. Jantan, A.E. Omolara, K.V. Dada, N.A. Mohamed, H. Arshad, State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: a survey, Heliyon (2018), e00938, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018. DOI |
67 | K. O'Shea, R. Nash, An introduction to convolutional neural networks, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08458. |
68 | R. Battiti, First- and second-order methods for learning: between steepest descent and Newton's method, Neural Comput. 4 (1992) 141-166. DOI |