Analytic springback prediction in cylindrical tube bending for helical tube steam generator |
Ahn, Kwanghyun
(SMART Technology Development Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Lee, Kang-Heon (SMART Technology Development Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) Lee, Jae-Seon (SMART Technology Development Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) Won, Chanhee (Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Hanyang University) Yoon, Jonghun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University) |
1 | D.T. Ingersoll, Deliberately small reactors and the second nuclear era, Prog. Nucl. Energy 51 (2009) 589-603. DOI |
2 | S.W. Lee, S.H. Kim, Y.J. Chung, Development and steady state level experimental validation of TASS SMR core heat transfer model for the integral reactor SMART, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 1039-1048. DOI |
3 | D.T. Ingersoll, Deliberately small reactors and the second nuclear era, Prog. Nucl. Energy 51 (2009) 589-603. DOI |
4 | D.G. Prabhanjan, G.S.V. Ragbavan, T.J. Kennic, Comparison of heat transfer rates between a straight tube heat exchanger and a helically coiled heat exchanger, Int. Commun. Heat Mass 29 (2002) 185-191. DOI |
5 | M. Ilyas, F. Aydogan, Steam generator performance improvements for integral small modular reactors, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (2017) 1669-1679. DOI |
6 | Y.-J. Chung, H.J. Kim, B.-D. Chung, W.J. Lee, M.-H. Kim, Thermo-hydraulic characteristics of the helically coiled tube and the condensate heat exchanger for SMART, Ann. Nucl. Energy 55 (2013) 49-54. DOI |
7 | https://www.linde-engineering.com. |
8 | J. Vujic, R.M. Bergmann, R. Skoda, M. Miletic, Small modular reactors: simpler, safer, cheaper? Energy 45 (2012) 288-295. DOI |
9 | X. Yang, C. Choi, N.K. Sever, T. Altan, Prediction of springback in air-bending of Advanced High Strength steel (DP780) considering Young's modulus variation and with a piecewise hardening function, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 105 (2016) 266-272. DOI |
10 | J. Naofal, H.M. Naeini, S. Mazdak, Effects of hardening model and variation of elastic modulus on springback prediction in roll forming, Metals 9 (2019) 1-13. DOI |
11 | P.-A. Eggertsen, K. Mattiasson, On constitutive modeling for springback analysis, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 52 (2010) 804-818. DOI |
12 | J. Liu, H. Yang, M. Zhan, Z. Jiang, Accurate prediction of the profile of thickwalled titanium alloy tube in rotary-draw bending considering strengthdifferential effect, Comput. Mater. Sci. 60 (2012) 113-122. DOI |
13 | F. Yoshida, T. Uemori, K. Fujiwara, Elastic-plastic behavior of steel sheets under in-plane cyclic tension-compression at large strain, Int. J. Plast. 18 (2002) 633-659. DOI |
14 | M. Zhan, H. Yang, L. Huang, R. Gu, Springback analysis of numerical control bending of thin-walled tube using numerical-analytic method, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 177 (2006) 197-201. DOI |
15 | J. Liao, X. Xue, M.-G. Lee, F. Barlat, J. Gracio, On twist springback prediction of asymmetric tube in rotary draw bending with different constitutive models, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 89 (2014) 311-322. DOI |
16 | J. Ma, H. Yang, H. Li, Z.J. Tao, G.J. Li, Springback prediction of titanium tube bending considering Bauschinger effect and Young's modulus variation, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 734 (2016), 032113. |
17 | S. Zhang, J. Wu, Springback prediction of three-dimensional variable curvature tube bending, Adv. Mech. Eng. 8 (2016) 1-13. |
18 | ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II: Materials, 2015. |
19 | W.-S. Lee, T.-N. Sun, Plastic flow behavior of Inconel 690 super alloy under compressive impact loading, Mater. Trans. 45 (2004) 2339-2345. DOI |
20 | ANSYS User's Manual, 2017. Version 17.2. |
21 | M.K. Rowinski, T.J. White, J. Zhao, Small and medium sized reactors (SMR): a review of technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44 (2015) 643-656. DOI |
22 | Z. Liu, J. Fan, Technology readiness assessment of small modular reactor (SMR) designs, Prog. Nucl. Energy 70 (2014) 20-28. DOI |
23 | G. Locatelli, C. Bingham, M. Mancini, Small modular reactors: a comprehensive overview of their economics and strategic aspects, Prog. Nucl. Energy 73 (2014) 75-85. DOI |
![]() |