Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.02.012

Evaluation of the effect of mechanical deformation on beam isocenter properties of the SC200 scanning beam delivery system  

Wang, Ming (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Zheng, Jinxing (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Song, Yuntao (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Li, Ming (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Zeng, Xianhu (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.52, no.9, 2020 , pp. 2064-2071 More about this Journal
Abstract
For proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) technology, the accuracy of the dose distribution in a patient is sensitive to the properties of the incident beam. However, mechanical deformation of the proton therapy facility may occur, and this could be an important factor affecting the proton dose distribution in patients. In this paper, we investigated the effect of deformation on an SC200 proton facility's beam isocenter properties. First, mechanical deformation of the PBS nozzle, L-shape plate, and gantry were simulated using a Finite Element code, ANSYS. Then, the impact of the mechanical deformation on the beam's isocenter properties was evaluated using empirical formulas. In addition, we considered the simplest case that could affect the properties of the incident beam (i.e. if only the bending magnet (BG3) has an error in its mounting alignment), and the effect of the beam optics offset on the isocenter characteristics was evaluated. The results showed that the deformation of the beam position in the X and Y direction was less than 0.27 mm, which meets the structural design requirements. Compared to the mechanical deformation of the L-shape plate, the deformation of the gantry had more influence on the beam's isocenter properties. When the error in the mounting alignment of the BG3 is equal to or more than 0.3 mm, the beam deformation at the isocenter exceeds the maximum accepted deformation limits. Generally speaking, for the current design of the SC200 scanning beam delivery system, the effects of mechanical deformation meet the maximum accepted beam deformation limits. In order to further study the effect of the incident beam optics on the isocenter properties, a fine-scale Monte Carlo model including factors relating to the PBS nozzle and the BG3 should be developed in future research.
Keywords
SC200; Proton therapy; PBS nozzle; Gantry; Beam isocenter properties;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R.R. Wilson, Radiological use of fast protons, Radiology 47 (5) (1946) 487-491.   DOI
2 H. Paganetti, Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (11) (2012) R99.   DOI
3 T.A. van de Water, A.J. Lomax, H.P. Bijl, et al., Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 79 (4) (2011) 1216-1224.   DOI
4 U. Mock, D. Georg, J. Bogner, et al., Treatment planning comparison of conventional, 3D conformal, and intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton therapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 58 (1) (2004) 147-154.   DOI
5 P.M. Rosenschold, S. Engelholm, L. Ohlhues, et al., Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking, Acta Oncol. 50 (6) (2011) 777-783.   DOI
6 https://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-in-operation.
7 T. Bortfeld, H. Paganetti, H. Kooy, MO-A-T-6B-01: proton beam radiotherapydthe state of the art, Med. Phys. 32 (2005) 2048-2049, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1999671.
8 A. Smith, M. Gillin, M. Bues, et al., The MD Anderson proton therapy system, Med. Phys. 36 (9Part1) (2009) 4068-4083.   DOI
9 Y. Jongen, W. Beeckman, P. Cohilis, The proton therapy system for MGH's NPTC: equipment description and progress report, Bull. Canc. Radiother. 83 (1996) 219s-222s.   DOI
10 C. Courtois, G. Boissonnat, C. Brusasco, et al., Characterization and performances of a monitoring ionization chamber dedicated to IBA-universal irradiation head for Pencil Beam Scanning, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 736 (2014) 112-117.   DOI
11 H. Paganetti, Monte Carlo calculations for absolute dosimetry to determine machine outputs for proton therapy fields, Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (11) (2006) 2801.   DOI
12 H. Bouchard, J. Seuntjens, Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams, Med. Phys. 31 (9) (2004) 2454-2465.   DOI
13 B. Marchand, D. Prieels, B. Bauvir, et al., IBA proton pencil beam scanning: an innovative solution for cancer treatment, Proc. EPAC (2000) 2539-2541.
14 J. Flanz, T. Bortfeld, Evolution of technology to optimize the delivery of proton therapy: the third generation, Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 23 (2) (2013) 142-148. WB Saunders.   DOI
15 J. Shen, W. Liu, A. Anand, et al., Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics, Med. Phys. 42 (3) (2015) 1335-1340, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4908208.   DOI
16 Y. Lin, B. Clasie, H.M. Lu, et al., Impacts of gantry angle dependent scanning beam properties on proton PBS treatment, Phys. Med. Biol. 62 (2) (2017) 344-357.   DOI
17 D. Meer, Medical Physics Commissioning, 2018. 1804.08983.
18 M. Li, J.X. Zheng, Y.T. Song, et al., Beam optics and isocenter property of SC200 proton therapy gantry, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29 (8) (2018) 112.   DOI
19 X. Liu, Design of the Gantry Beamline for a Proton Therapy Facilty, Huazhong University Of Science and Technology, Hubei, 1952.
20 G. Karamysheva, Y. Bi, G. Chen, et al., Compact superconducting cyclotron SC200 for proton therapy, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference, 2016, pp. 371-373.
21 M. Wang, J. Zheng, Y. Song, et al., Monte Carlo simulation using TOPAS for gas chamber design of PBS nozzle in superconducting proton therapy facility, Nucl. Technol. (2019) 1-12.