1 |
B. Sjenitzer, Analysis of the Belgian nuclear fuel cycle using the ANICCA code, SCK.CEN External Report, SCK.CEN/ER-263 (2014).
|
2 |
I. Merino, et al., ANICCA Code and the Belgian Nuclear Fuel Cycle, European Nuclear Conference (ENC), Warsaw (Poland), 2016, pp. 45-54. URL: https://www.euronuclear.org/events/enc/enc2016/transactions/ENC2016-transactions.pdf.
|
3 |
A.V. Skarbeli, et al., Quantification of the differences introduced by nuclear fuel cycle simulators in advanced scenario studies, Ann. Nucl. Energy 137 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107160.
|
4 |
C. Coquelet-Pascal, COSI6, A tool for nuclear transition scenario studies and application to SFR deployment scenarios with minor actinide transmutation, Nucl. Technol. 192 (2) (2015) 91-110, https://doi.org/10.13182/nt15-20.
DOI
|
5 |
K.D. Huff, Fundamental concepts in the CYCLUS nuclear fuel cycle simulation framework, arXiv:1509.03604, Adv. Eng. Software 94 (2016) 46-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.014. URL, http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03604.
DOI
|
6 |
A.M. Yacout, et al., Modeling the nuclear fuel cycle, in: The 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, MA, July 17-21, 2005.
|
7 |
Nuclear Energy Agency, Benchmark Study on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Transition Scenarios Analysis Codes, vol. 16, NEA/NSC/WPFC/DOC, 2012, 2012. URL, https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/docs/2012/nsc-wpfc-doc2012-16.pdf330.
|
8 |
R. Gregg, C. Grove, Analysis of the UK nuclear fission roadmap using the 28 ORION fuel cycle modeling code, in: Proceedings of the IChemE Nuclear Fuel Cycle Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2012.
|
9 |
A. Brolly, Physical model of the nuclear fuel cycle simulation code SITON, Ann. Nucl. Energy 99 (2017) 471-483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.10.001.
DOI
|
10 |
I. Merino, et al., Cross check of the new economic and mass balance features of the fuel cycle scenario code TR_EVOL, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2 (2016) 33, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2016029.
DOI
|
11 |
J.W. Bae, et al., Standardized verification of the Cyclus fuel cycle simulator, Ann. Nucl. Energy 128 (2019) 288-291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.014.
DOI
|
12 |
J.J. Jacobson, et al., Verifiable fuel cycle simulation model (VISION): a tool for analyzing nuclear fuel cycle futures, Nucl. Technol. 172 (2010) 157-178. November.
DOI
|
13 |
International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (VISTA), IAEA, TECDOC-1535.
|
14 |
B. Feng, et al., Standardized verification of fuel cycle modeling, Ann. Nucl. Energy 94 (2016) 300-312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.03.002.
DOI
|
15 |
A. Stankovskiy, G. Van den Eynde, Advanced method for calculations of core burn-up, activation of structural materials and spallation products accumulation in accelerator-driven systems, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. (2012) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/545103.
|
16 |
Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear fuel cycle transition scenario studies, status report: the Belgian implementation scenario, URL: https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/reports/2009/nea6194_transition_scenario_studies.pdf, 2009,978-92-64-99068-5.
|
17 |
C. Artioli, et al., Optimization of the 365 minor actinides transmutation in ADS: the European Facility for Industrial Transmutation EFIT-Pb concept, in: Eighth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Applications and Utilization of Accelerators, 2007. URL, https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT%3A562259376/Eighth-International-Topical-Meeting-on-Nuclear.
|
18 |
G. Van den Eynde, et al., An updated core design for the multi-purpose irradiation facility MYRRHA, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. (52) (2015).
|
19 |
A. Santamarina, et al., NEA, The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library. 370 Validation Results from JEF-2.2 to JEFF-3.1.1, vol. 6807, OECD, 2009, ISBN 978-92-64-99074-6. URL, https://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/nds_jefreports/jefreport-22/nea6807-jeff22.pdf.
|
20 |
RED-IMPACT Synthesis Report, Forschungszentrum Julich (FZJ): Julich, FZJ, Germany, 2008, ISBN 978-3-89336-538-8.
|
21 |
P. Baron, et al., A review of separation processes proposed for advanced fuel cycles based on technology readiness level assessments, Prog. Nucl. Energy 117 (2019) 103091.
DOI
|
22 |
P. Diehl, et al., WISE uranium project, URL, www.wise-uranium.org.
|
23 |
EG-AFCS, Working party on scientific issues of the fuel cycle, URL, https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpfc/index_afcs.html.
|
24 |
FANC, Second Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, Kingdom of Belgium, May 2006. National Report.
|
25 |
C.H. Clement, ICRP publication 119: compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP publication 60, Ann. ICRP 42 (4) (2013).
|
26 |
E. Supko, Parametric Study of Front-End Nuclear Fuel Cycle Costs Using Reprocessed Uranium, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2010, p. 1020659.
|
27 |
R. Baker, R.W. Ross, Comparison of the value of plutonium and uranium isotopes in fast reactors, in: Proc. Conf. Breeding, Economics, and Safety in Large Fast Breeder Reactors. ANL-679Z, 1963.
|
28 |
K.O. Ott, R.C. Borg, Derivation of consistent measures for the doubling time of fast breeder reactor fuel, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 62 (1977) 243.
DOI
|
29 |
C.J. Werner, et al., MCNP Users Manual - Code Version 6.2, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2017. LA-UR-17-29981.
|
30 |
M. Pusa, Rational approximations to the matrix exponential in burnup calculations, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 169 (2011) 155-167.
DOI
|
31 |
V. Tsibulskiy, et al., DESAE (Dynamic energy system- atomic energy) integrated computer model for performing global analysis in INPRO assessment studies, in: International Conference on Nuclear Engineering "ICONE 14" 17-20 July, 2006 (Miami, Florida, USA).
|
32 |
International Atomic Energy Agency, The Power Reactor Information System (PRIS) and its Extension to Non-electrical Applications, Decommissioning and Delayed Projects Information, IAEA, VIENNA, 2005. Technical Reports Series No.428.
|