Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.03.019

Experimental investigation of aerosols removal efficiency through self-priming venturi scrubber  

Ali, Suhail (Department of Nuclear Engineering, PIEAS)
Waheed, Khalid (Department of Nuclear Engineering, PIEAS)
Qureshi, Kamran (Department of Mechanical Engineering, PIEAS)
Irfan, Naseem (Department of Nuclear Engineering, PIEAS)
Ahmed, Masroor (Department of Nuclear Engineering, PIEAS)
Siddique, Waseem (Department of Mechanical Engineering, PIEAS)
Farooq, Amjad (Department of Nuclear Engineering, PIEAS)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.52, no.10, 2020 , pp. 2230-2237 More about this Journal
Abstract
Self-priming venturi scrubber is one of the most effective devices used to collect aerosols and soluble gas pollutants from gaseous stream during severe accident in a nuclear power plant. The present study focuses on investigation of dust particle removal efficiency of the venturi scrubber both experimentally and theoretically. Venturi scrubber captures the dust particles in tiny water droplets flowing into it. Inertial impaction is the main mechanism of particles collection in venturi scrubber. The water injected into venturi throat is in the form of jets through multiple holes present at venturi throat. In this study, aerosols removal efficiency of self-priming venturi scrubber was experimentally measured for different operating conditions. Alumina (Al2O3) particles with 0.4-㎛ diameter and 3950 kg/㎥ density were treated as aerosols. Removal efficiency was calculated for different gas flow rates i.e. 3-6 ㎥/h and liquid flow rates i.e. 0.009-0.025 ㎥/h. Experimental results depict that aerosols removal efficiency increases with the increase in throat velocity and liquid head. While at lower air flow rate of 3 ㎥/h, removal efficiency decreases with the increase in liquid head. A theoretical model of venturi scrubber was also employed and experimental results were compared with mathematical model. Experimental results are found to be in good agreement with theoretical results.
Keywords
Aerosols; Self-priming venturi scrubber; Filtered containment venting system; Particulate removal;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Noel de Nevers, Air Pollution Control Engineering, McGraw Hill, New York, 2000.
2 Majid Ali, Changqi Yan, Zhongning Sun, Jianjun Wang, Haifeng Gu, CFD simulation of dust particle removal efficiency of a venturi scrubber in CFX, Nucl. Eng. Des. 256 (2013b) 169-177.   DOI
3 A. Mohebbi, M. Taheri, J. Fathikaljahi, M.R. Talaie, Simulation of an orifice scrubber performance based on Eulerian/Lagrangian method, J. Hazard Mater. 100 (1-3) (2003) 13-25.   DOI
4 C.H. Jung, K.W. Lee, Filtration of fine particles by multiple liquid droplet and gas bubble systems, Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 29 (5) (1998) 389-401.   DOI
5 D.A. Powers, M.T. Leonard, R.O. Gauntt, R.Y. Lee, M. Salay, in: Accident Source Terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants Using High-Burnup or MVND2011-0128, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2011.
6 R.O. Schlueter, R.P. Schmitz, Filtered vented containments, Nucl. Eng. Des. 120 (1) (1990) 93-103.   DOI
7 D. Jacquemain, S. Guentay, S. Basu, M. Sonnenkalb, L. Lebel, J. Ball, H.J. Allelein, Liebana Martinez, B. Eckardt, N. Losch, OECD/NEA/CSNI Status Report on Filtered Containment Venting, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2014.
8 T. Mi, X.M. Yu, "Dust removal and desulphurization in a novel venturi scrubber." Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 62 (2012) 159-167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.07.010.   DOI
9 H. Rust, Ch T€annler, W. Heintz, D. Haschke, M. Nuala, R. Jakab, Pressure release of containments during severe accidents in Switzerland, Nucl. Eng. Des. 157 (3) (1995) 337-352.   DOI
10 Majid Ali, Changqi Yan, Zhongning Sun, Haifeng Gu, Khurram Mehboob, Dust particle removal efficiency of a venturi scrubber, Ann. Nucl. Energy 54 (2013a) 178-183.   DOI
11 M. Lehner, Aerosol separation efficiency of a venturi scrubber working in selfpriming mode, Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 28 (5) (1998) 389-402.   DOI
12 M. Lehner, F. Mayinger, Operating results and aerosol deposition of a venturi scrubber in self-priming operation, Chem. Eng. Process: Process Intensification 3 (34) (1995) 283-288.   DOI
13 W.H. Walton, A. Woolcock, E.G. Richardson, Aerodynamic Capture of Particles, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960.
14 Seymour Calvert, Lundgren Dale, Dilip S. Mehta, Venturi scrubber performance, J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 22 (7) (1972) 529-532.   DOI
15 Shui-Chow Yung, Seymour Calvert, Harry F. Barbarika, Venturi scrubber performance model, Environ. Sci. Technol. 12 (4) (1978) 456-459.   DOI
16 Richard H. Boll, Particle collection and pressure drop in venturi scrubbers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 12 (1) (1973) 40-50.   DOI
17 P.O. Nilsson, FILTRA-MVSS (multi venturi scrubber system), presentation to U.S, 2012. NRC page 26.
18 R.H. Boll, L.R. Fiais, P.W. Maurer, W.L. Thompson, Mean drop size in a full scale Venturi scrubber via transmissometer, Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 24 (1974) 934-938.   DOI
19 D. Leith, W. Licht, The collection efficiency of cyclone type particlecollectorsd-a new theoretical approach, AIChE Symp. Ser. Air Pollut. Control. 68 (1996) 196-206.
20 Kenneth GT. Hollands, Kailash C. Goel, A general method for predicting pressure loss in venturi scrubbers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 14 (1) (1975) 16-22.   DOI
21 Dean R. Dickinson, W.R. Marshall Jr., The rates of evaporation of sprays, AIChE J. 14 (4) (1968) 541-552.   DOI