Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.06.012

A study on DCGL determination and the classification of contaminated areas for preliminary decommission planning of KEPCO-NF nuclear fuel fabrication facility  

Cho, Seo-Yeon (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University)
Kim, Yong-Soo (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University)
Park, Da-Won (KEPCO Nuclear Fuel)
Park, Chan-Jun (KEPCO Nuclear Fuel)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.51, no.8, 2019 , pp. 1951-1956 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a part of the preliminary decommissioning plan of KEPCO-NF fuel fabrication facility, DCGLs of three target radionuclides, 234U, 235U, and 238U, were derived using RESRAD-BUILD code and contaminated areas of the facility were classified based on contamination levels from the derived DCGLs. From code simulations, one-room modeling results showed that the grinding room in building #2 was the most restrictive (DCGLgross = 10493.01 Bq/㎡). The DCGLgross results in contaminated areas from one-room modeling were slightly more conservative than three-room modeling. Prior to the code simulation, field survey and measurements conducted by each survey unit. For a conservative approach, the most restrictive DCGLgross in each survey unit was taken as a reference to classify the contaminated areas of the facility. Accordingly, seven rooms and 37 rooms in the nuclear-fuel buildings were classified as Class 1 and Class 2, respectively. As expected, fuel material handling and processing rooms such as the grinding room, sintering room, compressing room, and powder collecting room were included in the Class 1 area.
Keywords
DCGL; Decommissioning; Nuclear fuel fabrication facility; RESRAD-BUILD; MARSSIM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J.M. Peterson, J.P. Englert, Estimation of residual radioactivity within a shutdown fuel reprocessing plant, in: Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting, Niagara Falls, NY, USA, 1986.
2 KEPCO-NF. https://www.knfc.co.kr/eps, 2018.
3 C. Yu, D. Lepoire, J.-J. Cheng, E. Gnanapragasam, J. Arnish, B.M. Biwer, A.J. Zielen, W.A. Williams, A. Wallo, P.H.T. Jr, User's Manual for RESRAD-BUILD Version 3, Argonne National Laboratory, 2019.
4 W.E. Kennedy Jr., R.A. Peloquin, Residual Radioactive Contamination from Decommissioning: Technical Basis for Translating Contamination Levels to Annual Dose, 1990, p. 313. United States.
5 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3) (1991) 1-201.
6 P.W. Frame, E.W. Abelquist, Use of smears for assessing removable contamination, Health Phys. 76 (1999) S57-S66.   DOI
7 Westinghouse, Hematite Decommissioning Plan, License SNM-33, Docket No. 70-36, DO-04-004, 2005.
8 N. Nassar, M.H.E. Monged, Evaluation of doses to an individual from a contaminated area with radioactive material, Arab J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 50 (2) (2017) 250-257.
9 S. Hong, B. Brook, A nuclear-to-gas transition in South Korea: is it environmentally friendly or economically viable? Energy Policy 112 (2018) 67-73.   DOI
10 J.S. Min, K.W. Lee, H.R. Kim, C.W. Lee, Radiological assessment of the decontaminated and decommissioned Korea Research Reactor-1 building, Nucl. Eng. Des. 322 (2017) 492-496.   DOI
11 M. Laraia, Nuclear Decommissioning: Planning, Execution and International Experience, Elsevier Science, 2012.
12 E.W. Abelquist, Decommissioning Health Physics: A Handbook for MARSSIM Users, second ed., CRC Press, 2013.
13 U.S.NRC, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), 2000.