Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.01.018

Calculation of preliminary site-specific DCGLs for nuclear power plant decommissioning using hybrid scenarios  

Seo, Hyung-Woo (Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) Central Research Institute)
Sohn, Wook (Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) Central Research Institute)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.51, no.4, 2019 , pp. 1098-1108 More about this Journal
Abstract
Korea's first commercial nuclear power plant at Kori site was permanently shut down in 2017 and is currently in transition stage. Preparatory activities for decommissioning such as historical site assessment, characterization, and dismantling design are being actively carried out for successful D&D (Dismantling and Decontamination) at Kori site. The ultimate goal of decommissioning will be to ensure the safety of workers and residents that may arise during the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and, thereby finally returning the site to its original status in accordance with the release criteria. Upon completion of decommissioning, the resident's safety at a site released will be assessed from the evaluation of dose caused by radionuclides expected to be present or detected at the site. Although the U.S. commercial nuclear power plants with decommissioning experience use different site release criteria, most of them are 0.25 mSv/y. In Korea, both the unrestricted and restricted release criteria have been set to 0.1 mSv/y by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission. However, since the dose is difficult to measure, measurable concentration guideline levels for residual radionuclides that result in dose equivalent to the site release criteria should be derived. For this derivation, site reuse scenario, selection of potential radionuclides, and systematic methodology should be developed in planning stage of Kori site decommissioning. In this paper, for calculation of a preliminary site-specific Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs) for the Nuclear Power Plant site, a novel approach has been developed which can fully reflect practical reuse plans of the Kori site by taking into account multiple site reuse scenarios sequentially, thereby striking a remarkable distinction with conventional approaches which considers only a single site scenario.
Keywords
Decommissioning; RESRAD; Site release; DCGL; Residual activity; Farmer scenario; Industrial worker scenario;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 NRC, Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Characterization, Survey, and Determination of Radiological Criteria, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2006.
2 NRC, Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984.
3 NRC, "Technology, Safety and Cost of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1978.
4 NSSC, Regulations for the Management of Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste, Nuclear Safey and Security Commission, 2017.
5 SMUD, Radionucldies for Consideration during Rancho Seco Site Characterization or Final Status Surveys, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, 2005.
6 PG&E, Radionuclide Selection for DCGL Development, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 2012.
7 ZionSolutions, Technocal Support Document for Potential Radionuclides of Concern during the Decommissioning of the Zion Station, 2012.
8 IAEA, Release of Sites from Regulatory Control on Termination of Practices, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006, pp. 5-7. No. WS-G-5.1.
9 NSSC, Criteria for Reuse of Site and Builings after Completion of Decommissioning of Nucelar Facilities, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2016.
10 NRC, Probablistic Dose Analysis Using Parameter Distributions Developed for RESRAD and RESRAD-NUILD Codes, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000. NUREG/CR-6676.
11 KINS, Development of Technology in Radiation Safety Regulations, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, KINS/GR-297, 2005, pp. 391-405.
12 ANL, User's Manual for RESRAD Version 6, Argonne National Laboratory, 2001.
13 ANL, Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil and Building Structures, Argonne National Laboratory, 2015.
14 NRC, Rancho Seco License Termination Plan, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2006, pp. 6-7. Chapt. 6.
15 NRC, Development of Probabilistic RESRAD 6.0 and RESRAD-BUILD 3.0 Computer Codes, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000. NUREG/CR-6697.
16 RSNGS, Comparison of Dose Impacts from Alternative Exposure Scenario, Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station, 2005. Rev. 0.
17 NSSC, 2016 Nuclear Safety Yearbook, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, 2017.
18 KINS, Supplementation an V&V of Integrated Dose Assessment Code Package, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, KINS/HR-1357, 2014.
19 KINS, Development of Regulatory Requirements for Clearance of Radioactive Waste, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, KINS/RR-144, 2002.