1 |
Y.A.N.G. Joon-Eon, Fukushima Dai-ichi accident: lessoned learned from the risk perspective, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 46 (1) (Feb. 2014).
|
2 |
A. Stutzke, Scoping estimates of multiunit accident risk, in: Proceedings of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 12), June 2014 (Honolulu, Hawaii).
|
3 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Resolution of Generic Safety Issues: Task CH2: Design (NUREG-0933), Washington, D.C, 2011.
|
4 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 50, Appendix a - General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants.
|
5 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reactor Safety Study - an Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-1400), Washington, D.C, 1975.
|
6 |
IAEA, Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants, 75-INSAG-3 Rev. 1, INSAG-12, 1999.
|
7 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 100.11, Determination of Exclusion Area, Low Population Zone, and Population Centre Distance.
|
8 |
Pickard Lowe, Garrick, Inc, Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment - Section 13.3 Risk of Two Unit Station, Prepared for Public Service Company of New Hampshire, PLG-0300, 1983.
|
9 |
K.N. Fleming, Application of probabilistic risk assessment to multi-unit sites, in: Presented to the National Academy of Sciences Fukushima Committee, June 24, 2013.
|
10 |
T. Hakata, Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (2007) 883-894.
DOI
|
11 |
Keisuke Kondo1, Toshio Teragaki1, Hiroshi Abe, Development of Multi-unit Seismic Response Correlation and Level 1 Seismic PRA Model, SMiRT-23, Manchester, United Kingdom - August 10-14, 2015.
|
12 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Proposed Commission Policy Statement on Severe Accidents and Related Views on Nuclear Reactor Regulation, SECY-82-1B, Washington, D.C, 1982.
|
13 |
C.W. Carthew, F.A. Knautz, G.T. Chan, The design of the vacuum building for pickering generating station, Nucl. Eng. Des. 23 (2) (November 1972).
|
14 |
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, in: Summary Report of the International Workshop on Multi-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment, 2014.
|
15 |
Lisa Bengtsson, Jan-Erik Holmberg, Jukka Rossi, Michael Knochenhauer, Probabilistic Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants, Phases 2-4/Final Report, 2011. Report number: 2010:35 ISSN: 2000-0456.
|
16 |
M.D. Muhlheim, G.F. Flanagan, W.P. Poore III, Initiating Events for Multireactor Plant Sites (ORNL/TM-2014/533), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2014.
|
17 |
S. Zhang, J. Tong, J. Zhao, An integrated modeling approach for event sequence development in multi-unit probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 155 (2016) 147-159.
DOI
|
18 |
S.D. Weerakkody, Results of screening of proposed generic issue PRE-GI-0001, in: Multiunit Core Damage Events," Memorandum, 2013.
|
19 |
Changkyung Seong, Gyunyoung Heo, Sejin Baek, Ji Woong Yoon, Man Cheol Kim, Analysis of the technical status of multiunit risk assessment in nuclear power plants, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 50 (2018).
|
20 |
T.D. Le Duy, D. Vasseur, E. Serdet, Probabilistic safety assessment of twin-unit nuclear sites: methodological elements, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145 (2016) 250-261.
DOI
|
21 |
C.S. Kumar, V. Hassija, K. Velusamy, V. Balasubramaniyan, Integrated risk assessment for multi-unit NPP sites - a comparison, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 53-62.
DOI
|
22 |
US NRC, Research Activities FY 2018-2020, NUREG-1925, Rev, vol. 4, 2018.
|
23 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Action Plan Developed as a Result of the TMI-2 Accident (NUREG-0660), Washington, D.C, 1980.
|
24 |
Joon-Eon Yang, Development of Site Risk Assessment and Management Technology Including Extreme External Events, KAERI/RR-4225/2016, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2017.
|
25 |
H.-G. Lim, D.-S. Kim, S.H. Han, J.-E. Yang, Development of logical structure for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1210-1216.
DOI
|
26 |
Jung Han Kim, Min Kyu Kim, In-Kil Choi, Daegi Hahm, Preliminary research on the quantification of failure frequency by multi-hazard, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea, October 26-27, 2017.
|
27 |
Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report, Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., 2012. June 20.
|
28 |
S. Schroer, M. Modarres, An event classification schema for evaluating site risk in a multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 117 (2013) 40-51.
DOI
|
29 |
M. James, Acton and Mark Hibbs, Why Fukushima Was Preventable, The Carnegie Papers, Nuclear Policy, March 2012.
|
30 |
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Regulatory Document REGDOC 2.4.2, Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, 2014.
|
31 |
Yasushi Okano, Hidemasa Yamano, Study on combination hazard curve of forest fire with lightning and strong wind, in: Asian Symposium on Risk Assessment and Management 2017, PACIFICO Yokohama, Yokohama, Japan, 13 - 15, November 2017.
|
32 |
Matthias Krause, IAEA coordinated research project on PSA benchmarks for multi-unit/multi-reactor sites, in: International Workshop on Status of Site Level PSA (Including Multi-unit PSA) Development, Munich, July 2018.
|
33 |
S.H. Han, K. Oh, H.-G. Lim, J.-E. Yang, AIMS-MUPSA software package for multi-unit PSA, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1255-1265.
DOI
|
34 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plant Operation, (NUREG-0880), Rev. 1, for Comment, Washington, D.C, 1983.
|
35 |
D.-S. Kim, S.H. Han, J.H. Park, H.-G. Lim, J.H. Kim, Multi-unit Level 1 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1217-1233.
DOI
|
36 |
J. Cho, S.H. Han, D.-S. Kim, H.-G. Lim, Multi-unit Level 2 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1234-1245.
DOI
|
37 |
S.-Y. Kim, Y.H. Jung, S.H. Han, S.-J. Han, H.-G. Lim, Multi-unit Level 3 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 1246-1254.
DOI
|
38 |
IAEA International Workshop on the Safety of Multi-unit Nuclear Power Plant Sites against External Natural Hazards, Mumbai, India, October 17-19, 2012.
|
39 |
Shahen Poghosyan, Ovidiu Coman, IAEA activities on multi-unit PSA and risk aggregation, in: International Workshop on Status of Site Level PSA (Including Multi-unit PSA) Development, Munich, July 2018.
|
40 |
Smain Yalaoui, Akl Yolande, WGRISK Site-level PSA Project: Status Update and Preliminary Insights for the Risk Aggregation Focus Area, PSA 2017, Pittsburgh, PA, September 24-28, 2017.
|
41 |
W.S. Jung, Joon-Eo E. Yang, J. Ha, A new method to evaluate alternate AC power source effects in multi-unit nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 82 (2003) 165-172.
DOI
|
42 |
J.J. Ha, Safety goals - for A unit or site?, in: 2001 ANS Winter Meeting, USA, 2001.
|
43 |
Mohammad Modarres, Some misconceptions about multi-unit PSAs, in: International Workshop on Status of Site Level PSA, Munich, Germany, 2018.
|
44 |
Mohammad Modarres, Probabilistic risk assessment of multi-unit nuclear power plant sites: advances and implication on the safety goals, in: Seminar Presentation, Ohio State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2016.
|