1 |
V.M. Bier, S.C. Jang, Perspective: defaults and incentives in risk-informed regulation, Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 5 (4) (1999) 635-644.
DOI
|
2 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reactor Safety Study: an Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, 1975. WASH-1400, Washington, D.C.
|
3 |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, The Use of PRA in Risk-informed Applications, Draft Report for Comment, 1997. NUREG-1602, Washington, D.C.
|
4 |
V.M. Bier, After 15 Years of Quantitative Safety Goals, Now what? American Nuclear Society Executive Conference on Policy implications of Risk-Based Regulation, Washington, D.C, 1994.
|
5 |
J.M. Griesmeyer, D. Okrent, "On the Development of Quantitative Risk Acceptance Criteria", an Approach to Quantitative Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C, 1980. NUREG-0739.
|
6 |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance, "Standard Default Exposure Factors", Interim Final, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 1991. OSWER Directive 9285.6-03, Washington, D.C.
|
7 |
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-s-2008 Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, 2013. ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2013, ASME, New York.
|
8 |
M.G. Morgan, M. Henrion, Uncertainty: a Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Polish Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
|
9 |
National Research Council, Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, 1994.
|