Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.03.022

Sensitivity studies in spent fuel pool criticality safety analysis for APR-1400 nuclear power plants  

Al Awad, Abdulrahman S. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Sharjah, University City Road)
Habashy, Abdalla (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Sharjah, University City Road)
Metwally, Walid A. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Sharjah, University City Road)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.50, no.5, 2018 , pp. 709-716 More about this Journal
Abstract
A criticality safety analysis was performed for the APR-1400 spent fuel pool region-II to ensure the safe storage of spent fuel, with credit taken for depletion and in-rack neutron absorbers (Metamic panels). PLUS7 fuel assembly was modeled using TRITON-NEWT of SCALE-6.1. The burnup-dependent cross-section library was generated under limiting core-operating conditions with 5%-w U-235 initial enrichment. MCNP5 was used to evaluate the neutron multiplication factor in an infinite array of rack cells with the axially nonuniformly burnt PLUS7 assemblies under normal, abnormal, and accident conditions; including all biases and uncertainties. The main purpose of this study is to investigate reactivity variations due to the critical depletion and reactor operation parameters. The approach, assumptions, and modeling methods were verified by analyzing the contents of the most important fissile and the associated reactivity effects. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidance on k-eff being less than 1.0 for spent fuel pools filled with unborated water was the main criterion used in this study. It was found that assemblies with 49.0 GWd/MTU and 5.0 w/o U-235 initial enrichment loaded in Region-II satisfy this criterion. Moreover, it was found that the end effect resulted in a positive bias, thus ensuring its consideration.
Keywords
Burnup Credit; Criticality Safety Analysis; Depletion Analysis; Nonuniform Burnup; Spent Fuel Pool;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Westinghouse Electric Company, Spent Fuel Storage Racks Criticality Analysis, APP-GW-GLR-029-Revision 0, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, 2006.
2 R.J. McConn Jr., C.J. Gesh, R.T. Pagh, R.A. Rucker, R.G. Williamsiii, PNNL, Compendium of Material Composition Data for Radiation Transport Modeling, revision 1, 2011.
3 NRC, Criticality Safety of Fresh and Spent Fuel Storage and Handling, RAI-90-7939, NRC, 2015.
4 C. Park, H. Park, H. Shon, S. Hong, Y. Lee, End effect analysis with various axial burnup distributions in high density spent fuel storage racks, Ann. Nucl. Energy 81 (2015) 174-178.   DOI
5 NRC, Issue: Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transportation and Storage Casks, ISG-8, NRC, 2012.
6 Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), MCNP: a General Monte Carlo Nparticle Transport Code LA-UR-03-1987, Version 5, April 2003, 2003.
7 I.C. Gauld, Strategies for Application of Isotopic Uncertainties in Burnup Credit, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6811, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL/TM-2001/257), United States, 2002.
8 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Criticality Analysis for US-APWR New and Spent Fuel Storage Racks, MUAP-07032-NP, 2008.
9 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Review of Axial Burnup Distribution Considerations for Burnup Credit Calculations, ORNL/TM-1999/246, National Technical Information Service, 2000.
10 Walid A. Metwally, Abdulrahman S. Alawad, The effect of eccentric loading in spent fuel pool criticality safety analyses, Ann. Nucl. Energy 114 (2018) 407-412.   DOI
11 EPRI, Industry Spent Fuel Storage Handbook, 1021048, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, 2010.
12 IAEA, Storage and Disposal of Spent Fuel and High Level Radioactive Waste, GC(50)/inf/3/att5, Vienna, Austria, 2006.
13 IAEA, Survey of Wet and Dry Spent Fuel Storage, IAEA-TECDOC-1100, Vienna, Austria, 1999.
14 KEPCO/KHNP, Chapter 9: Auxiliary Systems, TIER 2-APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP-Rev 0. KEPCO/KHNP, 2014.
15 IAEA, Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Specific Safety Guide, IAEA Safety Standards Series, ISSN, Vienna, Austria, 2012, 1020-1525X; no. SSG-15.
16 NRC, Criticality control of fuel within dry storage casks or transportation Packages in A Spent fuel pool, 71 FR 66648, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 2006.
17 Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light Water Reactor Power Plants, NEI, 2014, 12-16, Revision 1.
18 Holtec, Use of METAMICin Fuel Pool Applications, HI2022871/GENERIC A, 2002.
19 IAEA, Implementation of Burnup Credit in Spent Fuel Management Systems, IAEA-TECDOC-1013, Vienna, Austria, 1998.
20 L. Kopp, Guidance on the Regulatory Requirements for Criticality Analysis of Fuel Storage at Light-water Reactor Power Plants, NRC Memorandum from L. Kopp to T. Collins, August 19, 1998, 1998.
21 KEPCO/KHNP, Mechanical Analysis for New and Spent Fuel Storage Racks, APR1400-H-N-NR-14012-NP, Rev.0, KEPCO/KHNP, 2014.
22 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), SCALE: a comprehensive modeling and simulation suite for nuclear safety analysis and design, ORNL/TM-2005/39, version 6.1, Oak ridge, TN, Available from Radiation Safety Information Computational Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as CCC-785, 2011.