Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.08.007

Surrogate based model calibration for pressurized water reactor physics calculations  

Khuwaileh, Bassam A. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University)
Turinsky, Paul J. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.49, no.6, 2017 , pp. 1219-1225 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this work, a scalable algorithm for model calibration in nuclear engineering applications is presented and tested. The algorithm relies on the construction of surrogate models to replace the original model within the region of interest. These surrogate models can be constructed efficiently via reduced order modeling and subspace analysis. Once constructed, these surrogate models can be used to perform computationally expensive mathematical analyses. This work proposes a surrogate based model calibration algorithm. The proposed algorithm is used to calibrate various neutronics and thermal-hydraulics parameters. The virtual environment for reactor applications-core simulator (VERA-CS) is used to simulate a three-dimensional core depletion problem. The proposed algorithm is then used to construct a reduced order model (a surrogate) which is then used in a Bayesian approach to calibrate the neutronics and thermal-hydraulics parameters. The algorithm is tested and the benefits of data assimilation and calibration are highlighted in an uncertainty quantification study and requantification after the calibration process. Results showed that the proposed algorithm could help to reduce the uncertainty in key reactor attributes based on experimental and operational data.
Keywords
Light water reactors; Model calibration; Surrogate modeling;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 W.C. Proctor, Elements of High-order Predictive Model Calibration Algorithms with Applications to Large-scale Reactor Physics Systems, North Carolina State University, 2012.
2 J.M. Hite, H.S. Abdel-Khalik, R.C. Smith, M. Wentworth, E. Prudencio, B. Williams, Uncertainty Quantification and Data Assimilation (UQ/DA) Study on a VERA Core Simulator Component for CRUD Analysis. CASL-I-2013-0184-000, 2013.
3 R.C. Smith, Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, vol. 12, SIAM, 2013.
4 H. Haario, M. Laine, A. Mira, E. Saksman, DRAM: efficient adaptive MCMC, Stat. Comput. 16 (2006) 339-354.   DOI
5 H. Haario, E. Saksman, J. Tamminen, An adaptive Metropolis algorithm, Bernoulli 7 (2001) 223-242.   DOI
6 B.M. Adams, M.S. Ebeida, S. Michael, M.S. Eldred, J.D. Jakeman, L.P. Swiler, J.A. Stephens, D.M. Vigil, T.M. Wildey, W.J. Bohnhoff, K.R. Dalbey, J.P. Eddy, K.T. Hu, L.E. Bauman, P.D. Hough, DAKOTA, a Multilevel Parallel Objectoriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.1 User's Manual, Sandia National Laboratories, 2014. Tech. Rep. SAND2014-4633.
7 B.A.A. Khuwaileh, Scalable Methods for Uncertainty Quantification, Data Assimilation and Target Accuracy Assessment for Multi-Physics Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors, ProQuest, 2015.
8 A. Godfrey, VERA Core Physics Benchmark Progression Problem Specifications, Revision 4, CASL Technical Report: CASL-U-2012-0131-004, August 29, 2014.
9 N. Halko, P. Martinsson, J.A. Tropp, Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions, SIAM Review 53 (2011) 217-288.   DOI
10 B.A. Khuwaileh, R. Hooper, P.J. Turinsky, V.A. Mousseau, Uncertainty Quantification Analysis Using VERA-CS for a PWR Fuel Assembly with Depletion. CASL-I-2015-0328-000, 2015.