[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.08.010

Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Kovac, Michal (Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, CTU in Prague)

Publication Information

Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.48, no.1, 2016 , pp. 169-174 More about this Journal

Abstract

This article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculations. The second part is the business-economic evaluation of the selected reloading strategy, which can be done either by financial analysis or economic analysis. The financial analysis incorporates the perspectives of a company while the economic analysis can be used primarily by national economists or politicians. This methodology was applied to a case study that is focused on impacts of switching from a 12-month to an 18-month fuel cycle strategy for Water-Water Energetic Reactor (VVER)-1000 reactors.

Keywords

Core design; Cost-benefit analysis; Economics of nuclear fuel cycles; Fuel cycle strategy; 18-Month fuel cycle;

Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By KSCI : 1 (Citation Analysis)

Reference
Cited By KSCI

1	Idaho National Laboratory, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening-Final Report, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Falls, 2014. INL/EXT-14-31465.
2	European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy, Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy, Brussels, 2008.
3	Idaho National Laboratory, Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Falls, 2009. INL/EXT-09-15483.
4	World Bank, Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies, Operations, Evaluation Department, World Bank, Washington DC, 2005.
5	International Atomic Energy Agency, Costing of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.
6	International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Reactor Strategies: Adjusting to New Realities, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.
7	Y.S. Hwang, C.H. Kang, The development of a safety assessment approach and its implication on the advanced nuclear fuel cycle, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 42 (2010) 37-46. DOI
8	M. Bunn, S. Fetter, J. Holdren, B. van der Zwaan, The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2003.