Browse > Article

A Study on Etching of $UO_2$, Co, and Mo Surface with R.F. Plasma Using $CF_4\;and\;O_2$  

Kim Yong-Soo (Hanyang University)
Seo Yong-Dae (Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.35, no.6, 2003 , pp. 507-514 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently dry decontamination/surface-cleaning technology using plasma etching has been focused in the nuclear industry. In this study, the applicability of this new dry processing technique are experimentally investigated by examining the etching reaction of $UO_2$, Co, and Mo in r.f. plasma with the etchant gas of $CF_4/O_2$ mixture. $UO_2$ is chosen as a representing material for uranium and TRU (TRans-Uranic) compounds while metallic Co and Mo are selected because they are the principal contaminants in the used metallic nuclear components such as valves and pipes made of stainless steel or inconel. Results show that in all cases maximum etching rate is achieved when the mole fraction of $UO_2\;in\;CF_4/O_2$ mixture gas is $20\%$, regardless of temperature and r.f. power. In case of $UO_2$, the highest etching reaction rate is greater than 1000 monolayers/min. at $370^{\circ}C$ under 150 W r.f. power which is equivalent to $0.4{\mu}m/min$. As for Co, etching reaction begins to take place significantly when the temperature exceeds $350^{\circ}C$. Maximum etching rate achieved at $380^{\circ}C\;is\;0.06{\mu}m/min$. Mo etching reaction takes place vigorously even at relatively low temperature and the reaction rate increases drastically with increasing temperature. Highest etching rate at $380^{\circ}C\;is\;1.9{\mu}m/min$. According to OES (Optical Emission Spectroscopy) and AES (Auger Electron Spectroscopy) analysis, primary reaction seems to be a fluorination reaction, but carbonyl compound formation reaction may assist the dominant reaction, especially in case of Co and Mo. Through this basic study, the feasibility and the applicability of plasma decontamination technique are demonstrated.
Keywords
decontamination; radwaste; plasma processing;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. Keil, P. Boczar, and H.S. Park, Proc. Intern. Conf. Tech. Expo. on Future Nuclear Systems, Global '93, Seattle, Washington, USA (Sept. 12-17, 1993)733
2 M. Iwasaki, J. Nucl. Mater., 25 (1968) 216   DOI   ScienceOn
3 J.C. Batty and R.E. Stickney, J. Chem. Phys., 51 (1969) 4475   DOI
4 B. Weber and A. Cassuto, Surf. Sci., 39 (1973) 83   DOI   ScienceOn
5 A.J. Machiels and D.R. Olander, High Temp. Sci., 9 (1977) 3
6 T. Yahata and M. Iwasaki, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 26 (1964) 1863   DOI   ScienceOn
7 G. Vandenbussche, CEA-R 2859 (1966)
8 L.J. Anastasia and W.J. Mecham, I & EC Process Design Devel., 4 (1965) 338   DOI
9 A.A. Jonke, Atomic Energy Rev., 3 (1965) 3
10 W. J. Mecham, J.D. Gabor, and A.A. Jonke, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser. 60, 47 (1964) 76
11 J. C. Martz, D. W. Hess, and W. E. Anderson, J. Appl. Phys., 67 (1990) 3609   DOI
12 USAEC Report ANL-5924 (1958)
13 J. W. Lee, Y. D. Park, J. R. Childress, S. J. Pearton, F. Sharifi, and F. Ren, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998) 2585   DOI
14 Y. Kuo and S. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39 (2000) L188   DOI   ScienceOn
15 J. J. Barghusen, A. A. Jonke, N. M. Levitz, M. J. Steindler, and R. C. Vogel, Fluid-Bed Fluoride Volatility, Processing of Spent Fuel Reactor Materials, Progress in Nuclear Energy, Series III, Vol. 4, Process Chemistry, C. E. Stevenson, E. A. Mason, A. T. Gresky (eds.), Pergamon Press, (1970) 347
16 Y.S. Kim, J.Y. Min, K.K. Bae, and M.S. Yang, J. Nuclear Mater., 270 (1999) 253   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Y. Kim, J. Min, K. Bae, M. Yang, J. Lee, and H. Park, Proc. Intern. Conf. On Future Muclear Systems, Global '97, Yokohama, Japan (Oct. 5-10, 1997)1148
18 Y. Igarashi, T. Yamanobe, and T. Ito, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995) L36   DOI
19 M.S. Yang, Y.W. Lee, K.K. Bae, and S.H. Na, Proc. Intern. Conf. Tech. Expo. on Future Nuclear Systems, Global '93, Seattle, Washington, USA (Sept. 12-17, 1993) 740