Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2020.37.4.229

Validation of KREAM Based on In-Situ Measurements of Aviation Radiation in Commercial Flights  

Hwang, Junga (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Kwak, Jaeyoung (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Jo, Gyeongbok (Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungnam National University)
Nam, Uk-won (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences / v.37, no.4, 2020 , pp. 229-236 More about this Journal
Abstract
There has been increasing necessity of more precise prediction and measurements of aviation radiation in Korea. For our air crew and passengers' radiation safety, we develop our own radiation prediction model of KREAM. In this paper, we validate the KREAM model based on comparison with Liulin observations. During early three months of this year, we perform total 25 experiments to measure aviation radiation exposure using Liulin-6K in commercial flights. We found that KREAM's result is very well consistent with Liulin observation in general. NAIRAS shows mostly higher results than Liulin observation, while CARI-6M shows generally lower results than the observations. The percent error of KREAM compared with Liulin observation is 10.95%. In contrast, the error for NAIRAS is 43.38% and 22.03% for CARI-6M. We found that the increase of the altitude might cause sudden increase in radiation exposure, especially for the polar route. As more comprehensive and complete analysis is required to validate KREAM's reliability to use for the public service, we plan to expand these radiation measurements with Liulin and Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter (TEPC) in the near future.
Keywords
space radiation; KREAM; Liulin;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahn HB, Kim KW, Choi YC, A study on the reduction of cosmic radiation exposure by flight crew, J. Korean Soc. Aviat. Aeronaut. 28, 1-6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2020.28.1.001   DOI
2 Dachev TP, Semkova JV, Tomov BT, Matviichuk YN, Dimitrov PG, et al., Overview of the Liulin type instruments for space radiation measurement and their scientific results, Life Sci. Space Res. 4, 92-114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2015.01.005   DOI
3 Green AR, Bennett LGI, Lewis BJ, Kitching F, McCall MJ, et al., An empirical approach to the measurement of the cosmic radiation field at jet aircraft altitudes, Adv. Space Res. 36, 1618-1626 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.061   DOI
4 Hwang J, Dokgo K, Choi E, Park JS, Kim KC, et al., Modeling of space radiation exposure estimation program for pilots, crew and passengers on commercial flights, J. Astron. Space Sci. 31, 25-31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.1.25   DOI
5 Hwang J, Lee J, Cho KS, Choi HS, Rho S, et al., Space radiation measurement on the polar route onboard the Korean commercial flights, J. Astron. Space Sci. 27, 43-54 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2010.27.1.043   DOI
6 ICRU, Reference data for the validation of doses from cosmicradiation exposure of aircraft crew, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, ICRU Rep. 84 (2010).
7 Irvine EA, Shine KP, Stringer MA, What are the implications of climate change for trans-Atlantic aircraft routing and flight time?, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 47, 44-53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.014   DOI
8 Kubancak J, Ambrozova I, Ploc O, Pachnerova Brabcova K, Stepan V, et al., Measurement of dose equivalent distribution onboard commercial jet aircraft, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetr. 162, 215-219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct331   DOI
9 Malimban J, Nam UW, Pyo J, Youn S, Ye SJ, Characterization of a new tissue equivalent proportional counter for dosimetry of neutron and photon fields: comparison of measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 17NT02 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2f1f   DOI
10 Mertens CJ, Kress BT, Wiltberger M, Blattnig SR, Slaba TS, et al., Geomagnetic influence on aircraft radiation exposure during a solar energetic particle event in October 2003, Space Weather. 8, S03006 (2010). http://doi:10.1029/2009SW000487   DOI
11 Spurny F, Response of a Si-diode-based device to fast neutrons, Radiat. Meas. 39, 219-223 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.05.006   DOI
12 Mertens CJ, Meier MM, Brown S, Norman RB, Xu X, NAIRAS aircraft radiation model development, dose climatology, and initial validation, Space Weather. 11, 603-635 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20100   DOI
13 O'Brien K, Smart DF, Shea MA, Felsberger E, Schrewe U, et al., World-wide radiation dosage calculations for air crew members, Adv. Space Res. 31, 835-840 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00882-7   DOI
14 Ploc O, Pachnerova Brabcova K, Spurny F, Malusek A, Dachev T, Use of energy deposition spectrometer Liulin for individual monitoring of aircrew, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetr. 144, 611-614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq505   DOI
15 Wilson JW, Mertens CJ, Goldhagen P, Friedberg W, De Angelis G, et al., Atmospheric ionizing radiation and human exposure, NASA Technical Publication, NASA/TP-2005-213935 (2005).