Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2013.30.1.017

Performance Analysis of Generating Function Approach for Optimal Reconfiguration of Formation Flying  

Lee, Kwangwon (Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University)
Park, Chandeok (Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University)
Park, Sang-Young (Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences / v.30, no.1, 2013 , pp. 17-24 More about this Journal
Abstract
The use of generating functions for solving optimal rendezvous problems has an advantage in the sense that it does not require one to guess and iterate the initial costate. This paper presents how to apply generating functions to analyze spacecraft optimal reconfiguration between projected circular orbits. The series-based solution obtained by using generating functions demonstrates excellent convergence and approximation to the nonlinear reference solution obtained from a numerical shooting method. These favorable properties are expected to hold for analyzing optimal formation reconfiguration under perturbations and non-circular reference orbits.
Keywords
formation reconfiguration; generating function; optimal control;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Palmer P, Optimal Relocation of Satellites Flying in Near-Circular-Orbit Formations, JGCD, 29, 519-526 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.14310   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Park C, Guibout VM, Scheeres DJ, Solving Optimal Continuous Thrust Rendezvous Problems with Generating Functions, JGCD, 29, 321-331 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.14580   DOI
3 Yoo SM, Park SY, Choi KH, A Fuel Balancing Method for Reconfiguration of Satellite Formation Flying, International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems 2007, Seoul, Korea, 17-20 Oct 2007.
4 Carter TE, Pardis CJ, Optimal Power-Limited Rendezvous with Upper and Lower Bounds on Thrust, JGCD, 19, 1124-1133 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.21754   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cho HC, Park SY, Analytic Solution for Fuel-Optimal Reconfiguration in Relative Motion, JOTA, 141, 495-521 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-008-9482-3   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Greenwood DT, Classical Dynamics (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1977), 187-271.
7 Guibout VM, Scheeres DJ, Solving Relative Two-Point Boundary Value Problems: Spacecraft Formation Flight Transfers Application, JGCD, 27, 693-704 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.11164   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Guibout VM, Scheeres DJ, Spacecraft Formation Dynamics and Design, JGCD, 29, 121-133 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.13002   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kirk DE, Optimal Control Theory (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1970), 184-325.
10 Lee S, Park SY, Approximate Analytical Solutions to Optimal Reconfiguration Problems in Perturbed Satellite Relative Motion, JGCD, 34, 1097-1111 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.52283   DOI   ScienceOn