Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2012.29.3.259

Estimation of Polar Cap Potential and the Role of PC Index  

Moon, Ga-Hee (Daegu Science High School)
Publication Information
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences / v.29, no.3, 2012 , pp. 259-267 More about this Journal
Abstract
Polar cap potential has long been considered as an indicator for the amount of energy flowing in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Thus, the estimation of polar cap potential is important to understand the physical process of the magnetosphere. To estimate the polar cap potential in the Northern Hemisphere, merging electric field by Kan & Lee (1979) is adopted. Relationships between the PC index and calculated merging electric field ($E^*$) are examined during full-time and storm-time periods separately. For this purpose Dst, AL, and PC indices and solar wind data are utilized during the period from 1996-2003. From this linear relationship, polar cap potential (${\Phi}^*$) is estimated using the formula by Doyle & Burke (1983). The values are represented as $58.1{\pm}26.9$ kV for the full-time period and $123.7{\pm}84.1$ kV for a storm-time period separately. Considering that the average value of polar cap potential of Doyle & Burke (1983) is about 47 kV during moderately quiet intervals with the S3-2 measurements, these results are similar to such. The monthly averaged variation of Dst, AL, and PC indices are then compared. The Dst and AL indices show distinct characteristics with peaks during equinoctial season whereas the average PC index according to the month shows higher values in autumn than in spring. The monthly variations of the linear correlation coefficients between solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices are also examined. The PC-AL linear correlation coefficient is highest, being 0.82 with peaks during the equinoctial season. As with the AL index, the PC index may also prove useful for predicting the intensity of an auroral substorm. Generally, the linear correlation coefficients are shown low in summer due to conductance differences and other factors. To assess the role of the PC index during the recovery phase of a storm, the relation between the cumulative PC index and the duration is examined. Although the correlation coefficient lowers with the storm size, it is clear that the average correlation coefficient is high. There is a tendency that duration of the recovery phase is longer as the PC index increases.
Keywords
PC index; polar cap potential; merging electric field; Dst index; AL index;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Troshichev OA, Andrezen VG, The relationship between interplanetary quantities and magnetic activity in the southern polar cap, P&SS 33, 415-419 (1985). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(85)90086-8   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Troshichev OA, Andrezen VG, Vennerstrom S, Friis- Christensen E, Magnetic activity in the polar cap--a new index, P&SS, 36, 1095-1102 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(88)90063-3
3 Troshichev OA, Kuznetsov BM, Dmitrieva NP, Polar cap magnetic activity as a signature of substorm development, P&SS, 27, 217-221 (1979). http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0032-0633(79)90063-1   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Troshichev OA, Lukianova RY, Relation of PC index to the solar wind parameters and substorm activity in time of magnetic storms, JASTP, 64, 585-591 (2002). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00016-0
5 Troshichev OA, Lukianova RY, Papitashvili VO, Rich FJ, Rasmussen O, Polar cap index (PC) as a proxy for ionospheric electric field in the near-pole region, GeoRL, 27, 3809-3812(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000GL003756
6 Vennerstrom S, Friis-Christensen E, Troshichev OA, Andresen VG, Comparison between the polar cap index PC and the auroralelectrojetindicies AE, AL, and AU, JGR, 96, 101-113 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/90JA01975   DOI
7 Doyle MA, Burke WJ, S3-2 Measurements of the polar cap potential, JGR, 88, 9125-9133 (1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA088iA11p09125   DOI
8 Kan JR, Lee LC, Energy coupling function and solar windmagnetosphere dynamo, GeoRL, 6, 577-580 (1979). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL006i007p00577
9 Lyatskaya S, Lyatsky W, Khazanov GV, Relationship between substorm activity and magnetic disturbances in two polar caps, GeoRL, 35, L20104 (2008). http://dx.doi. org/10.1029/2008GL035187
10 McCreadie H, Menvielle M, The PC index: review of methods, AnGeo, 28, 1887-1903 (2010). http://dx.doi. org/10.5194/angeo-28-1887-2010
11 Nagatsuma T, Conductivity dependence of cross-polar potential saturation, JGR, 109, A04210 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010286   DOI
12 Perreault P, Akasofu S-I, A study of geomagnetic storms, GeoJ, 54, 547-573 (1978). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-246X.1978.tb05494.x
13 Ridley AJ, Kihn EA, Polar cap index comparisons with AMIE cross polar cap potential, electric field, and polar cap area, GeoRL, 31, L07801 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019113
14 Russell CT, McPherron RL, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, JGR, 78, 92-108 (1973). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA078i001p00092   DOI
15 Takalo J, Timonen J, On the relation of the AE and PC indices, JGR, 103, 29393-29398 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JA02390   DOI
16 Troshichev O, Hayakawa H, Matsuoka A, Mukai T, Tsuruda K, Cross polar cap diameter and voltage as a function of PC index and interplanetary quantities, JGR, 101, 13429-13436 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JA03672   DOI
17 Cliver EW, Kamide Y, Ling AG, Mountains versus valleys: semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, 105, 2413- 2424 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900439   DOI
18 Troshichev O, Janzhura A, Relationship between the PC and AL indices during repetitive bay-like magnetic disturbances in the auroral zone, JASTP, 71, 1340-1352 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.05.017
19 Borovsky JE, Denton MH, Differences between CME-driven storms and CIR-driven storms, JGR, 111, 11447-11463 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011447
20 Chun FK, Knipp DJ, McHarg MG, Lacey JR, Lu G, et al., Joule heating patterns as a function of polar cap index, 107, 1119-1127(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ 2001JA000246   DOI