Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2011.28.2.123

Variation of Magnetic Field (By, Bz) Polarity and Statistical Analysis of Solar Wind Parameters during the Magnetic Storm Period  

Moon, Ga-Hee (Daegu Science High School)
Publication Information
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences / v.28, no.2, 2011 , pp. 123-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is generally believed that the occurrence of a magnetic storm depends upon the solar wind conditions, particularly the southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) component. To understand the relationship between solar wind parameters and magnetic storms, variations in magnetic field polarity and solar wind parameters during magnetic storms are examined. A total of 156 storms during the period of 1997~2003 are used. According to the interplanetary driver, magnetic storms are divided into three types, which are coronal mass ejection (CME)-driven storms, co-rotating interaction region (CIR)-driven storms, and complicated type storms. Complicated types were not included in this study. For this purpose, the manner in which the direction change of IMF $B_y$ and $B_z$ components (in geocentric solar magnetospheric coordinate system coordinate) during the main phase is related with the development of the storm is examined. The time-integrated solar wind parameters are compared with the time-integrated disturbance storm time (Dst) index during the main phase of each magnetic storm. The time lag with the storm size is also investigated. Some results are worth noting: CME-driven storms, under steady conditions of $B_z$ < 0, represent more than half of the storms in number. That is, it is found that the average number of storms for negative sign of IMF $B_z$ (T1~T4) is high, at 56.4%, 53.0%, and 63.7% in each storm category, respectively. However, for the CIR-driven storms, the percentage of moderate storms is only 29.2%, while the number of intense storms is more than half (60.0%) under the $B_z$ < 0 condition. It is found that the correlation is highest between the time-integrated IMF $B_z$ and the time-integrated Dst index for the CME-driven storms. On the other hand, for the CIR-driven storms, a high correlation is found, with the correlation coefficient being 0.93, between time-integrated Dst index and time-integrated solar wind speed, while a low correlation, 0.51, is found between timeintegrated $B_z$ and time-integrated Dst index. The relationship between storm size and time lag in terms of hours from $B_z$ minimum to Dst minimum values is investigated. For the CME-driven storms, time lag of 26% of moderate storms is one hour, whereas time lag of 33% of moderate storms is two hours for the CIR-driven storms. The average values of solar wind parameters for the CME and CIR-driven storms are also examined. The average values of ${\mid}Dst_{min}{\mid}$ and ${\mid}B_{zmin}{\mid}$ for the CME-driven storms are higher than those of CIR-driven storms, while the average value of temperature is lower.
Keywords
disturbance storm time index; magnetic storms; solar wind parameters;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wu C-C, Lepping RP, Solar cycle effect on geomagnetic storms caused by interplanetary magnetic clouds, AnGeo, 24, 3383-3389 (2006). doi: 10.5194/angeo-24-3383-2006   DOI
2 Borovsky JE, Denton MH, Differences between CME-driven storms and CIR-driven storms, JGR, 111, 11447-11463 (2006). doi: 10.1029/2005JA011447   DOI
3 Burlaga L, Sittler E, Mariani F, Schwenn R, Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations, JGR, 86, 6673-6684 (1981). doi: 10.1029/JA086iA11p08893   DOI
4 Burton RK, McPherron RL, Russell CT, An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst, JGR, 80, 4204-4214 (1975). doi: 10.1029/JA080i031p04204   DOI
5 Choi C-R, Kim K-C, Lee D-Y, Kim J-H, Lee E, Statistical characteristics of solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during geomagnetic storms, JASS, 25, 113-128 (2008). doi: 10.5140/JASS.2008.25.2.113   DOI
6 Lopez RE, Wiltberger M, Hernandez S, Lyon JG, Solar wind density control of energy transfer to the magnetosphere, GeoRL, 31, 8804-8807 (2004). doi: 10.1029/2003GL018780   DOI
7 Du AM, Tsurutani BT, Sun W, Anomalous geomagnetic storm of 21-22 January 2005: a storm main phase during northward IMFs, JGR, 113, 13284-13292 (2008). doi: 10.1029/2008JA013284   DOI
8 Echer E, Alves MV, Gonzalez WD, A statistical study of magnetic cloud parameters and geoeffectiveness, JASTP, 67, 839-852 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.02.010   DOI
9 Echer E, Gonzalez WD, Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez ALC, Interplanetary conditions causing geomagnetic storms ($Dst\;{\leq}\;-100\;nT$) during solar cycle 23 (1996-2006), JGR, 113, 12744-12759 (2008). doi: 10.1029/2007JA012744   DOI
10 Oh SY, Yi Y, Kim YH, Solar cycle variation of the interplanetary forward shock drivers observed at 1 AU, SoPh, 245, 391-410 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s11207-007-9042-2   DOI
11 Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Tang F, Akasofu SI, Smith EJ, Origin of interplanetary southward magnetic fields responsible for major magnetic storms near solar maximum (1978‐1979), JGR, 93, 8519-8531 (1988). doi: 10.1029/JA093iA08p08519   DOI
12 Weigel RS, Solar wind density influence on geomagnetic storm intensity, JGR, 115, 15062-15072 (2010). doi: 10.1029/2009JA015062   DOI