Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.1.149

A Comparison Analysis of Scientific Communication Skills Between Gifted Students and General Students  

Jeon, SeongSoo (Hoewon Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.24, no.1, 2014 , pp. 149-164 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare scientific communication skills between the gifted students and the general students. Subjects were 60 gifted students of the Institute for The Gifted Education and 69 general elementary school students. Scientific communication skills were classified into two types - scientific explanation and opinion, and four forms - letter, number, table, and figure. The results of this study were as follows: Gifted students' Scientific Communication Skills is better than ordinary students'. Detailed findings are following. Independent sample t-test performed on type and form of Scientific Communication Skills used by students showed significant difference between two groups. This result gave important information about tendency of each group.
Keywords
Scientific communication skill; Gifted students; SCST;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 홍정림 (2001). 의사결정 활동을 중심으로 한 STS(과학-기술-사회) 수업 프로그램이 학생들의 문제해결능력에 미치는 효과. 한국생물교육학회지, 29(4), 375-381.
2 허형, 이군현 (1996). 대학의 과학 영재 교육을 위한 교수방법. 한국영재 학회 연구보고서.
3 Borland, J. H. (1997). The Construct of Giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3&4), 6-20.   DOI
4 Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Studies and Science Education, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodical, Inc.
5 Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1986). Scientists and journalists: Reporting Science as News. New York: The free press.
6 Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8, 123-126.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Harpole, S. H. (1987). The relationship of gender and learning style to achievement and laboratory skills in secondary school chemistry students. Mid-South Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
8 Holbrook, J., & Tannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347-1362.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Koelsche, C. (1965). Scientific literacy as related to the media of mass communication. School Science and Mathematics, 83, 647-650.
10 Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examming the literacy component of science literacy. International journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 박병태, 고민석, 김오범 (2012). 초등학교 과학영재학생과 수학영재학생의 과학에 대한 태도 및 과학학습동기 차이. 영재교육연구, 22(4), 917-928.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
12 소금현, 김정민, 심규철 (2009). 과학 영재와 일반 학생의 학습 양식에 관한 비교 연구. 국제과학영재학회지, 3(2), 119-124.
13 신지은, 한기순, 정현철, 박병건, 최승언 (2002). 과학 영재 학생과 일반 학생은 창의성에서 어떻게 다른가? 서울대학교 과학영재교육센터 학생들을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 158-175.   과학기술학회마을
14 이현자, 문경원, 김영수 (2007). 고등학생의 의사결정 유형 조사. 한국생물교육학회지, 35(2), 328-336.
15 장신호 (2004). 과학 대화를 이용하는 수업에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 및 대화 능력의 변화 . 발전에 대한 사례 연구. 한국초등교육학회지, 17(1), 79-99.
16 전성수 (2013). 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력 검사도구 개발. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교.
17 조은부, 백성혜 (2006). 초등학교 영재학급 학생들과 일반 학생의 인지적 특성 비교 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 307-316.
18 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science-A Process Approach(SAPA II). Delta Education.
19 한유화 (2012). 과학적 의사소통능력을 기르기 위한 교실탐구모델 개발. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교.
20 Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in the school science. International Journal of science education, 41(10), 994-1020.
21 Renzulli, J. S. (1998). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness, In S. M., Baum, S. M., Reis, & L. R., Maxfield (eds), Nurturing the Gifts and Talents of primary Grade Students. Mansfielld Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
22 Semple, E. E. (1982). Learning style. A review of literature, Eric document: ED 222477.