Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.639

An Basic Study on the Curriculum Evaluation of Gifted Education in Visual Art  

Lee, Kyung-Jin (KRIGA)
Kim, Sun-Ah (Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.22, no.3, 2012 , pp. 639-662 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop the evaluation model of gifted curriculum in visual art. For this purpose, first, it discusses about what kinds of issues raised about gifted education in visual art. Second, it critically reviews the evaluation models of gifted curriculum, and investigates the suitable model for developing curriculum evaluation model of gifted in visual art. Third, it suggests the appropriate perspective and evaluation model of gifted curriculum in visual art. Along with the change in the concept of creativity, recent studies on gifted education in visual art concentrate that gifted learners who have the potential find their own way of creating art. Also they emphasize the contextual implementation which recognizes the significance of interaction among field, domain and individual. Based of these inquiry, existing evaluation models of gifted curriculum have limitations in suitability as a evaluation model of gifted curriculum in visual art. This study suggests that the curriculum evaluation of visual art gifted programs should be approached from the decision-making perspective. Also it develops the conceptual framework and the evaluation model of gifted curriculum in visual art based on the CIPP model, which is the representative model of decision-making approach. It concludes with its implications and the discussion about the role of evaluators.
Keywords
Gifted curriculum in visual art; Program evaluation; CIPP model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2008). 미술영재교육: 이론과 실제. [홍소영 역]. 서울: 미진사. (원본출간년도: 2004).
2 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). 창의성의 즐거움 [노혜숙 역], 서울: 북로드. (원본출간년도: 1996).
3 Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4 Eisner, E. W. (1998). 새로운 눈으로 보는 미술교육. [서울교육대학교 미술교육연구회 역]. 서울: 예경. (원본출간년도: 1972).
5 Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6 Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Wang Yani: Stylistic development of a Chinese painting prodigy. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3), 281-293.   DOI
7 Provus, M. M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
8 Renzuilli, J, S., & Ward, V. S. (1969). Diagnostic and evaluative scales for differntial education for gifted. Storrs, CT: Unversity of Connecticut, Department of Educational Psychology.
9 Simonton, D. (1997). Genius and creativity: Selected papers. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
10 Stufflebeam, D. L. (2005). CIPP model (context, input, process, product). In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 60-65). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
11 Winner, E. (1997). Giftedness vs. creativity in the visual arts. Poetics, 24(6), 349-377.   DOI
12 Zhensun, Z., & Low, A. (1991). A young painter: The life and paintings of Wang ani-China's extraordinary young artist. New York: Scholastic Hardcover.
13 권준범 (2008). 초등미술영재교육에 대비한 현황 분석 연구. 미술교육연구논총, 24, 27-48.
14 김정희 (2004). 미술영재 교육을 위한 예술 통한 교육과정에 대한 연구. 미술교육논총, 18(2), 65-86.
15 김정희 (2007). 미술영재 교육과정 모형에 관한 연구. 미술교육논총, 21(2), 61-82.
16 김춘미, 한수연, 이미경, 전동호, 신기현, 조주현, 김정환 (2006). 예술영재교육 발전 방안 연구. 서울: 한국예술영재교육연구원.
17 김춘일 (2004). 예술영재에 대한 인식의 문제와 개선. 조형교육, 24, 31-53.
18 서혜애, 조석희, 이은아, 한석실, 윤초희 (2003). 영재교육기관 평가체제 개발연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
19 백경미 (2012). 한국 미술영재교육 현장의 요구. 기초조형학연구, 13(3), 153-161.
20 서제희 (2003). 미술 영재의 발달과정 이해를 통한 교육적 가능성. 미술교육논총, 16, 47-68.
21 송인섭, 문은식, 하주현, 한수연, 성은현 (2010). 과학영재를 위한 인문사회와 예술의 융합형 영재교육 프로그램 개발. 영재와 영재교육, 9(3), 117-138.
22 이경진 (2012). 예술영재 교육과정 평가를 위한 기초연구: 예술영재 교육과정 평가모형 개발. 교육과정평가, 15(2), 217-240.
23 이용애 (2002). 시각예술 영재성 개념 모델의 탐색. 초등교육학연구, 9(1), 21-36.
24 최인수 (1998). 창의적 성취와 관련된 제 요인들: 창의적 연구의 최근 모델인 체계모델을 중심으로. 미래유아교육학회지, 5(2), 133-166.
25 최인수 (2000). 창의성을 이해하기 위한 체계모델, 생활과학, 3(1), 441-464.
26 한수연 (2006). 예술영재교육과정 연구. 서울: 한국예술영재교육연구원.
27 한수연, 박우룡 (2009). 예술영재교육 프로그램 개발 사례 연구: 시각예술에서의 기초예술성을 중심으로. 영재와 영재교육, 8(2), 149-170.
28 Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, M. (2007). 삶을 위한 미술교육. [김정희, 최정임, 신승렬 역]. 서울:예경. (원본출간년도: 2004).
29 Borland, M. A. (2003). Evaluating gifted programs: a broader perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education (pp. 293-307). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
30 Callahan, C. M. (2004). Asking the right question: The central issue in evaluation programs for the gifted and talented. In C. M. Callahan (Eds.). Program evaluation in gifted education (pp. 1-11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
31 Carter, K. R., & Hamilton, W. (1985). Formative evaluation of gifted programs: A process and model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(1), 5-11.   DOI