Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.333

An Analytical Study on Studies of Creativity Education in Korea: Focusing on Categories and Levels of Creativity  

Cho, Youn-Soon (Ewha Womans University)
Jeong, Ji-Eun (Ewha elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.22, no.2, 2012 , pp. 333-352 More about this Journal
Abstract
Creativity has been suggested as a prime educational objective by national curriculum of Korea and research on creativity education has been increased since 2000s. How the researcher conceptualizes and approaches creativity affects the research. The purpose of this study is to explore directions of creativity research in education by analyzing its approach based on its categories and levels of creativity. The results of the study shows the following: (1)studies with a definition of creativity are more than without it but the former has been decreasing and the latter increasing little by little. (2)Studies which focus on person, cognitive or emotional characteristics, are the most. And process, environment, and product follow. (3)Regarding the levels of creativity, most was done on little-c creativity level, on the other hand, very limited studies conceptualized the creativity in educational context. Studies having an interest in mini-c creativity level were hardly found.
Keywords
Creativity; Creativity education; Research on creativity education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Propects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2 Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.) (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: APA.
3 Taylor, I. A. (1975). An emerging view of creative actions. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 297-325). Chicago: Aldine.
4 Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test on creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
5 Urban, K. K. (1990). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal for High Ability, 1, 99-113.
6 Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
7 Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hobokin, NJ: Wiley.
8 Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.   DOI
9 Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128-134.   DOI
10 Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
11 Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: "Afterview" for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300-326.   DOI
12 Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1995). The psychoeconomic view of creative work in groups and organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4, 232-241.   DOI
13 Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21-30). Washington, DC: APA.
14 Runco, M. A. (2010). Educational based on parsimonious theory of creativity. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 235-251). New York: Cambridge university press.
15 Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity and development (pp. 91-138). UK: Oxford university press.
16 Simonton, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829-804.   DOI
17 Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for creativity. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 394-414). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18 Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: Health.
19 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perpective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20 Dababneha, K., Ihmeideha, F. M., & Al-Omarib, A. A. (2010). Promoting kindergarten children's creativity in the classroom environment in Jordan. Early Child Development and Care, 180(9), 1165-1184.   DOI
21 Fairweather, B., & Cramon, B. (2010). Infusing creative and critical thinking into the curriculum together. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 113-141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22 Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Roning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 202-219). New York: Plenum.
24 Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2006). Creativity and reason in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25 Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20-47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27 Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 265-278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28 Necka, E. (2001). Psychology of creativity. Gdansk: GWP.
29 팽영일 (2010). 창의성의 개념적 기준 비교. 비교교육연구, 20(4), 277-298.
30 Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31 하주현 (2007). 창의적 인물의 특성. 창의력교육연구, 7(2), 51-68.
32 홍소영, 이종승 (2009). 유아 창의성 개발 프로그램의 효과에 관한 메타분석. 열린유아교육연구, 14(2), 359-381.
33 황정숙 (2007). 유아 창의성 교육에 관한 연구 동향 분석. 창의력교육연구, 7(2), 19-35.
34 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.   DOI
35 Baldwin, A. Y. (2010). Creativity: A look outside the box in classrooms. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 73-87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36 Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Talent development in an age of situated approaches to learning and thinking. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165-182.   DOI
37 Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a Broader conception of creativity: A case of for "mini-c"creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 73-79.
38 Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products - three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333-346.   DOI
39 Cho, Y., Chung, H. Y., Choi, K., Suh, Y., & Seo, C. (2011). The Creativity of Korean Leaders and its Implications for Creativity Education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 235-257.   DOI
40 Craft, A. (2008). Tensions in creativity and Education. In G. Claxton, A. Craft & H. Gardner (Eds.), Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship: Exploring the role of education (pp. 16-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41 Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42 교육과학기술부 (2009). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2009-41호. 서울: 교육과학기술부.
43 교육인적자원부 (2007). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론. 교육과학기술부고시 제 2007-79호. 서울: 교육인적자원부.
44 김정섭 (2008). 한국 창의성 연구의 동향과 쟁점. 교육심리연구, 22(2), 939-960.
45 김효정 (2008). 음악적 창의성 신장을 위한 초등학교 음악 수업의 개선 방안 -초등학교 3학년을 중심으로-. 종합예술과 음악학회지, 2(1), 27-52.
46 박병기, 강현숙 (2007). 한국 창의성 연구의 조망. 교육심리연구, 21(1), 233-264.
47 성은현, 한순미, 하주현, 이정규, 류형선, 한윤영, 박병기 (2008b). 한국적 창의성과 창의적 환경에 대한 대학생들의 암묵적 이론. 한국심리학회지, 사회문제, 14(1), 367-390.
48 성태제, 시기자 (2006). 연구방법론. 서울: 학지사.
49 이쌍재, 조시연 (2007). 창의성 계발을 위한 '조형요소'의 지도 방법연구. 미술교육연구논총, 21, 177-200.
50 이영만 (2001). 교과교육을 통한 창의성 교육의 접근 방안 탐색. 초등교육연구, 14(2), 5-26.
51 이종희, 김기연 (2008). 창의적 생산력의 하위 요소 탐색 및 수학영재의 창의적 문제해결 모델 개발. 학교수학, 10(4), 583-601.
52 이채호, 최인수 (2009). 유아 창의성에 관한 연구동향 분석. 아동학회지, 30(5), 1-8.
53 이화자 (2002). 창의성 연구 현황 및 향후연구방향에 대한 고찰. 인문사회과학연구, 9, 81-104.
54 이희주 (2007). 초등학생을 위한 창의성 증진 프로그램 개발과 효과 분석. 초등교육연구, 20(2), 139-161.
55 최은영, 김정원 (2008). 유아 창의성 프로그램 관련 연구 분석. 육아지원연구, 3(2), 51-74.
56 임선하 (2007). 창의성 교육: 반성적 접근. 창조교육논총, 9, 55-86.
57 조연순, 성진숙, 이혜주 (2008). 창의성 교육: 창의적 문제해결력 계발과 교육방법. 서울: 이화여자대학교출판부.
58 천정미, 박영근 (2002). John Dewey의 지성 개념과 창의성 교육. 교육철학, 20, 189-204.
59 최인수 (2011). 창의성의 발견. 서울: 쌤앤파커스.
60 Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 1-5.