Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.243

Research and Education (R&E) Programs in the Science High Schools and Gifted High Schools: Based on the Interview Results with the R&E Coordinators  

Jung, Hyun-Chul (KAIST)
Ryu, Chun-Ryol (KAIST)
Chae, Yoo-Jung (KAIST)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.22, no.2, 2012 , pp. 243-264 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of R&E programs in gifted high schools/science high schools and to provide suggestions for the better program. The sample included 21 R&E coordinators in the gifted high schools and science high schools. They filled out the survey, asking about the R&E program; then, the researchers interviewed the coordinators based on the answers of the survey. The results are as follows: 1) The R&E guidelines and related materials were not enough to use. 2) At the planning step, students and the mentors received were provided a little information, such as ethical issues, students' information, the roles of mentors/ students, mentor's research interest areas and products, etc. 3) At the research step, 80% of the schools had the monitoring process but the details were not written and saved. 4) At the evaluation step, the rubric of the product evaluation existed; the rubric of performance process were established by half of the schools. 5) At the closing step, 100% of the schools had the final product materials; the results of the evaluation and the information of the mentors were saved by 2/3 and 1/3 of the schools, respectively. Discussions and suggestions were included for the better R&E programs.
Keywords
Research and Education (R&E); R&E coordinators; Gifted high schools; Science high schools;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
2 Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 461-494). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
3 Haeger, W. W., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Developing a mentor program. East Aurora, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.
4 O'Neill, D. K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate "little scientists?" examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234-266.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Siegle, D. (2005). Developing mentorship programs for gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
6 Wiley, T. T. (2009). Elements of effective practice for mentoring (3rd Edition). Alecandria, Va: MetLife Foundation (http://www.mentoring.org/downloads/mentoring_1222.pdf).
7 Wilson, J. E., & Elman, N. (1990). Organizational benefits of mentoring. Academy of Management Executive, 4(4), 88-94.
8 방승진, 최중오 (2010). 수학 학문적 창의성 신장을 위한 멘토십 프로그램 모형 개발. 영재교육연구, 20(1), 205-229.
9 김경대, 심재영 (2008). R&E 프로그램을 체험한 과학영재들의 사사교육 프로그램 효과에 대한 인식: KAIST 신입생을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(4), 282-290.
10 박종원 (2009). 과학영재를 위한 사사교육 준비와 유형에 대한 논의. 과학영재교육, 1(3), 1-19.
11 백순근 (1999). 수행평가의 이론적 기초. 초등교과교육연구, 3, 26-49.
12 이광형, 편은진, 김영주, 한상준 (2007). 과학영재를 위한 e-mentoring 활성화방안. KAIST 과학영재교육연구원 연구보고서 2007-19.
13 정명화, 신경숙 (2004). 프로젝트 수업이 대학생의 창의적 사고, 창의적 성향 및 문제해결 능력 향상에 미치는 효과. 교육심리연구, 18(3), 287-301.
14 최호성, 강호감, 서혜애, 박일영, 이혁우, 이진희, 박경희, 박지현 (2003). 연구와 교육(R&E) 프로그램을 통한 과학영재의 창의성 신장 방안에 관한 연구. 한국과학재단 정책연구보고서 2002-5092.
15 편은진, 이선길, 오혜미, 이범진 (2008). 일반 과학고와 영재고등학교 R&E 실태 비교를 통한 지원 방안 특성화 연구. KAIST과학영재교육연구원 연구보고서 2008-40.
16 Berger, S. L. (1990). Mentor relationships and gifted learners (Digest #E486). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED321491).