Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.2.427

Difference on Identification of Gifted Students by Level of Perception of Teacher's Professionalism in Gifted Education  

Ko, Min-Seok (Korea National University of Education)
Park, Byoung-Tai (Seoul Daechi Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.21, no.2, 2011 , pp. 427-447 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research looked into the recognitions of a teacher's discernment & recommendations of gifted elementary students targeting 184 elementary school teachers in Seoul district and compared and contrasted their awareness in order to confirm whether there existed a difference in the discernment of gifted elementary students according to their awareness level of professionalism in gifted and talented education. The research results are as follows: There appeared a significant difference in teachers' recognitions level of professionalism in gifted education according to their experience relevant to a gifted elementary student. The teachers, in the process of observations & nominations of gifted elementary students, pointed out creativity, learning motive and attitude as the highest judging standard and also regard such elements as discerning criteria of gifted students. In the process of observations & nominations of gifted elementary students, it was found that teachers' recognitions of importance of discerning criteria of gifted elementary students in relation to parents or fellow teachers' recommendations appeared relatively lower than their recognitions of importance in relation to learning ability, creativity, learning motive and attitude. The research results showed that a group of teachers, who have a high recognitions level of the professionalism in gifted education in the process of observations & nominations of gifted students, perceive the realm of creativity, learning motive, and attitude as more important. This suggests the necessity of elevating teachers' awareness level of professionalism in gifted and talented education in order to discern high-quality gifted students in the process observations & nominations of gifted elementary students putting emphasis on the realm of creativity, learning motive, and attitude.
Keywords
Teacher's professionalism in gifted education; The discernment of gifted elementary students; Observation and nominations of elementary gifted students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 32(2), 155-179.
2 Scott, J. P., & Jillian, C. G. (2010). The teacher observation form: Revisions and updates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 179-188.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 박숙희 (2009). 소외계층 영재교육. 영재와영재교육, 8(3), 5-21.
4 서울시교육청 (2010). 관찰․추천 영재교육대상자 선발 매뉴얼. 서울: 서울시교육청.
5 서혜애, 조석희, 정현철, 강호감, 박인호, 박일영, 소광섭, 손정우, 이선경, 최호성 (2004). 과학영재학교 신입생 선발체제 분석 연구. 수탁연구. (CR 2004-46) 서울: 한국교육개발원.
6 서혜애, 박경희 (2007). 영재교육 교사 전문성의 구성요소 탐색. 영재교육연구, 17(1), 77-98.
7 이동혁 (2010). 한국어판 Gifted Rating Scale의 구인타당도. 영재교육연구, 20(2), 595-619.
8 이신동, 이정규, 박춘성 (2009). 최신영재교육학개론. 서울: 학지사.
9 이인호, 한기순 (2009). 영재교육 대상자 선발에서 교사 추천의 효용성 분석. 영재교육연구, 19(2), 381-404.
10 임희연 (2008). 초등교사의 발달단계외 교직전문성 인식과의 관계연구. 석사학위논문. 서울교육대학교.
11 진현정, 최호성 (2010). 한국어판 영재아 행동특성 평정척도(K-SRBCSS)의 개발과 타당화. 한국영재학회, 20(2), 621-647.
12 홍서민 (2007). 초등학교 교사의 교직전문성 인식에 따른 자율연수 요구에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
13 한기순, 이정용 (2011). 영재교사들이 지각하는 관찰-추천 영재판별 시스템의 방향, 중요도, 실행수준 분석. 영재교육연구, 21(1), 107-122.
14 Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
15 Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1988). Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 248-253.   DOI
16 Cramond, B., & Martin, C. E. (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers' attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15-19.   DOI
17 Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (Eds.) (2003). Education of the gifted and talented (5th Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18 Feldhusen, J. F., Asher, J. W., & Hoover, S. M. (1984). Problems in the identification of giftedness, talent, or ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 149-151.   DOI
19 Gagnée, F. (1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In K. Heller, H. Passow, & F. Monks (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 69-87). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20 강애남, 이규민 (2006). 학생들의 동료평가를 활용한 수행평가 결과의 일반화가능도 분석. 교육평가연구, 19(3), 107-121.
21 교육과학기술부 (2009). 내년, 영재교육 대상자 선발시험 폐지 구체화. 교육과학기술부. 2009년 8월 24일 보도자료.
22 김대현 (2007). 공립영재교육기관에 선발된 초등과학영재 학부모의 자녀 지원에 대한 실태 조사 - OO광역시를 중심으로. 영재와 영재교육, 6(2), 5-36.
23 박선자, 최경희, 이현주 (2009). 교육청 영재 교육원 과학 담당 교사들의 영재성에 대한 인식. 학습자중심교과교육학회, 9(2), 119-137.
24 김미숙, 이행은, 이홍란, 배종수, 박만구, Cramond, B., & Zysberg, L. (2008). 영재교육대상자 선발 제도 개선 방안 연구. 수탁연구. (CR 2008-4) 서울: 한국교육개발원.
25 류지영 (2010). 관찰․추천을 통한 영재판별에 대한 영재담당교사들의 인식과 태도. 한국교원교육연구, 27(2), 159-178.
26 류지영, 정현철 (2010). 영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰․추천 영재판별모형 개발연구. 영재교육연구, 20(1), 259-289.
27 Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). A history of giftednessin school and society. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd Ed.). (pp. 23-53). London: Elsevie.
28 Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Siegle, D., & Powel, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 21-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (2004). Definitions and conceptions of giftedness. Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.
31 Neber, J. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted children in junior high school: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25, 300-304.
32 Hannninen, G. E. (1988). A study of teacher traning in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10(3), 139-143.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hultgren, H. (1982). Competencies for teachers of the gifted. Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver. Dissertation Abstracts International.
34 McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-255.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Passow, A. H. (1989). Needed research and development in educating high ability children. Roeper Review, 11, 223-229.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Prieto, L., Parra, J., Ferrandiz, C., & Sanchez, C. (2004). The role of the teacher within the identification of gifted students. British Education Index, Rrotherton Library, University of Leeds, UK: lEEDS.
37 Renzulli, J. S., Hartman, R. K., & Callahan, C. M. (1971). Teacher indentification of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38, 211-214.
38 Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
39 Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (Eds.) (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
40 Schack, G. D., & Starko, A. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teacher classroom teacher and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 346-363.