Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.1.057

A Study for Quality of Life in Musically Talented Students Using Experience Sampling Method  

Lee, Hyun-Joo (SungKyunKwan University)
Choe, In-Soo (SungKyunKwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.21, no.1, 2011 , pp. 57-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the quality of life of musically talented students as measured by their external experiences (e.g., activities, companions) and internal experiences (e.g., flow, emotion). The participants in this study were 33 musically talented students (10 males, 23 females) aged 13 to 19. Study data were collected for 7 consecutive days using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), which employs a cellular-phone as a signaling device. The results were as follows: First, in response to the 1625 random signals, musically talented students reported that 40.9% of their time was spent on productive activities. An additional 33.4% of time was used for maintenance activities and the rest of their time was spent on leisure/social activities. Also, musically talented students reported that 48.5% of their time was spent alone. When they were alone, they spent a lot of time engaging in productive activities (44.3%). Second, in order to measure the flow of their life, two methods were used. One used a 4-channel flow model (i.e. apathy, boredom, flow, anxiety) and the other used 8 dimensions and conditions of the flow experience (i.e. concentration, self-consciousness disappears, action and awareness merge, distorted sense of time, freedom from worry about failure, clear goals, immediate feedback, balance between challenges and skills). According to the former, when engaged in music-related activities, musically talented students usually reported flow (54.0%), while they felt apathy (41.3%) for daily routines activities. According to the latter method, musically talented students experienced flow for most productive activities, while they experienced flow least for maintenance activities. Emotional variables of ESF are comprised of 10 semantic scales (i.e. happy-sad, strong-weak, active-passive, sociablelonely, proud-ashamed, involved-detached, excited-bored, clear-confused, relaxed-worried, cooperative-competitive). Musically talented students reported experiencing the most positive emotion for social activities and experiencing the most negative emotion for maintenance activities. Results of this study assert that musically talented students had to trade off immediate enjoyment for developing their special gifts. They could not afford as much time for socializing with friends, and they had to spend more time alone compared to their peers without such gifts. Consequently, they were found to deprive themselves of the spontaneous good times that teenagers usually thrive on. They were helped in this respect by their autotelic personality traits, especially their strong need for achievement and endurance. The downside, however, is that the moment-to-moment quality of their moods suffered. The argument concerning musically talented students applies for all adolescents. The choices that talented students must make between immediate gratification and long-term development, and between solitude and companionship, are the same choices every young person must make, regardless of her or his level of talent. All of us have gifts that are potentially useful and worthy of being appreciated. But to develop these latent talents we must cultivate them, and this takes time and the investment of mental energy. The lifestyle that musically talented students develop can show us some of the choices all of us must make in order to cultivate our gifts.
Keywords
Experience Sampling Method(ESM); Musically talented students, Quality of life; External experiences; Internal experiences;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. NY: Cambridge University Press.
2 Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.   DOI
3 Gabarino, M. S. (1994). 문화인류학의 역사: 사회사상에서 문화의 과학에 이르기까지. [한경구, 임봉길 역]. 서울: 일조각. (원본출간년도: 1983).
4 Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.) (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. NY: Cambridge University Press.
5 Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life toward a theory of emergent motivation. Developmental Perspectives on Motivation, 40, 57-97.
6 Cloward, R. A., & Jones, J. A. (1963). Social class: Educational attitudes and participation. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), Education in depressed area (pp. 190-216). NY: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
7 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). Flow: 미치도록 행복한 나를 만난다. [최인수 역]. 서울: 한울림. (원본출간년도: 1990).
8 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). 몰입의 경영. [심현식 역]. 서울: 황금가지. (원본출간년도: 2004).
9 최인수, 김순옥, 황선진, 이수진 (2003). 경험표집법을 이용한 고등학생들의 생활경험에 관한 연구: 주된 활동과, 활동 공간 및 플로우를 중심으로. 대한가정학회지, 41(8),213-227.
10 Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11 이수진, 유현정 (2002). ESM을 이용한 청소년의 삶의 질 연구. 2002 추계학술발표회 자료집. 서울: 성균관대학교 생활과학연구소.
12 이종규 (2006). 질적 연구방법론. 서울: 교육과학사.
13 Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14 조명한, 김정오, 권석만 (1994). 청소년의 삶의 질. 서울대학교 사회과학과 정책연구, 16(2), 51-94.
15 박성익 (2002). 미국의 영재교육. 구자억 외(편). 동서양 주요 국가들의 영재교육. (pp. 1-86) 서울: 문음사.
16 박성익, 조석희, 김홍원, 이지현, 윤여홍, 진석언, 한기순 (2003). 영재교육학원론. 서울: 교육과학사.
17 성은현 (2006). 문화와 창의성. 인하대학교 국제학술대회 자료집 - 아시아교육의 기적; 가정, 학교 그리고 문화적 맥락에서의 아동 발달.
18 김기옥, 김순옥, 황선진, 이수진, 현은자, 최인수, 유현정 (2005). ESM을 통해 본 대학생의 주관적 삶의 질: 정서, 인지적 효율성, 만족도의 측면에서. 대한가정학회지, 43(2), 203-229.
19 Witty, P., & Lehman, H. C. (1930). Nervous instability and genius: Some conflicting opinions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24, 486-497.   DOI
20 Tannenbaum, A. J. (2004). 영재교육: 심리학과 교육학에서의 조망. [김태련, 김정휘, 조석희 역]. 서울: 이화여자대학교 출판부. (원본출간년도: 1983).
21 Savin-Williams, R. C. (1987). Adolescence: An ethological perspective. NY: Springer-Verlag.
22 Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1986). Selezione psicologica e flusso di coscienza. In F. Massimini, & P. Inghilleri (Eds.), L'esperienza quotidian (pp. 65-84). Milan: Franco Angeli.
23 Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. NY: Oxford University Press.
24 Newland, T. E. (1976). The gifted in socioeducational perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25 Okun, M. A. (1987). Life satisfaction. In G. L. Maddox (Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging (pp. 399-401). NY: Springer.
26 Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (2003). 피그말리온 효과: 기대와 칭찬의 힘. [심재관 역]. 경기: 이끌리오. (원본출간년도: 2003).
27 Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. CA: Sage Publications.
28 Jones, E. (1956). The nature of genius. In E. Jones (Ed.), Sigmund freud: Four centenary addresses (pp. 3-34). NY: Basic Books.