Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.1.163

An Analysis of Patterns of Claims on Scientific Technology of the Science-gifted  

Park, Eun-I (Seoul National University)
Hong, Hun-Gi (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.21, no.1, 2011 , pp. 163-174 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the scientific technology has produced complex problems that required value judgment, science-gifted students need the program for enhancing the critical thinking. Therefore, this study analyzed patterns of claims on scientific technology of the science-gifted for the development of argument program. The data were collected by 60 science-gifted students using writing and e-mail. The result showed that 29% of the participants provided only advantageous factors for their claims, whereas only 10% among the participants who provided both sides used pattern of 'rebuttal.' In addition, the students who fell into the patterns of 'alternative suggestion' and 'overly positive expectation on scientific technology' revealed positive recognition on scientific technology. These results highlight the need of argumentation program for science-gifted students that could be guideline for knowledge or argumentation, help awareness of limitation and role of scientific technology and lead to well-balanced judgment between positive effects and negative ones.
Keywords
Science-gifted; Claim on scientific technology; Value judgment; Scientific argumentation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 남정희, 곽경화, 장경화 (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
2 박정은, 유은정, 이선경, 김찬종 (2009). 논증 구조 교육을 통한 고등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 분석: 과학 글쓰기 장르에 따른 글쓰기 과제를 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), 824-847.
3 강순민 (2004). 과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특성. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교.
4 곽경화, 남정희 (2009). 과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), 400-413.
5 Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norm of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84, 287-312.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Yang, F., & Anderson, O. (2003). Senior high school students' preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 221-244.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
8 Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 American Association for the Advancement of Science[AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
11 Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. New York: Springer.
12 Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Frazer, M., & Kornhauser, A. (1994). 과학교육에서의 윤리와 사회적 책임 [송진웅 역]. 서울: 명경. (원본출간년도: 1986)
14 Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Researcher in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 심미영, 조희형 (2009). 윤리학 이론과 생명과학 관련 사회과학적 논쟁거리에 적절한 생명 윤리 교수-학습 방법의 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(5), 513-530.
17 김리경, 하은선, 송진웅 (2010). 과학관련 사회적 이슈에 대한 과학문화지표의 개발: '기후변화'를 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(4), 472-486.
18 양일호, 이효정, 이효녕, 조현준 (2009). 과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), 203-220.
19 임태훈 (2006). 과학-사회 관련 문제에 대한 과학의 본성과 의사결정 요인 분석. 석사학위논문. 서울대학교.
20 장해리, 정영란 (2009). 과학과 관련된 사회. 윤리적 문제에 대한 의사결정 시 수행하는 비형식적 추론 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), 253-266.