1 |
Kenny, D. T., & Checkaluk, E. (1993). Early reading performance: A comparison of teacher based and test-based assessments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 227-236.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item partialing for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 369-403.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2007). The Gifted Rating Scale-School Form: Analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 39-50.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Zigler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (2nd ed.). (pp. 3-21). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
|
5 |
Ward, S. A. (2005). Gifted rating scales. In R. A. Spiers, & B. S. Plake (Eds.). The 16th mental measurements year book (pp. 404-407). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.
|
6 |
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). The etiology of underachievement in highly gifted young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 3, 38-51.
|
7 |
Wu, W., Cho, S., & Munandar, U. (2000). Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Asia (outside the mainland of China). In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (1st ed.). (pp. 765-777). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
|
8 |
Yang, S. & Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Concepts of intelligence in ancient Chinese philosophy. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 17, 101-119.
DOI
|
9 |
조석희, 김양분 (1994). 일반 학교에서의 효율적인 심화 학습 프로그램 운영 방안 연구, RR 94-11. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
|
10 |
조석희, 오영주 (1998). 지역공동 영재반 운영 방안, CR 98-17. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
|
11 |
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). The sound of silence: A nation responds to it gifted. Roeper Review, 18, 168-173.
DOI
|
12 |
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
13 |
Tate, R. (1998). An introduction to modeling outcomes in the behavioral and social sciences (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Burgess.
|
14 |
Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers' ratings vs. standardized tests: An empirical investigation of greement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106-111.
DOI
|
15 |
Urban, K. K. (1995). Creativity: A component approach model. The 11th World Conference on the Education for the Gifted and Talented, Hong Kong.
|
16 |
Sankar-DeLeeuw, N. (2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 24, 172-177.
DOI
|
17 |
Seo, H., Lee, E. A., & Kim, K. H. (2005). Korean science teachers' understanding of creativity in gifted education. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 98-105.
DOI
|
18 |
Richert, E. S., Alvino, J. J., & McDonnel, R. C. (1982). National report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Educational Information Resource Center.
|
19 |
Siegel, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Silverstein, A. B., Brownlee, L., Legutki, G., & MacMillan, D. L. (1983). Convergent and discriminant validation of two methods of assessing three academic traits. Journal of Special Education, 17, 63-68.
DOI
|
21 |
Rimm, S. B. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Hand book of Gifted Education (2nd ed.). (pp. 416-434). Boston MA: Allyn & Bacon.
|
22 |
Rimm, S. B. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown.
|
23 |
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2001). Professional psychology and the gifted: Emerging practice opportunities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 175-180.
|
24 |
Ross, P. O. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
|
25 |
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the gifted rating scales-preschool/kindergarten scale. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 19-29.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., & Kumtepe, A. (2008). The Gifted Rating Scale-School Form: A validation study based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review, 30, 140-146.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Stocking, V. B. (2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16, 83-93.
DOI
|
28 |
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. I. (1997). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
|
29 |
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 1, 31-50.
|
30 |
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted rating scales. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp, Harcourt Assessment.
|
32 |
Mooney, P., Epstein, M. H., Ryser, G., & Pierce, C. D. (2005). Reliability and validity of the behavioral and emotional rating scale-second edition: Parent rating scale. Children and Schools, 27, 147-155.
DOI
|
33 |
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural education modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
|
34 |
Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1992). The assessment of giftedness in preschool children. In E. V. Nuttall, I. Romero & J. Kalesnik (Eds.), Assessing and screening preschoolers: Psychological and educational dimensions (pp.301-309). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
|
35 |
Perry, N. E., & Meisels, S, J. (1996). Teachers' judgments of students' academic performance [Working paper No. 96-08, National Center for Education Statistics]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
|
36 |
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-351.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Lee, D., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2006). The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the Gifted Ratings Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 210-224.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Li, H., Lee, D., Pfeiffer, S. I., Kamata, A., Kumtepe. A. T., & Rosado, J. (2009). Measurement Invariance of Gifted Rating Scales-School Form across five cultural groups. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 186-198.
DOI
|
39 |
Lee, E. A., & Seo, H. (2006). Understanding of creativity by Korean elementary teachers in gifted education, Creativity Research Journal, 18, 237-242.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Li, H., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y. Kumtepe, A. T., & Mo. G. (2008). Validation of the Gifted Rating Scales-School Form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 160-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Li, H., Lee, D., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Parent rating using Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: Reliability and validity in Chinese students. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68, 659-675.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Margulies, A. S., & Floyd, R. G. (2004). Test review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 275-282.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1989). Gifted evaluation scale (2nd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
|
44 |
Meisels, S. J., Bickel, D. D. P., Nicholson, J., Xue, Y., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2001). Trusting teachers' judgments: A validity study of a curriculum-embedded performance assessment in kindergarten to grade 3. American Educational Researcher Journal, 38, 73-95.
|
45 |
Hoge, R. D. (1983). Psychometric properties of teacher-judgments measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels. Journal of Special Education, 17, 401-429.
DOI
|
46 |
Jackson, N. E. (2003). Young gifted children. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). (pp. 470-482). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
|
47 |
Hoge, R. D., & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777-781.
DOI
|
48 |
Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322-336.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
51 |
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
DOI
|
52 |
Kaufman, A. S., & Harrison, P. L. (1986). Intelligence tests and gifted assessment: What are the positives? Roeper Review, 8, 154-159.
DOI
|
53 |
Gilliam J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and talented evaluation scales. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
|
54 |
Harrison, C. (2004). Giftedness in early childhood: The search for complexity and connection. Roeper Review, 26, 78-84.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
55 |
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
|
56 |
Hodge, K. A., & Kemp, C. P. (2000). Exploring the nature of giftedness in preschool children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 46-73.
DOI
|
57 |
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. W. (1994). Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects, the Fullerton longitudinal study. New York: Plenum.
|
58 |
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233-236.
DOI
|
59 |
Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-162.
DOI
|
60 |
Hagen, E. (1980). Identification of the gifted. New York: Teacher's College Press.
|
61 |
Haroutounian, J. (1995). Talent identification and development in the arts: An artistic/educational dialogue. Roeper Review, 13, 112-117.
|
62 |
Funderburk, B. W., Eyberg, S. M., Rich, B. A., & Behar, L. (2003). Further psychometric evaluation of the Eyberg and Behar raring scales for parents and teachers of preschoolers. Early Education and Development, 14, 67-81.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
63 |
Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 271-282). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
|
64 |
Gallagher, J. J. (2003). Issues and challenges in the education of gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (3rd ed.). (pp. 11-23). Boston, MA: Allyn&Bacon.
|
65 |
Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
DOI
|
66 |
Coleman, M. R., Gallagher, J. J., & Foster, A. (1994). Update report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
|
67 |
Davidson, K. (1986). The case against formal identification. Gifted Child Today, 9, 7-11.
DOI
|
68 |
Elliot, S. N., Busse, R. T., & Gresham, F. M. (1993). Behavior rating scales: Issues of use and development. School Psychology Review, 22, 313-321.
|
69 |
Boatman, T. A., Davis, K. G., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Best practices in gifted education. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 1083-1095). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
|
70 |
Alvino, J., McDonnel, T. C., & Richert, S. (1981). National survey of identification practices in gifted and talented education. Exceptional Children, 48, 124-132.
DOI
|
71 |
Borland, J. H. (1996). Gifted education and the threat of irrelevance. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 129-147.
DOI
|
72 |
Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
73 |
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
74 |
Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268-275.
|
75 |
Young, K. T., Davis, K., Schoen, C., & Parker, S. (1998). Listening to parents: A national survey of parents with young children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152, 255-252.
|
76 |
Yang, S. & Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). Taiwanese Chinese people's conceptions of intelligence. Intelligence, 25, 21-36.
DOI
ScienceOn
|