Browse > Article

Characteristics of Middle School Students in a Biology Special Class at Science Gifted Education Center: Self-regulated Learning Abilities, Personality Traits and Learning Preferences  

Seo, Hae-Ae (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.19, no.3, 2009 , pp. 457-476 More about this Journal
Abstract
The research aimed to investigate characteristics of middle school students in a biology class as science gifted education in terms of self-regulated learning abilities, personality traits and learning preferences. The twenty subject in the study responded to questionnaires of a self-regulated learning ability instrument, a personality trait tool, and a learning preference survey in March, 2009. It was found that the research subjects showed higher levels of cognitive strategies, meta-cognition, and motivation than those students in a previous study(Jung et. al., 2004), while environment was opposite. The level of cognitive strategies was significantly correlated with meta-cognition(r=.610, p=.004) and motivation (r=.538, p=.014) and meta-cognition with environment(r=.717, p=.000). Those students who showed highest levels of self-regulated learning ability displayed various personality traits. One male student with the highest level of self-regulated learning ability showed a personality of hardworking, tender-minded, and conscientious traits and wanted to be a medical doctor. The female student with the second highest level of self-regulated learning ability presented a personality as creative, abstract and divergent thinker and she showed a strong aspiration to be a world-famous biologist with breakthrough contribution. The five students with highest levels of self-regulated learning ability showed a common preference in science learning: they dislike memory-oriented and theory-centered lecture with note-taking from teacher's writings on chalkboard; they prefer science learning with inquiry-oriented laboratory work, discussion among students as well as teachers. However, reasons to prefer discussion were diverse as one student wants to listen other students' opinions while the other student want to present his opinion to other students. The most favorable science teachers appeared to be who ask questions frequently, increase student interests, behave friendly with students, and is a active person. In conclusion, science teaching for the gifted should employ individualized teaching strategies appropriate for individual personality and preferred learning styles as well as meeting with individual interests in science themes.
Keywords
Biology-gifted students; Self-regulated learning ability; Personality trait; Learning preference;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 과학기술부.한국과학재단 (2007). 2007 과학영재인력양성사업 data book. 서울: 과학 기술부. 한국과학재단
2 윤초희, 정현철 (2006). 과학영재의 과학탐구능력 관련 변인에 대한 경로분석 : 숙달 목표, 자기효능감, 자기조절전략 및 탐구수업을 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 20(2), 321-339
3 정현철, 윤초희 (2005). 과학영재의 자율연구능력에 영향을 미치는 교수전략 탐색 및 교수학습모형 개발 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2005-37. 서울: 한국교육개발원
4 Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th Ed.) San Francisco, CA: Pearson Inc
5 Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
6 Woolnough, B. E. (1993). Teachers perception iof reasons students choose for, or against, science and engineering. School Science Review, 75, 112-117
7 Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc
8 Pintrich, P. R. , & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic perforrnance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40   DOI
9 Merideth, C., & Bradley, J. (1976). A consideration of art-science personality difference with particular reference to the thing-person dimension. Educational Studies, 2, 33-44   DOI
10 Sellin, D. F., & Birch, J. W. (1980). Educating gifted and talented learners. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation
11 Plucker, J., & Callahan, C. (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc
12 Collins, J., & Smithers, A. (1983). Psychological profiles of physical and biological science choosers. Research in Sience and Technological Education, 1(1), 5-15   DOI   ScienceOn
13 정충덕, 강경희 (2007). 과학영재의 과학에 대한 태도와 학습동기 및 학습전략과의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(9), 848-853
14 정현철, 조석희, 서혜애, 신명경 (2004). 영재의 자율연구능력 기초탐색연구. 수탁연구 CR 2004-43. 서울: 한국교육개발원
15 서혜애, 장수명, Pereira-Mendoza (2004). 초.중등 우수학생 이공계 진출올 위한 과학교육 정책방안 수렵 연구. 기초연구 RR 2004-5. 서울: 한국교육개발원
16 VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum planniηg and instructional design for the gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love Publishing
17 Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
18 서정희, 최재혁, 김 용 (2007). 고등학교 과학영재학생과 일반학생의 생애학습능력 비교. 한국생물교육학회지, 35(1), 61-72
19 Woolnough, B. E., Guo, Y., Leite, M., Almeida, M., Ryu, T., Wang., Z., & Young, D. (1997). Factors affecting student choice of career in science and engineering Parallel studies in Australia, Canada, China, England, Japan, and Portugal. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(1), 105-121   DOI   ScienceOn
20 김명환 (2009). 과학영재교육기관 연계방안. 과학영재교육의 발전방안. 경인교육대학교 초등과학영재교육연구소 과학영재교육 세미나 자료집. p.13