Browse > Article

Effects of University-Based Science Gifted Education Program on the Science Problem-Finding Ability and Cognitive-Affective Factors of Science Gifted Students  

Ahn, Doe-Hee (Chung-Ang University)
Han, Ki-Soon (University of Incheon)
Kim, Myung-Sook (Sung Kyun Kwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.19, no.2, 2009 , pp. 279-302 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper was to examine the effects of university-based science gifted education program on scientifically gifted students' science problem finding ability and cognitive-affective factors. For this study, 69 scientifically gifted students with previous Silted education experiences at the university-based science gifted education centers and 91 scientifically gifted students without any previous gifted education experiences were compared. Both groups of students were currently enrolled at a specialized science high school. To compare both groups, scientific problem finding ability, science anxiety, science related attitude, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, test anxiety, cognitive strategies, and self-regulation were measured. The results indicate that there was no significant difference on scientific problem finding ability between these two groups. The comparison between the past and now in the aspects of variables observed in the study showed that both groups of students were decreased in the science anxiety and self-efficacy. But the test anxiety was significantly increased compared to the past in both groups. Implications of the study were discussed in depth.
Keywords
Scientifically gifted students; Scientific problem finding ability; Science anxiety; Science related attitude; Self-efficacy; Intrinsic motivation; Test anxiety; Cognitive strategies; Self-regulation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 문병상 (2000). 영재와 평재간의 학업적 자기조절의 차이. 초등교육연구, 14(1), 181-197
2 서혜애, 정현철 (2008). 대학교 부설 과학영재교육원 평가에 대한 메타평가 영재교육연구, 18(2), 313-341
3 채창균, 이재경 (2009) 특목고와 사교육. 한국교육고용패널 제 4차 학술대회 논문집, 제 9주제: 특목고 1-12
4 Leung, S. A., Conoley, C. W., & Scheel, M. J. (1994). The career and educationalaspirations of gifted high school students: A retrospective study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(3), 298-303   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Neber, H‘ & Heller, K. A. (2002). Evaluation of a summer-school program for hìghlygifted secondary-school students: The German pupils academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 214-228   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators,prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148-168   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Rindermann, H., & Heller, K. A. (2005). The benefit of gifted classes and talent schoolsfor developing students'competences and enhancing academic self-concept.German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 133-136
8 Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999a). Evaluating the effects of full-time vs part-timeeducational programs for the gifted: Affective outcomes and policy considerations.Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(4), 4l3-427   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Peterson, J., Duncan, N., & Canady, K. (2009). A longitudinal study of negative lifeevents, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth, Gifted Child Quarterly,53(1), 34-49   DOI   ScienceOn
10 강현아, 조규성, 김자홍, 이국행, 이정원, 강금자, 정덕호(2007). 과학영재아와 일반아 의 기질 및 시험불안과의 관계. 한국지구과학회지, 28(3), 289-297   DOI
11 Covington, M. V., & Dray, E. (2001). The deve10pmental course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.).Development of achievement motivation (pp. 33-56). CA: Academic Press
12 과학기술부 (2007) 과학영재 발굴 육성 종합계획 (2008-2012) 수정안
13 Munby, H. (1983). An investiga into the measurement of attitudes in science education. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. (ERIC Document Reproductionservice No. ED237347)
14 현주, 이재분, 이혜영 (2003) 한국 학부모의 교육열 분석 연구(연구보고 RR 2003-6). 서울: 한국교육개발원
15 Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and giftedstudents: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63
16 이수진, 배진호, 김은진 (2007) 초둥 과학 영재와 일반 아동의 과학 창의적 문제 해 결 과정에서 나타난 사고 유형 및 특성 초등과학교육, 25(5), 567-581
17 김미숙, 이회현, 엄청묵 (2008). 시도교육청과 대학의 영재교육기관 운영 효율화 방안 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고 RR 2008-34
18 Hany, E. A., & Grosch, C. (2007). Long-term effects of enrichment summer courses onthe academic performance of gifted adolescents, Educational Research andEvaluation, 13(6), 521-537   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Peterson, J. S., & Rischar, H. (2000). Gifted and Gay: A study of the adolescentexperience. Gifìed Child Quarterly, 44(4), 231-246   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to leaming: A cross-cultural meta-analysis.In R. Stemberg & 1. Zhang (Eds.). Perspectives on thinking, learning, andcognitive sηles (pp. 165-195). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
21 Rinn, A. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of giftedadolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 65-75
22 김범기 (1993). 학생들의 과학교과 불안도와 학습성취도와의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(3), 341-358
23 Lupkowski, A. E., & Schumacker, R. E. (1991). Mathematics anxiety among talentedstudents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20(6), 563-572   DOI   ScienceOn
24 정현철. 윤초희, 허남영 (2005). 과학영재의 자율연구능력에 영향을 미치는 교수전략 탐색 및 교수${\cdot}$학습모형 개발연구(수탁연구 CR 2005-37). 서울:한국교육개발원
25 Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999b). Test anxiety in intellectually gifted schoolstudents. Anxien, Stress, & Coping, 12(2), 163-189   DOI
26 Freeman, J., & Josepsson, B. (2002). A gifted programme in Iceland and its effects.High Ability Studies, 13(1), 35-46   DOI   ScienceOn
27 김경대, 심재영 (2008). R&E 프로그램을 체험한 과학영재들의 사사교육 프로그랩 효 과에 대한 인식: KAIST 신입생을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(4), 282-290
28 심규철, 소금현, 이현욱, 장남기 (1999). 중학교 과학 영재와 일반 학생의 과학적 태도에 관한 연구. 한국생물교육학회지, 27(4), 368-375
29 Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1), 33-40   DOI
30 Tsui, 1. M., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Effects of math anxiety and perfectionismon timed versus untimed math testing in mathematically gifted sixth graders.Roeper Review, 29(2), 132-139   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differencesbetween gifted and grade-level students‘use of self-regulatory learning processeswith hypermedia. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1069-1083   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA: Test 01 science-related attitudes. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research
33 Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy be!iefs and mathematical problem-solving of giftedstudents, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325-344   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn