Browse > Article

Analysis of K-ABC Profile of Young Gifted Children and Ordinary Young Children  

Oh, Mee-Hyeong (Center for Gifted & Talented Education, Uiduk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.19, no.2, 2009 , pp. 241-260 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to contrast young gifted children with ordinary young children in K-ABC profile. The subject were 51 young gifted children and 51 ordinary young children, 2 to 4 years of age. Data of children's K-ABC profile were analyzed by Correlation and Crosstabs. The main results of this study were as follows: First, in the case of ordinary young children, there were significant positive correlation among 'Mental Processing Composite' and all sub-tests of mental processing composite except 'face memory' test, 'Achievement Scale'. In young gifted children, there were significant positive correlation among 'Mental Processing Composite' and just four sub-tests of mental processing composite, and there were no significant correlation between 'Mental Processing Composite' and 'Achievement Scale'. Second, there were no significant differences among all sub-tests' strength and weakness in young gifted children and ordinary young children. Third, young gifted children got higher score in 'Sequential Processing Scale' and 'Mental Processing Composite' than 'Achievement Scale'. But in ordinary young children, there were no significant differences among all K-ABC' sub-scales.
Keywords
Young gifted children; Ordinary Young Children; K-ABC intelligent test; Profile;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 전경원 (2000). 한국의 써천년을 위한 영재교육학. 학문사
2 Das, J. P., Kirby, J. R., & Jarman, R. F. (1979). Simultaneous and successive cognitiveprocesses. New York: Academic Press
3 Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitivemodifiability. Ba1timore: University Park Press
4 Gazzaniga, M. S. (1970). The bisected brain. New York: Appleton Century Crofts
5 Kames, M. (1983). The underserved: Our young g띠d children. Reston, V A: TheCounci1 for Exceptional Children
6 Luria. A. R. (1966). Higher cortical funtions in man. New York: Basic Books
7 Piirio, J.(2000). The Piirto pyramid of talent development. Gifted Child Today, 23(6),22-29
8 Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded peψrmers. Baltimore:University Park Press
9 Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1984). K-ABC Interpretation manual. Circle Pines,MN: American Guidence Service
10 황희숙, 강승희, 윤소정 (2003). 유아영재의 연령 및 성별에 따른 K-WPPSI 수행과 창의성과의 관계에 대한 탐색 연구. 유아교육연구, 23(4), 81-104
11 Kimura, D. (1967). Functiona1 asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3,163-178
12 Schneider, W., & Shif상n， R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human inforrnation processing: Detection, search, and atfention Psychological Review, 84, 1-66
13 한국교육개발원 (1986) 취학전 영재의 특성 및 부모의 지도실태와 요구에 관한 조사연구 연구보고 86-41
14 Gordon, H. W., & Bogen, J. E. (1974). Hemispheric 1ateralization of singing afterintracarotid sodium amylobarbitone. Journal of Neuralogy, Neurosurgery, andPsychiatry, 37, 727-738   DOI
15 Levy, J. (1972). Lateral specialization of the human brain: Behavioral manifestations andpossible evolutionary basis. In J. A. Kiger(ED.), Biology of behavior. CorvallisOR: Oregon State University Press
16 김선아, 윤초회 (2005). 지적으로 우수한 영재아와 일반아의 가정환경요인이 심리사 회적 적용에 미치는 영향-부부관계와 양육태도졸 중섬으로. 한국아동권허학회, 9(2), 319-338
17 전경원 (1992). 유아영재교육에 관한 이론적 고찰. 광주대학교 사회과학연구소, 2, 319-333
18 Erlich, V. (1978). The Astor Program for gifted children: Pre-kindergarten through gradethree. New York: Teachers Col1ege Press
19 Karen, J. A. (2001). Gifted: The 10st minority. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 168-172
20 Whitmore, J. R. (1996). lntellectual giftdness in young children: Recognition anddevelopment. NY: The Haworth Press
21 Sperry, R. W. (1975). Left-brain, right-brain. Saturday Review, 2(23), 19-25
22 Bogen, J. E. (1975). Some educational aspects of hemispheric specia1ization. UCLAEducator, 17, 24-32
23 문수백 (1997). K-ABC 해석요강. 서울 학지사
24 오영진, 신선희 (2008). Feuerstein의 도구적 심화프로그랩을 통한 중재학습경험이 영재유아의 추론능력에 미치는 효과 열련유아교육연구, 13(2), 331-356.
25 조석희, 안도희, 한석실(2004) 영재의 학업성취도와 사회적 성취도에 따른 지적, 정의적 및 가정의 심리적 환경특성 분석. 한국교육학연구, 10(1), 97-124
26 Paivío, A. (1975), Imagery and synchronic thínking. Canadian Psychological Review, 16,147-163
27 박혜원, 윤여홍 (1999). 왜슬러 유아지농검사에서의 영재아동의 수행특성. 인간발달 연구, 6(2), 33-46
28 Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Trabasso Appleton-Century-Crofts
29 Rimm, S. (2001), Keys to parenting the g띠d child, Hauppage. N, Y; Barron’ s Educatíonal Series
30 Barbour, N. E. (1992). Early childhood gifted education: A col1aborative perspective.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(2), 145-162
31 정범모 (1996). 통일을 대비한 남북한 영유아 보육 및 유아교육의 과제와 전망, 미래유아교육학회지, 2, 1-15
32 윤초희, 윤여홍, 김홍원 (2004). 지적으로 우수한 초등영재아의 심리사회적 적응, 한 국성리학회지, 17(2), 177- 196
33 Paivio, A. (1976). Concerning dual-coding and simultaneous-successive processing.Canadian Psychological Review, 17, 69-71
34 Herskovits, M. (2000). Fami1y influences on the development of high abi1ity. Gifted Education International, 14, 237-246   DOI   ScienceOn
35 장영숙 (2006). 부모의 교육수준과 가치관 및 지원이 유아의 영재성에 미치는 영향. 유아교육연구, 26(6), 296-286
36 Bogen, J. E. (1969). The other side of the brain: Parts 1. 11. and III. Bulletin of the LosAngeles Neurological Society, 34, 73-105
37 Roedell, W. C. (1985), Developing social competencíes in gifted preschool chíldren. Remedial and special Education, 6(4), 6-1 1   DOI